49ers Offensive Line

Originally posted by RonnieLott:
Yes. Its true.

Any teams where the fans are pretty much satisfied with every single position on the depth chart here in May? Would love to take a peak and and observe what you're seeing. Because context.

Originally posted by RonnieLott:
you are just arguing for the sake of arguing.

I'd rather have Kermit the frog on a lily pad singing Rainbow Connection playing Offensive Guard than Spencer Burford.

Why are there so many songs about blown offensive guard assignments and how they cost teams Super bowls?"

even if you had Kermit, you still need to wait for him to flourish.. acting like you can just throw any name out there and it's better lol

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:

Originally posted by RonnieLott:
you are just arguing for the sake of arguing.

I'd rather have Kermit the frog on a lily pad singing Rainbow Connection playing Offensive Guard than Spencer Burford.

Why are there so many songs about blown offensive guard assignments and how they cost teams Super bowls?"

even if you had Kermit, you still need to wait for him to flourish.. acting like you can just throw any name out there and it's better lol

But some flourish quicker than others and spending money on talent that has flourished elsewhere and taking it and making it better is how a team improves.

And that is what true, good coaching is

And we are still talking about our current offensive line blowing assignments on the biggest play of the year.

Originally posted by random49er:

Originally posted by RonnieLott:
Yes. Its true.

Any teams where the fans are pretty much satisfied with every single position on the depth chart here in May? Would love to take a peak and and observe what you're seeing. Because context.

The context is our last offensive play of last year.

That is the context.

Originally posted by RonnieLott:

Originally posted by random49er:

Originally posted by RonnieLott:
Yes. Its true.

Any teams where the fans are pretty much satisfied with every single position on the depth chart here in May? Would love to take a peak and and observe what you're seeing. Because context.

The context is our last offensive play of last year.

That is the context.

So no teams that are topped off at every position you can name. But the 49ers should be, correct?

Make it make sense.

Originally posted by RonnieLott:

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:

Originally posted by RonnieLott:
you are just arguing for the sake of arguing.

I'd rather have Kermit the frog on a lily pad singing Rainbow Connection playing Offensive Guard than Spencer Burford.

Why are there so many songs about blown offensive guard assignments and how they cost teams Super bowls?"

even if you had Kermit, you still need to wait for him to flourish.. acting like you can just throw any name out there and it's better lol

But some flourish quicker than others and spending money on talent that has flourished elsewhere and taking it and making it better is how a team improves.

And that is what true, good coaching is

And we are still talking about our current offensive line blowing assignments on the biggest play of the year.

This ain't madden

only one play was blown by one player (Beu) who was only in there because feliciano tore a pec

your take is a grass is greener take and has no context

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:
This ain't madden

only one play was blown by one player (Beu) who was only in there because feliciano tore a pec

your take is a grass is greener take and has no context

And they resigned Feliciano while drafting two guards. Sure seems like that is addressing the issue.

Now are any of those guys gonna develop into pro bowlers? Who knows.

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:

Originally posted by RonnieLott:

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:

Originally posted by RonnieLott:
you are just arguing for the sake of arguing.

I'd rather have Kermit the frog on a lily pad singing Rainbow Connection playing Offensive Guard than Spencer Burford.

Why are there so many songs about blown offensive guard assignments and how they cost teams Super bowls?"

even if you had Kermit, you still need to wait for him to flourish.. acting like you can just throw any name out there and it's better lol

But some flourish quicker than others and spending money on talent that has flourished elsewhere and taking it and making it better is how a team improves.

And that is what true, good coaching is

And we are still talking about our current offensive line blowing assignments on the biggest play of the year.

This ain't madden

only one play was blown by one player (Beu) who was only in there because feliciano tore a pec

your take is a grass is greener take and has no context

They simply haven't addressed their biggest issue of the off season.

The problems with the offensive line have been obvious for a while and no one can hide it

And as we get towards the play offs each year, it becomes more and more obvious.

Originally posted by RonnieLott:
They simply haven't addressed their biggest issue of the off season.

The problems with the offensive line have been obvious for a while and no one can hide it

And as we get towards the play offs each year, it becomes more and more obvious.

It wasn't that they didn't try. Every team in the league is trying to improve their OT position. If they have a good one they aren't going to let him go. There were no improvements available in FA. So, they went into the draft hoping someone would fall to them. Rumor has it they targeted Rosengarten but he got picked one slot earlier. Bummer. At that point, all the quality guys were gone.

I expect to see improvement from McKivitz if Feliciano can stay healthy. Burford clearly was a big part of the problem. If JF can go the whole year, that will allow Mc to just focus on his own game and improve.

I hope.

Originally posted by RonnieLott:
They simply haven't addressed their biggest issue of the off season.

The problems with the offensive line have been obvious for a while and no one can hide it

And as we get towards the play offs each year, it becomes more and more obvious.

Thats just not accurate. They absolutely addressed it. Added Hubbard, 3 interior rooks and resigned Felciano.

Now is that enough? Don't know. Until anyone actually plays we don't know who is good and who isnt.

Originally posted by 9ers4eva:

Originally posted by RonnieLott:
They simply haven't addressed their biggest issue of the off season.

The problems with the offensive line have been obvious for a while and no one can hide it

And as we get towards the play offs each year, it becomes more and more obvious.

Thats just not accurate. They absolutely addressed it. Added Hubbard, 3 interior rooks and resigned Felciano.

Now is that enough? Don't know. Until anyone actually plays we don't know who is good and who isnt.

Your first point is subjective. Have they addressed it really enough?!?! They could have done a lot more than they did.

Your second point is accurate.

And then there is the general curse that Kyle Shannahan has on him that he is never to win a Superbowl which of course they can't beak no matter who is playing.

Originally posted by RonnieLott:

Originally posted by 9ers4eva:

Originally posted by RonnieLott:
They simply haven't addressed their biggest issue of the off season.

The problems with the offensive line have been obvious for a while and no one can hide it

And as we get towards the play offs each year, it becomes more and more obvious.

Thats just not accurate. They absolutely addressed it. Added Hubbard, 3 interior rooks and resigned Felciano.

Now is that enough? Don't know. Until anyone actually plays we don't know who is good and who isnt.

Your first point is subjective.

Saying "they haven't addressed" what they clearly addressed is hugely subjective as well.

Originally posted by RonnieLott:
Your first point is subjective. Have they addressed it really enough?!?! They could have done a lot more than they did.

Your second point is accurate.

And then there is the general curse that Kyle Shannahan has on him that he is never to win a Superbowl which of course they can't beak no matter who is playing.

After seeing Brock Purdy become QB1 you should learn to wait and see how the guys turn out first.

Did they address the secondary enough so they won't blow coverages and allow game winning tds? I don't know.

Originally posted by 9ers4eva:
After seeing Brock Purdy become QB1 you should learn to wait and see how the guys turn out first.

Did they address the secondary enough so they won't blow coverages and allow game winning tds? I don't know.

Just hope they've addressed the RB position enough so that that "1-play" fumble McCaffrey had won't kill us in another SB.

#MakeItMakeSense

Originally posted by random49er:
Just hope they've addressed the RB position enough so that that "1-play" fumble McCaffrey had won't kill us in another SB.

#MakeItMakeSense

When a dude starts talking about Witches curses I don't think it will ever make sense