Originally posted by illinois9er:
Send his ass to the AFC then go ALL in on Watson. I smell NFC domination for years
Man I like your thinking
There are 223 users in the forums
Originally posted by illinois9er:
Send his ass to the AFC then go ALL in on Watson. I smell NFC domination for years
Originally posted by thl408:
How does a reporter get such detailed specifics on a trade offer that should be private information between the two teams? I don't like that trade from the Jets perspective. They should grow that team from the bottom up with all the assets they have instead of trying to contend immediately, assuming one of those 1st rounders in the trade is this years #2 overall. That #2 should be their FQB, unless they aren't hot about any of this year's QBs in the draft.
As a 49er fan, SEA getting that #2 and selecting a high end QB prospect is a bit scary to think about.
Originally posted by Midbay:
Originally posted by SteveWallacesHelmet:
Originally posted by Midbay:
I take this report with a mountain of salt but...
....if true, it suggests where a minimum Watson deal would have to be.
This means the exact opposite of what you think it does.
You sure about that?
Originally posted by Young2Owens:
Originally posted by Midbay:
Originally posted by SteveWallacesHelmet:
Originally posted by Midbay:
I take this report with a mountain of salt but...
....if true, it suggests where a minimum Watson deal would have to be.
This means the exact opposite of what you think it does.
You sure about that?
I believe the saying is a grain of salt meaning that if you add more salt then that means you take it more seriously .
Originally posted by Midbay:Originally posted by SteveWallacesHelmet:Originally posted by Midbay:I take this report with a mountain of salt but...
....if true, it suggests where a minimum Watson deal would have to be.
This means the exact opposite of what you think it does.
You sure about that?
Originally posted by boast:
Originally posted by Midbay:
Originally posted by SteveWallacesHelmet:
Originally posted by Midbay:
I take this report with a mountain of salt but...
....if true, it suggests where a minimum Watson deal would have to be.
This means the exact opposite of what you think it does.
You sure about that?
you used it correctly. SWH is wrong.
https://ell.stackexchange.com/questions/90893/what-is-the-meaning-of-take-my-advice-with-this-much-salt
Originally posted by thl408:
How does a reporter get such detailed specifics on a trade offer that should be private information between the two teams? I don't like that trade from the Jets perspective. They should grow that team from the bottom up with all the assets they have instead of trying to contend immediately, assuming one of those 1st rounders in the trade is this years #2 overall. That #2 should be their FQB, unless they aren't hot about any of this year's QBs in the draft.
As a 49er fan, SEA getting that #2 and selecting a high end QB prospect is a bit scary to think about.
Originally posted by SteveWallacesHelmet:Some basic math:
Originally posted by thl408:
As a 49er fan, SEA getting that #2 and selecting a high end QB prospect is a bit scary to think about.
Wilson > #2, future 1st rounder, future 1st rounder
Originally posted by thl408:
Originally posted by SteveWallacesHelmet:Some basic math:
Originally posted by thl408:
As a 49er fan, SEA getting that #2 and selecting a high end QB prospect is a bit scary to think about.
Wilson > #2, future 1st rounder, future 1st rounder
Your original inequality,
Wilson > #2 + future 1st + future 1st
(subtract future 1st from both sides)
Wilson - future 1st > #2 + future 1st
(subtract future 1st from both sides)
Wilson - future 1st - future 1st > #2
(reverse the sign)
#2 < Wilson - future 1st - future 1st
(divide each side by #2)
1 < (Wilson - future 1st - future 1st) / #2
Yup, you're right.
Originally posted by thl408:Was there a picture of Steven Hawking on the box of Wheaties you ate this morning?
Originally posted by SteveWallacesHelmet:Some basic math:
Originally posted by thl408:
As a 49er fan, SEA getting that #2 and selecting a high end QB prospect is a bit scary to think about.
Wilson > #2, future 1st rounder, future 1st rounder
Your original inequality,
Wilson > #2 + future 1st + future 1st
(subtract future 1st from both sides)
Wilson - future 1st > #2 + future 1st
(subtract future 1st from both sides)
Wilson - future 1st - future 1st > #2
(reverse the sign)
#2 < Wilson - future 1st - future 1st
(divide each side by #2)
1 < (Wilson - future 1st - future 1st) / #2
Yup, you're right.
Originally posted by Midbay:
Was there a picture of Steven Hawking on the box of Wheaties you ate this morning?
Originally posted by thl408:
Originally posted by Midbay:
Was there a picture of Steven Hawking on the box of Wheaties you ate this morning?
Originally posted by Midbay:
Originally posted by thl408:
Originally posted by Midbay:
Was there a picture of Steven Hawking on the box of Wheaties you ate this morning?
лол ржунимагу! Well done all around!
Originally posted by thl408:
How does a reporter get such detailed specifics on a trade offer that should be private information between the two teams? I don't like that trade from the Jets perspective. They should grow that team from the bottom up with all the assets they have instead of trying to contend immediately, assuming one of those 1st rounders in the trade is this years #2 overall. That #2 should be their FQB, unless they aren't hot about any of this year's QBs in the draft.
As a 49er fan, SEA getting that #2 and selecting a high end QB prospect is a bit scary to think about.