LISTEN: Did Bad Business Sink The 49ers? →

There are 249 users in the forums

WZ Football 2014

  • jrg
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 166,549
Originally posted by BamBam49er:
QB
WR
WR
WR
RB
RB
TE
WR/RB/TE

eh?

RB's rule all, so that'd pretty much cancel out anyone starting a WR/TE at the WR/RB/TE spot..so that may work as well.
Originally posted by BamBam49er:
QB
WR
WR
WR
RB
RB
TE
WR/RB/TE

eh?
this
Originally posted by jrg:
Originally posted by BamBam49er:
QB
WR
WR
WR
RB
RB
TE
WR/RB/TE

eh?

RB's rule all, so that'd pretty much cancel out anyone starting a WR/TE at the WR/RB/TE spot..so that may work as well.

Why dont we just make it three RB and three WR?
Originally posted by AllTimeGreat:
Originally posted by jrg:
Originally posted by BamBam49er:
QB
WR
WR
WR
RB
RB
TE
WR/RB/TE

eh?

RB's rule all, so that'd pretty much cancel out anyone starting a WR/TE at the WR/RB/TE spot..so that may work as well.

Why dont we just make it three RB and three WR?

cuz WR/RB/TE looks cooler
  • jrg
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 166,549
Originally posted by AllTimeGreat:
Originally posted by jrg:
Originally posted by BamBam49er:
QB
WR
WR
WR
RB
RB
TE
WR/RB/TE

eh?

RB's rule all, so that'd pretty much cancel out anyone starting a WR/TE at the WR/RB/TE spot..so that may work as well.

Why dont we just make it three RB and three WR?

Same goes w/ the TE thing..do you think there are 36 worthy fantasy RB's?
Originally posted by BamBam49er:
Originally posted by AllTimeGreat:
Originally posted by jrg:
Originally posted by BamBam49er:
QB
WR
WR
WR
RB
RB
TE
WR/RB/TE

eh?

RB's rule all, so that'd pretty much cancel out anyone starting a WR/TE at the WR/RB/TE spot..so that may work as well.

Why dont we just make it three RB and three WR?

cuz WR/RB/TE looks cooler

Originally posted by jrg:
Originally posted by AllTimeGreat:
Originally posted by jrg:
Originally posted by BamBam49er:
QB
WR
WR
WR
RB
RB
TE
WR/RB/TE

eh?

RB's rule all, so that'd pretty much cancel out anyone starting a WR/TE at the WR/RB/TE spot..so that may work as well.

Why dont we just make it three RB and three WR?

Same goes w/ the TE thing..do you think there are 36 worthy fantasy RB's?

Yes. Think about it. There are so many two headed RB situations in the nfl.

But i'm fine with the WR/RB/TE thingy.
we don't get a bench?
  • jrg
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 166,549
Originally posted by BamBam49er:
we don't get a bench?

5 bench slots
Originally posted by BamBam49er:
yeah lifer fight for our right!

..to, play fantasy football...

Dirka Dirkistan is in the mutha fukin house!!!! Bam and I are gonna roll this place!!!!
simplify this jrg....take out a WR and put two flex spots in

QB
RB
RB
WR
WR
TE
K
DEF
RB/WR
RB/WR/TE
Originally posted by AllTimeGreat:
Originally posted by jrg:
Originally posted by BamBam49er:
QB
WR
WR
WR
RB
RB
TE
WR/RB/TE

eh?

RB's rule all, so that'd pretty much cancel out anyone starting a WR/TE at the WR/RB/TE spot..so that may work as well.

Why dont we just make it three RB and three WR?

not that many Rbs worthy of starting each week, I'd like to have the option of starting a WR or TE who I think will score a TD, than a backup RB who may not gain 10 yards
Originally posted by BamBam49er:
QB
WR
WR
WR
RB
RB
TE
WR/RB/TE

eh?

I think this is the best

other leage I'm in (Esco's) is set up the same way
I said count me in yet I am not on "the list" so I guess this means I am too cool for your crew.
Originally posted by RonMexico:
Originally posted by BamBam49er:
QB
WR
WR
WR
RB
RB
TE
WR/RB/TE

eh?

I think this is the best

other leage I'm in (Esco's) is set up the same way

exactly where i stole it from
Search Share 49ersWebzone