In case you missed it, the media had a field day with a story that Pro Football Talk's Mike Florio broke at 1:28 PM stating that the Cleveland Browns had nearly landed the rights to San Francisco 49ers head coach Jim Harbaugh in "a deal that would have sent multiple draft picks to San Francisco."
Florio stated that the deal was in place, but it was Harbaugh that ultimately decided not to leave San Francisco.
And that's when the fun began. The media jumped all over this story and there were multiple sources going back-and-forth about the possibility that such a trade was in place.
NFL Network's Ian Rapoport reported that the Browns did indeed make a run at Harbaugh, as did the University of Texas, per sources informed of the Browns' thinking. Whether or not such a move was on the 49ers' mind was the question. Rapoport stated that a 49ers source denied the claim.
NFL Network's Albert Breer also stated that a high-ranking 49ers source said that the club did not communicate with Cleveland about Harbaugh.
Florio quickly came to his own defense.
Rapoport responded by stating that his source was actually two high-ranking 49ers sources. Florio continued to defend himself.
Then 49ers CEO Jed York stepped in and stated on Twitter that the report was not true.
Now the question is, "Is the whole report false?" Did the Browns attempt to set up a deal to acquire Harbaugh? How far did they get? Did they contact the 49ers? Did the 49ers simply say that there was no interest in trading the rights to Harbaugh? Were they just not interested in what the Browns were offering? Were they interested and it was actually Harbaugh to killed the plan as Florio originally stated?
ESPN's Chris Mortensen confirmed the substance of Pro Football Talk's report.
Matt Barrows of the Sacramento Bee reminded us that "York and Harbaugh began discussing a contract extension last offseason but talks broke off when there was little progress." He also stated that Harbaugh and former Browns general manager Mike Lombardi are close.
According to Chris Wesseling, "Jim Harbaugh acknowledged in December that he and general manager Trent Baalke often 'butt heads,' but insisted that any reports of tension between the two men are overblown."
Regardless, this is an interesting development considering that the 49ers would like to work on contract extension for Harbaugh.
More San Francisco 49ers News
-
Schefter provides recovery update, potential return timeline for 49ers' Brandon Aiyuk
San Francisco 49ers wide receiver Brandon Aiyuk has been the subject of significant trade speculation, especially with his $22.85 million roster bonus due on April 1. However, the recovery from a major knee injury complicates matters—Aiyuk suffered a torn ACL and MCL in... -
Kyle Shanahan: Too early for 49ers to set timeline on Brandon Aiyuk's return
Brandon Aiyuk isn't expected to be ready when the San Francisco 49ers kick off the 2025 season. According to ESPN's Adam Schefter, a mid-season return seems more realistic, though the 49ers haven't ruled out the possibility of an earlier comeback. Aiyuk suffered a torn ACL and... -
49ers Brandon Aiyuk trade: Why moving him now makes sense—and why it doesn't
The 49ers' return window for Brandon Aiyuk closes April 1, offering the Niners one final opportunity to trade him and move on from a contract decision they reportedly never wanted to make. No, it's not April Fools, but it sure feels a lot like Groundhog Day. Just months after... -
Schefter: 49ers not expected to trade Brandon Aiyuk
Tuesday marks an unofficial deadline for any potential trade involving Brandon Aiyuk. The San Francisco 49ers wide receiver is set to receive a $22.85 million bonus on April 1, making a trade unlikely beyond that date. "Once the 49ers pay that bonus, any trade talks for Aiyuk...