Jimmy Garoppolo, QB, Los Angeles Rams

Originally posted by Waterbear:

Originally posted by SinceXVI:
Meanwhile, Deebo wants to be traded because he's upset that he had to take more punishment than other elite receivers as a result of having to play RB to make up for a limited QB.

So essentially it's all Jimmy G's fault. Damn.

According to some on this thread anything negative that happens on the team is Jimmy's fault. You know that

All Jimmy's fault

Originally posted by Bay2Bay9erAllday:
All Jimmy's fault

Yup team game but it's all Jimmy's fault though guys like 5 and Steve say the QB has no bearing on wins ever.

Originally posted by Goatie:

Originally posted by Waterbear:

Originally posted by SinceXVI:
Meanwhile, Deebo wants to be traded because he's upset that he had to take more punishment than other elite receivers as a result of having to play RB to make up for a limited QB.

So essentially it's all Jimmy G's fault. Damn.

According to some on this thread anything negative that happens on the team is Jimmy's fault. You know that

According to some? Sure…but..

The amount of times someone's been accused of blaming Jimmy for everything >>>>>>> the amount of times someone's actually accused Jimmy of all our issues.

Originally posted by RackofRibs49:

Originally posted by Bay2Bay9erAllday:
All Jimmy's fault

Yup team game but it's all Jimmy's fault though guys like 5 and Steve say the QB has no bearing on wins ever.

I'll give you 100 dollars if you can prove Steve said that.

Stop doing this straw man BS.

Originally posted by Waterbear:

Originally posted by SinceXVI:
Meanwhile, Deebo wants to be traded because he's upset that he had to take more punishment than other elite receivers as a result of having to play RB to make up for a limited QB.

So essentially it's all Jimmy G's fault. Damn.

Not all or always his fault. For example, the Oline was as much to blame for the SB loss as his inability to make off schedule plays.

But according to Ian Rappaport, Deebo allegedly had an issue with how he was used as a hybrid WR/RB last year. A role necessitated by Jimmy's weakness in making 2nd level, 3rd level, and outside the number throws.

A lot of resources, opportunities, and fan's time have been spent on this overpaid mediocre injury plagued QB.

It's just frustrating watching the team being held back and now potentially regressing because they didn't just cut Jimmy.

Originally posted by Waterbear:
I'll give you 100 dollars if you can prove Steve said that.

Stop doing this straw man BS.

I pointed out that Jimmy wins games this is his response.

Originally posted by SteveWallacesHelmet:
.Team accomplishments are not the same as individual accomplishments.

He's literally saying QBs have no basis on winning and that's it's all the team that won Jimmy the game, not Jimmy... The team.

Now pay up.

Crazy thing is... To prove my point even more, why doesn't Steve ever blame the team for a loss but he's here blaming Jimmy every time? I don't see him blaming Tartt for missing a pick. I don't see him blaming the defense for giving the go ahead FG. I only see him point at one guy.

Remember though... Team game. 2300 post about Jimmy but by a quick look I'm guessing maybe 300 about THE TEAM. It's obvious the QB is the most important position and does directly impact winning and losing...if not his post count would be far more spread out. So no he will never directly say it, but he's saying it.

Originally posted by RackofRibs49:

Originally posted by Waterbear:
I'll give you 100 dollars if you can prove Steve said that.

Stop doing this straw man BS.

I pointed out that Jimmy wins games this is his response.

Originally posted by SteveWallacesHelmet:
.Team accomplishments are not the same as individual accomplishments.

He's literally saying QBs have no basis on winning and that's it's all the team that won Jimmy the game, not Jimmy... The team.

Now pay up.

He doesn't say that

Originally posted by RackofRibs49:

Originally posted by Waterbear:
I'll give you 100 dollars if you can prove Steve said that.

Stop doing this straw man BS.

I pointed out that Jimmy wins games this is his response.

Originally posted by SteveWallacesHelmet:
.Team accomplishments are not the same as individual accomplishments.

He's literally saying QBs have no basis on winning and that's it's all the team that won Jimmy the game, not Jimmy... The team.

Now pay up.

He LITERALLY did not say what you said he did.

Your reading comprehension needs some serious work man.

Originally posted by Waterbear:

Originally posted by RackofRibs49:

Originally posted by Waterbear:
I'll give you 100 dollars if you can prove Steve said that.

Stop doing this straw man BS.

I pointed out that Jimmy wins games this is his response.

Originally posted by SteveWallacesHelmet:
.Team accomplishments are not the same as individual accomplishments.

He's literally saying QBs have no basis on winning and that's it's all the team that won Jimmy the game, not Jimmy... The team.

Now pay up.

He LITERALLY did not say what you said he did.

Your reading comprehension needs some serious work man.

Ok... Does Jimmy deserve credit for him having the third best winning % in the entire NFL?

Yes or no?

Simple yes... Or no...

Originally posted by RackofRibs49:

Originally posted by Waterbear:

Originally posted by RackofRibs49:

Originally posted by Waterbear:
I'll give you 100 dollars if you can prove Steve said that.

Stop doing this straw man BS.

I pointed out that Jimmy wins games this is his response.

Originally posted by SteveWallacesHelmet:
.Team accomplishments are not the same as individual accomplishments.

He's literally saying QBs have no basis on winning and that's it's all the team that won Jimmy the game, not Jimmy... The team.

Now pay up.

He LITERALLY did not say what you said he did.

Your reading comprehension needs some serious work man.

Ok... Does Jimmy deserve credit for him having the third best winning % in the entire NFL?

Yes or no?

Simple yes... Or no...

jimmy gets 1/48th credit

48 and not 53 since the team can only suit 48 players

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:

Originally posted by RackofRibs49:

Originally posted by Waterbear:

Originally posted by RackofRibs49:

Originally posted by Waterbear:
I'll give you 100 dollars if you can prove Steve said that.

Stop doing this straw man BS.

I pointed out that Jimmy wins games this is his response.

Originally posted by SteveWallacesHelmet:
.Team accomplishments are not the same as individual accomplishments.

He's literally saying QBs have no basis on winning and that's it's all the team that won Jimmy the game, not Jimmy... The team.

Now pay up.

He LITERALLY did not say what you said he did.

Your reading comprehension needs some serious work man.

Ok... Does Jimmy deserve credit for him having the third best winning % in the entire NFL?

Yes or no?

Simple yes... Or no...

jimmy gets 1/48th credit

48 and not 53 since the team can only suit 48 players

Thanks...

Waterbear? What say you?

Originally posted by SinceXVI:

Originally posted by Waterbear:

Originally posted by SinceXVI:
Meanwhile, Deebo wants to be traded because he's upset that he had to take more punishment than other elite receivers as a result of having to play RB to make up for a limited QB.

So essentially it's all Jimmy G's fault. Damn.

Not all or always his fault. For example, the Oline was as much to blame for the SB loss as his inability to make off schedule plays.

But according to Ian Rappaport, Deebo allegedly had an issue with how he was used as a hybrid WR/RB last year. A role necessitated by Jimmy's weakness in making 2nd level, 3rd level, and outside the number throws.

A lot of resources, opportunities, and fan's time have been spent on this overpaid mediocre injury plagued QB.

It's just frustrating watching the team being held back and now potentially regressing because they didn't just cut Jimmy.

That does not make sense. So Deebo has an issue being used as a hybrid because of JG lack of throwing 2nd & 3rd level but now with Trey about to start who supposedly has that ability Deebo decides to up and leave? If that were true that must mean FO has decided to keep JG and start him. Think about it

Originally posted by RackofRibs49:

Originally posted by Waterbear:
I'll give you 100 dollars if you can prove Steve said that.

Stop doing this straw man BS.

I pointed out that Jimmy wins games this is his response.

Originally posted by SteveWallacesHelmet:
.Team accomplishments are not the same as individual accomplishments.

He's literally saying QBs have no basis on winning and that's it's all the team that won Jimmy the game, not Jimmy... The team.

Now pay up.

Holy 5th grade reading comprehension level, Batman.

For anyone who wants to see the actual post instead of reading what ribs is lying about, the post is #114892.

In no way, shape or form did I say this:

Originally posted by RackofRibs49:
Steve say the QB has no bearing on wins ever.