***Fantasy Football Thread***

Originally posted by 49erFaithful6:

Originally posted by InconvenientTruth21:
Appreciate the input.
with Akers suddenly out for what might be a while I might just have to pull the trigger. Next man up is mark Ingram or Caleb huntley lmao

What's the deal with Akers? Watch he gets dealt to Minnesota..

Wouldnt be surprised if they get CMC somehow

Originally posted by krizay:

Originally posted by InconvenientTruth21:
What do you guys think about trading Mark Andrews for Joe Mixon, and/or Drake London for George Kittle. It's .5 ppr. 2 separate trades.

My current rbs are Mccaffrey, Akers, and a bunch of hopeful backups.

current WRs are Waddle, Cooper, London, Rashad Bateman, Valdez Scantling. It's a 3 WR league + flex.

🤔

As a Mixon owner in one league and Andrews in another, I would not give up Andrews for Mixon. At least not straight up.

As for the other trade. I'd be ok giving up Bateman for Kittle as currently constructed.

I would not like the combo trade if you were to pull the trigger on both.

Absolutely do NOT make either trade. You have an automatic advantage at TE every week that you aren't playing against Kelce. TE is down all across the league and you have one of the actual difference makers. Alternatively, while true RB1s are few and far between this year, Mixon has NOT been a difference maker this year. Wildly inefficient all year, had lost receiving game work to Perine, and while his absurd usage has been the only selling point for Mixon, the most recent, albeit small, sample that we have is that his usage is being lessened. I drafted him at 9 overall this year expecting a better OLine and that has yet to happen. I just moved him for Kenneth Walker III and DeAndre Hopkins. Granted, I'm 1-4 in that league so was comfortable with a desperation boom or bust type of trade. Either I win and win big, or I would have lost regardless.

As for trading London, it's a 3 WR league. This makes WR the most important roster position. Do not give up a viable every week starter with remaining untapped upside for an underutilized, unperforming (for fantasy) TE

Originally posted by DJamhour:

Originally posted by krizay:
So you went from posting that everyone overvalued their players and clearly has to win the trade. To overvaluing your player clearly trying to win the trade.

Fair point but I was referring to Godwin isn't someone im comfortable trading for because of injury concerns. I'm sure most would say hall is more valuable fantasy asset regardless of who owns who

JMO but there is no way I would trade Hall for Godwin. Hall is a player on the rise while Godwin is TB's WR2 and often hurt. That would be a terrible trade for you.

With a bye week for some starters, I'm down to B. Aiyuk or T. Coleman to start as my flex player this week. Who would you go with?

Originally posted by richierichard:
With a bye week for some starters, I'm down to B. Aiyuk or T. Coleman to start as my flex player this week. Who would you go with?

Aiyuk for me

Went into tonight's game up 8 with Mike Williams left, opponent has Everett

Thoughts on this trade I was offered..

I got offered

Justin Jefferson
Alvin Kamara
Hockessin

For

Jamaar Chase
Mark Andrews.

Originally posted by BMoore56:
Thoughts on this trade I was offered..

I got offered

Justin Jefferson
Alvin Kamara
Hockessin

For

Jamaar Chase
Mark Andrews.

Id do it. Adding Kamara to play the TE stream game. I'd take my chances

Originally posted by BMoore56:
Thoughts on this trade I was offered..

I got offered

Justin Jefferson
Alvin Kamara
Hockessin

For

Jamaar Chase
Mark Andrews.

Tricky. I definitely think you get the best player in the trade (J.Jeff) but losing Andrews is a big blow, especially in this (TE) economy. Not sure an up-and-down Kamara is enough to offset that. I guess it just depends on how desperate you are; what is your lineup and what is your record.

Originally posted by adrianlesnar:

Originally posted by BMoore56:
Thoughts on this trade I was offered..

I got offered

Justin Jefferson
Alvin Kamara
Hockessin

For

Jamaar Chase
Mark Andrews.

Tricky. I definitely think you get the best player in the trade (J.Jeff) but losing Andrews is a big blow, especially in this (TE) economy. Not sure an up-and-down Kamara is enough to offset that. I guess it just depends on how desperate you are; what is your lineup and what is your record.

Im 5-1

Kyler
Chase
Deebo
Chubb
James Robinson
Andrews
JuJu

Also have Melvin Gordon who looks done

Originally posted by BMoore56:
Im 5-1

Kyler
Chase
Deebo
Chubb
James Robinson
Andrews
JuJu

Also have Melvin Gordon who looks done

Im ALL OVER it. Then just stream TEs. Your team would be down right nasty

Originally posted by krizay:

Originally posted by BMoore56:
Im 5-1

Kyler
Chase
Deebo
Chubb
James Robinson
Andrews
JuJu

Also have Melvin Gordon who looks done

Im ALL OVER it. Then just stream TEs. Your team would be down right nasty

I would do that as well. He needs another RB badly and I think Kamara will be good moving forward. As for streaming TEs, I dont even think he will need to. Hockenson is a top 10 TE pretty much every week.

Originally posted by Ninerjohn:
I would do that as well. He needs another RB badly and I think Kamara will be good moving forward. As for streaming TEs, I dont even think he will need to. Hockenson is a top 10 TE pretty much every week.

You must not have been paying close attention to him this year.

Originally posted by krizay:

Originally posted by Ninerjohn:
I would do that as well. He needs another RB badly and I think Kamara will be good moving forward. As for streaming TEs, I dont even think he will need to. Hockenson is a top 10 TE pretty much every week.

You must not have been paying close attention to him this year.

there are only 2 guys at TE that are sure things. But, I would still take the upside of Hockenson most weeks over guys on the waiver wire. He is 5th in total points and has already had his bye week. Is he perfect? Hell no but I never carry more than 1 TE on my roster and I wouldnt cut him thats for sure.

I probably wouldnt trade Chase and Andrews for Jefferson and Kamara without Hockenson being included in the deal.

Originally posted by Ninerjohn:
there are only 2 guys at TE that are sure things. But, I would still take the upside of Hockenson most weeks over guys on the waiver wire. He is 5th in total points and has already had his bye week. Is he perfect? Hell no but I never carry more than 1 TE on my roster and I wouldnt cut him thats for sure.

I probably wouldnt trade Chase and Andrews for Jefferson and Kamara without Hockenson being included in the deal.

I concur with you other on the trade philosophy portion. However, with Chubb, Kamara, Robinson and Gordon done in DEN that roster spot would be better served with a rotating TE to go with Hock.

Same can be said for his end of the roster WRs. Never seeing the field with Deebo and JJ. So why keep a 5th WR or 5th RB instead of rotating a position you will actually start.