49ers Offensive Line

Originally posted by 9ers4eva:

Originally posted by RonnieLott:
They simply haven't addressed their biggest issue of the off season.

The problems with the offensive line have been obvious for a while and no one can hide it

And as we get towards the play offs each year, it becomes more and more obvious.

Thats just not accurate. They absolutely addressed it. Added Hubbard, 3 interior rooks and resigned Felciano.

Now is that enough? Don't know. Until anyone actually plays we don't know who is good and who isnt.

Originally posted by mcwoot:

Originally posted by 9ers4eva:

Originally posted by RonnieLott:
They simply haven't addressed their biggest issue of the off season.

The problems with the offensive line have been obvious for a while and no one can hide it

And as we get towards the play offs each year, it becomes more and more obvious.

Thats just not accurate. They absolutely addressed it. Added Hubbard, 3 interior rooks and resigned Felciano.

Now is that enough? Don't know. Until anyone actually plays we don't know who is good and who isnt.

Late rounders and UDFA scrubs that will likely be PS players at best aren't "addressing" a need. It's gravy if they ever contribute at all. Re-signing Feliciano is maintaining the status quo, not getting better. The fact is that the FO addressed what was arguably our biggest weakness all year with a 3rd round pick. I like Puni and I think he will be solid, but there is no reason to believe the OL will be any better this year than it was last year, and the cupboard is looking very bare for the future.

Originally posted by mcwoot:
Late rounders and UDFA scrubs that will likely be PS players at best aren't "addressing" a need. It's gravy if they ever contribute at all. Re-signing Feliciano is maintaining the status quo, not getting better. The fact is that the FO addressed what was arguably our biggest weakness all year with a 3rd round pick. I like Puni and I think he will be solid, but there is no reason to believe the OL will be any better this year than it was last year, and the cupboard is looking very bare for the future.

Originally posted by RonnieLott:
This is so accurate; they could have spent a first draft pick or second draft pick on OL the last couple of years and that would have shown at least that they were trying to address the issue.

Originally posted by 9ers4eva:

Originally posted by RonnieLott:
This is so accurate; they could have spent a first draft pick or second draft pick on OL the last couple of years and that would have shown at least that they were trying to address the issue.

They couldn't have spent a 1st or 2nd last year.

So McGlinchey was a good decision solely because they showed they were addressing the issue?

Originally posted by 9ers4eva:

Originally posted by RonnieLott:
This is so accurate; they could have spent a first draft pick or second draft pick on OL the last couple of years and that would have shown at least that they were trying to address the issue.

They couldn't have spent a 1st or 2nd last year.

So McGlinchey was a good decision solely because they showed they were addressing the issue?

Originally posted by RonnieLott:
At least it showed intent. it showed that the OL was an area of need which was absolutely correct.

At the time it seemed a reach and not every pick is correct.

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:
this guy Ron talking out the ass now.. NC like. spend a first ? lol

Originally posted by 9ers4eva:

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:
this guy Ron talking out the ass now.. NC like. spend a first ? lol

Just use high picks. Doesn't matter if they hit.

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:

Originally posted by 9ers4eva:

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:
this guy Ron talking out the ass now.. NC like. spend a first ? lol

Just use high picks. Doesn't matter if they hit.

yeah let just use a first or second rounder when we didn't have a first rounder for the last two years. Football is hard for some fans

Originally posted by RonnieLott:

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:

Originally posted by 9ers4eva:

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:
this guy Ron talking out the ass now.. NC like. spend a first ? lol

Just use high picks. Doesn't matter if they hit.

yeah let just use a first or second rounder when we didn't have a first rounder for the last two years. Football is hard for some fans

Look at every draft, there is boom and bust picks all over. In fact, it is funny to go back and read the names selected before genuine super stars in past drafts.

OL is a tremendous need and should be feed with multiple draft picks.

Thats not a hard concept to fathom.

Originally posted by RonnieLott:
Look at every draft, there is boom and bust picks all over. In fact, it is funny to go back and read the names selected before genuine super stars in past drafts.

OL is a tremendous need and should be feed with multiple draft picks.

Thats not a hard concept to fathom.

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:
it's hard for you.. as you have missed 4 NFC, and 2 SBs with a line that you think sucks. On top of that, the other 2 years that we missed the playoffs weren't due to the OL either.

Originally posted by 9ers4eva:

Originally posted by RonnieLott:
Look at every draft, there is boom and bust picks all over. In fact, it is funny to go back and read the names selected before genuine super stars in past drafts.

OL is a tremendous need and should be feed with multiple draft picks.

Thats not a hard concept to fathom.

They did use multiple draft picks then signed one of he top rated undrafted OL.

Is secondary also not a tremendous need?