There are 319 users in the forums

Jimmy Garoppolo, QB, Los Angeles Rams

Shop 49ers game tickets
  • KID9R
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 3,115
Originally posted by Rice-a-Ronnie:
Originally posted by Phoenix49ers:
Certainly didn't hurt Tennessee when they traded down with St Louis. The leverage that exists is multiple teams wanting QB's and there will be several teams needing one. Teams like the Jets, the Cards, Dolphins and several others could be thinking QB and with there looking to be two or three guys worth taking that early, the 49ers could have the supply to fill the demand. I doubt they'd get an RG3 type deal but I'd be perfectly content with a Goff or Wentz type compensation.

I said this in an earlier post, but I agree. The 2nd Rounder we just gave up, we should get it back by trading down. There will be teams wanting to trade up for a QB.

IMO the compensation isn't really the issue. My issue is, that we are now all in with Jimmy for better or worse. Ideally we're not in the position to draft this high again for a long time, so to pass on the opportunity of the pick of the litter on what WAS supposed to be an excellent QB class is a little scary. I just DON'T want to have what happened to the Browns happen to us when they passed on Wentz and the fans our going to have to watch his career flourish for a long time thinking what could have been.
Originally posted by DonnieDarko:
Originally posted by luis1985:
Originally posted by NYniner85:

Lol




I mean if Scot Mac is angling for a job in the 49ers personnel department.........

Trick or treat madafackassss
Start him against the Giants to build some confidence.

Dummies value those draft picks wayyyyy too much
  • dald1
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 1,108
Originally posted by Afrikan:
And Jim Tomsu..er Harbaugh

Hahahhahaha
Originally posted by RishikeshA:
Win or lose with the trade thanks Kyle and Lynch for renewing my faith.

They needed something to have everyone stop looking at that 0-8 record lol
Originally posted by KID9R:
Originally posted by Rice-a-Ronnie:
Originally posted by Phoenix49ers:
Certainly didn't hurt Tennessee when they traded down with St Louis. The leverage that exists is multiple teams wanting QB's and there will be several teams needing one. Teams like the Jets, the Cards, Dolphins and several others could be thinking QB and with there looking to be two or three guys worth taking that early, the 49ers could have the supply to fill the demand. I doubt they'd get an RG3 type deal but I'd be perfectly content with a Goff or Wentz type compensation.

I said this in an earlier post, but I agree. The 2nd Rounder we just gave up, we should get it back by trading down. There will be teams wanting to trade up for a QB.

IMO the compensation isn't really the issue. My issue is, that we are now all in with Jimmy for better or worse. Ideally we're not in the position to draft this high again for a long time, so to pass on the opportunity of the pick of the litter on what WAS supposed to be an excellent QB class is a little scary. I just DON'T want to have what happened to the Browns happen to us when they passed on Wentz and the fans our going to have to watch his career flourish for a long time thinking what could have been.

Like I explained a few pages back, no we are not. Kyle has alot of choices now.
[ Edited by Afrikan on Oct 30, 2017 at 7:34 PM ]
Originally posted by NYniner85:

Dummies value those draft picks wayyyyy too much

Yet they miss on most
Originally posted by 4ML:
Originally posted by lamontb:
Folks worrying too much about a draft pick as if it's guaranteed gold. We don't need to trade down to get it back. We need to draft the best player maker on the board and give Grapps some weapons.

This x 1000

Of course we don't need to trade back. But it's the best option IMO. It doesn't matter if we get Barkley and free go after Alshin Jeffrey in free agency while that will help, We have the top 5 Worst oline in the league. We need protection for our QB and running lanes for our RB. We also need additional difference makers on D. As of now there isn't a Myles Garrett or Von Miller like player available so the smart thing As of now is to trade down
[ Edited by DJamhour on Oct 30, 2017 at 7:38 PM ]
HOLY SH*T!

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:
Originally posted by eastcoast49ersfan:
Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:
so, we can do it still

We can front load contracts all we want, but the only thing that impacts our cap room 5 years from now is how much money a player is paid over the 5 years, not when it was paid. $10 million in cap spent in 2018 is equivalent to $10 million spent in 2020 if we're looking at cap room in 2020 and beyond. You and others are acting like spending money now doesn't impact our future cap space.
it does. I'm saying.. say we give him 25 guaranteed of a 50 mill 3 year contract. 20 in the 1st, 2.5 in yr 2 and 3.

we would only be out 2.5 in years 2/3 in dead cap space if it doesn't work out (cut)

Good lord, I'm done trying to explain anything to you. Either way, we owe the 25 in guaranteed money over the first 3 years. Who cares how much of it counts as dead cap space in years 2 and 3? Money we spend in year 1 has the exact same impact on our future cap space as dead cap in years 2 and 3.
Originally posted by NCommand:
With the second pick in the 2018 draft, 34th overall, the San Francisco 49ers select, QB Jimny Garoppolo.

basically lol.
  • Jasta
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 1,729
Originally posted by KID9R:
Originally posted by Rice-a-Ronnie:
Originally posted by Phoenix49ers:
Certainly didn't hurt Tennessee when they traded down with St Louis. The leverage that exists is multiple teams wanting QB's and there will be several teams needing one. Teams like the Jets, the Cards, Dolphins and several others could be thinking QB and with there looking to be two or three guys worth taking that early, the 49ers could have the supply to fill the demand. I doubt they'd get an RG3 type deal but I'd be perfectly content with a Goff or Wentz type compensation.

I said this in an earlier post, but I agree. The 2nd Rounder we just gave up, we should get it back by trading down. There will be teams wanting to trade up for a QB.

IMO the compensation isn't really the issue. My issue is, that we are now all in with Jimmy for better or worse. Ideally we're not in the position to draft this high again for a long time, so to pass on the opportunity of the pick of the litter on what WAS supposed to be an excellent QB class is a little scary. I just DON'T want to have what happened to the Browns happen to us when they passed on Wentz and the fans our going to have to watch his career flourish for a long time thinking what could have been.

It's also an insanely good draft to hold a top 3 pick and NOT need a quarterback. Talk about a seller's market.

We need talent at WR, DE, CB and all over the O line and quite possibly at RB, LB as well. Putting all our chips on Rosen or Darnold wouldn't fix that, just look at the Colts.
  • KID9R
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 3,115
Originally posted by Afrikan:
Originally posted by KID9R:
Originally posted by Rice-a-Ronnie:
Originally posted by Phoenix49ers:
Certainly didn't hurt Tennessee when they traded down with St Louis. The leverage that exists is multiple teams wanting QB's and there will be several teams needing one. Teams like the Jets, the Cards, Dolphins and several others could be thinking QB and with there looking to be two or three guys worth taking that early, the 49ers could have the supply to fill the demand. I doubt they'd get an RG3 type deal but I'd be perfectly content with a Goff or Wentz type compensation.

I said this in an earlier post, but I agree. The 2nd Rounder we just gave up, we should get it back by trading down. There will be teams wanting to trade up for a QB.

IMO the compensation isn't really the issue. My issue is, that we are now all in with Jimmy for better or worse. Ideally we're not in the position to draft this high again for a long time, so to pass on the opportunity of the pick of the litter on what WAS supposed to be an excellent QB class is a little scary. I just DON'T want to have what happened to the Browns happen to us when they passed on Wentz and the fans our going to have to watch his career flourish for a long time thinking what could have been.

Like I explained a few pages back, no we are not. Kyle has alot of choices now.
I didn't see your post. Are you suggesting that we would still use our first pick on a QB this year? I honestly hope not.
Share 49ersWebzone