There are 216 users in the forums
The Baalke Meter
May 8, 2017 at 12:12 PM
- McClusky
- Veteran
- Posts: 861
This thread, I like this thread.
May 9, 2017 at 6:33 AM
- ComeOnDeberg
- Veteran
- Posts: 3,251
Lobo,
Another Baalke player gone. RB Harris and some other roster moves. ( I think you already removed RB Davis)
http://www.49ers.com/news/article-2/49ers-Sign-Three-Players-to-90-man-Roster/37841c03-85f5-4799-8ab3-f8dfacfce5a0
Another Baalke player gone. RB Harris and some other roster moves. ( I think you already removed RB Davis)
http://www.49ers.com/news/article-2/49ers-Sign-Three-Players-to-90-man-Roster/37841c03-85f5-4799-8ab3-f8dfacfce5a0
May 9, 2017 at 8:09 AM
- Lobo49er
- Veteran
- Posts: 4,288
Originally posted by ComeOnDeberg:
Lobo,
Another Baalke player gone. RB Harris and some other roster moves. ( I think you already removed RB Davis)
http://www.49ers.com/news/article-2/49ers-Sign-Three-Players-to-90-man-Roster/37841c03-85f5-4799-8ab3-f8dfacfce5a0
Thanks! Working on it right now - actually had a busy day at work yesterday, so couldn't get to this lol. Update coming soon.
May 9, 2017 at 8:24 AM
- Lobo49er
- Veteran
- Posts: 4,288
Updated. 40%!
May 9, 2017 at 10:45 AM
- Lobo49er
- Veteran
- Posts: 4,288
I'm thinking about coming up with something that looks more specifically at how the player was acquired. The chart would include/show information like: "Drafted by", "Signed as an UDFA by (similar to drafted, imo)", and "Signed as a FA by", and "Acquired via Trade by". I'll give it some thought....
[ Edited by Lobo49er on May 9, 2017 at 10:45 AM ]
May 9, 2017 at 1:06 PM
- SmokeCrabtrees
- Veteran
- Posts: 15,580
Originally posted by Lobo49er:Updated. 40%!
If the 53 is off by a player or two what would the % be?
May 9, 2017 at 1:17 PM
- Lobo49er
- Veteran
- Posts: 4,288
Originally posted by SmokeCrabtrees:
If the 53 is off by a player or two what would the % be?
For the 53 man, each player is about 2%.
Examples:
25 Baalke & 28 Sh/Ly/McC = 47% Baalke Meter
26 Baalke & 27 Sh/Ly/McC = 49% Baalke Meter
27 Baalke & 26 Sh/Ly/McC = 51% Baalke Meter
53-Man Baalke Meter last year? 96% (51 Baalke + 2 McCloughan (Staley + Brooks)).`
Was that what you were asking?
[ Edited by Lobo49er on May 9, 2017 at 1:17 PM ]
May 9, 2017 at 1:18 PM
- SmokeCrabtrees
- Veteran
- Posts: 15,580
Originally posted by Lobo49er:Originally posted by SmokeCrabtrees:If the 53 is off by a player or two what would the % be?
For the 53 man, each player is about 2%.
Examples:
25 Baalke & 28 Sh/Ly/McC = 47% Baalke Meter
26 Baalke & 27 Sh/Ly/McC = 49% Baalke Meter
27 Baalke & 26 Sh/Ly/McC = 51% Baalke Meter
53-Man Baalke Meter last year? 96% (51 Baalke + 2 McCloughan (Staley + Brooks)).`
Was that what you were asking?
What it look like right now you think.
May 9, 2017 at 1:46 PM
- Lobo49er
- Veteran
- Posts: 4,288
Originally posted by SmokeCrabtrees:
Originally posted by Lobo49er:
Originally posted by SmokeCrabtrees:
If the 53 is off by a player or two what would the % be?
For the 53 man, each player is about 2%.
Examples:
25 Baalke & 28 Sh/Ly/McC = 47% Baalke Meter
26 Baalke & 27 Sh/Ly/McC = 49% Baalke Meter
27 Baalke & 26 Sh/Ly/McC = 51% Baalke Meter
53-Man Baalke Meter last year? 96% (51 Baalke + 2 McCloughan (Staley + Brooks)).`
Was that what you were asking?
What it look like right now you think.
I'm guessing we keep ~27 from last year (25 Baalke, 2 McC). Result:
25 Baalke & 28 Sh/Ly/McC = 47% Baalke Meter
But when looking at 47%, don't use the current 40% as a point-of-reference. I'll have a separate "Offseason" and "53-man" reference to use. So, for the 53, last year's meter was 96% - Getting to 47% in one year is amazing, fantastic, and sad all at the same time.
[ Edited by Lobo49er on May 9, 2017 at 1:49 PM ]
May 9, 2017 at 2:02 PM
- NCommand
- Hall of Fame
- Posts: 123,365
Originally posted by Lobo49er:I'm thinking about coming up with something that looks more specifically at how the player was acquired. The chart would include/show information like: "Drafted by", "Signed as an UDFA by (similar to drafted, imo)", and "Signed as a FA by", and "Acquired via Trade by". I'll give it some thought....
I love this. And what round players were drafted. It sort of level sets importance, expectations, etc. Like Beadles in FA...signed as a push starter/depth but got better value. He'll be the only FA picked up (basically). So you'll be able to see his one acquisition vs. what ShanaLynch did this year. Signed an UDFA...expectations low. Top 10 pick, high, etc.
May 9, 2017 at 2:08 PM
- Lobo49er
- Veteran
- Posts: 4,288
Originally posted by NCommand:
Originally posted by Lobo49er:
I'm thinking about coming up with something that looks more specifically at how the player was acquired. The chart would include/show information like: "Drafted by", "Signed as an UDFA by (similar to drafted, imo)", and "Signed as a FA by", and "Acquired via Trade by". I'll give it some thought....
I love this. And what round players were drafted. It sort of level sets importance, expectations, etc. Like Beadles in FA...signed as a push starter/depth but got better value. He'll be the only FA picked up (basically). So you'll be able to see his one acquisition vs. what ShanaLynch did this year. Signed an UDFA...expectations low. Top 10 pick, high, etc.
That's smart. (and that's not typed in a "surprised" tone lol). If I do this, I'll definitely include round drafted.
May 9, 2017 at 5:50 PM
- NCommand
- Hall of Fame
- Posts: 123,365
Originally posted by Lobo49er:
Originally posted by NCommand:
Originally posted by Lobo49er:
I'm thinking about coming up with something that looks more specifically at how the player was acquired. The chart would include/show information like: "Drafted by", "Signed as an UDFA by (similar to drafted, imo)", and "Signed as a FA by", and "Acquired via Trade by". I'll give it some thought....
I love this. And what round players were drafted. It sort of level sets importance, expectations, etc. Like Beadles in FA...signed as a push starter/depth but got better value. He'll be the only FA picked up (basically). So you'll be able to see his one acquisition vs. what ShanaLynch did this year. Signed an UDFA...expectations low. Top 10 pick, high, etc.
That's smart. (and that's not typed in a "surprised" tone lol). If I do this, I'll definitely include round drafted.
Youdaman!
May 10, 2017 at 12:16 AM
- JTsBiggestFan
- Veteran
- Posts: 7,739
Hilarious thread......love it!!
Must say though that the Baalke percentage will probably rise a little bit once you hit the 53 man roster because of all the camp bodies we're signing right now.
But next year, Baalke Meter is gonna be sooo low!!!
Must say though that the Baalke percentage will probably rise a little bit once you hit the 53 man roster because of all the camp bodies we're signing right now.
But next year, Baalke Meter is gonna be sooo low!!!
May 10, 2017 at 7:59 AM
- Lobo49er
- Veteran
- Posts: 4,288
Originally posted by JTsBiggestFan:
Hilarious thread......love it!!
Must say though that the Baalke percentage will probably rise a little bit once you hit the 53 man roster because of all the camp bodies we're signing right now.
But next year, Baalke Meter is gonna be sooo low!!!
Thanks! Yep, the Baalke Meter is going to go up closer to 47-50% once we get to the 53 man (though I might use 53 man + 10 man practice squad as the new reference, not sure yet).
I'll keep the OP up to date, and I'll make clear that the reference is one year ago at this time, so as cuts come, we'll adjust the reference.
May 10, 2017 at 8:20 AM
- NCommand
- Hall of Fame
- Posts: 123,365
Originally posted by Lobo49er:Originally posted by JTsBiggestFan:Hilarious thread......love it!!
Must say though that the Baalke percentage will probably rise a little bit once you hit the 53 man roster because of all the camp bodies we're signing right now.
But next year, Baalke Meter is gonna be sooo low!!!
Thanks! Yep, the Baalke Meter is going to go up closer to 47-50% once we get to the 53 man (though I might use 53 man + 10 man practice squad as the new reference, not sure yet).
I'll keep the OP up to date, and I'll make clear that the reference is one year ago at this time, so as cuts come, we'll adjust the reference.
Agreed, half of the 53 man roster will be Baalke with quite a few high upside players coupled with some potential cornerstones via 1 year of a top 10 pick. ShanaLynch just added more with a top 2 pick draft and a few via FA's...half is about what I expected.
Still, we need to add three more critical pieces: FQB, ZWR & ER
[ Edited by NCommand on May 10, 2017 at 8:22 AM ]