Jimmy Garoppolo-QB-EIU

Originally posted by Phoenix49ers:

Originally posted by tjd808185:

I don't see Clv taking Garrett and just letting whatever qb falls be their pick. If they let us have Garrapollo that means they pretty much have to go qb at 1. Nobody should think Peyton Manning, Ryan Leaf we're good either way. Clv has the option of picking their guy that's not one you want to give up.

But I think most would be happy with Garrett, Garrapolo.

All the more upside to getting Garoppolo if it forces the Browns to go QB and leaves Garrett to the 49ers.

Right not sure how anyone could hate on that scenario...but I'm sure some would find a way lol.

Originally posted by NYniner85:
Right not sure how anyone could hate on that scenario...but I'm sure some would find a way lol.

That would be a very happy scenario for me. A talented young QB that is ready to start, a freak generational pass rushing prospect, use the rest of the draft to add players at WR, ILB, NT and C. Add some impact players in free agency, bewm.

Originally posted by Phoenix49ers:

All the more upside to getting Garoppolo if it forces the Browns to go QB and leaves Garrett to the 49ers.

The Browns will do whatever they want we can't force them into anything. If they want Jimmy G they have 2 1sts and 2 2nds. They'll win any bidding war.

If they want Mitch they got 1st pick as of now.

Originally posted by Phoenix49ers:

Originally posted by NYniner85:

Right not sure how anyone could hate on that scenario...but I'm sure some would find a way lol.

That would be a very happy scenario for me. A talented young QB that is ready to start, a freak generational pass rushing prospect, use the rest of the draft to add players at WR, ILB, NT and C. Add some impact players in free agency, bewm.

Originally posted by NYniner85:

Right not sure how anyone could hate on that scenario...but I'm sure some would find a way lol.

Yeah if Jimmy sucks. Kind of cut and dry there.

Originally posted by tjd808185:

Originally posted by NYniner85:

Right not sure how anyone could hate on that scenario...but I'm sure some would find a way lol.

Yeah if Jimmy sucks. Kind of cut and dry there.

Same as if any of the college qbs suck atleast we could move on from JG in a yr or two if need be

Originally posted by NYniner85:

Same as if any of the college qbs suck

True, but I believe the top pick is the safer bet. Neither option is full proof or even that safe but more long term potential, smaller salary.

No we won't be able to move on from Jimmy because he will be extended.

Originally posted by tjd808185:

Originally posted by NYniner85:

Same as if any of the college qbs suck

True, but I believe the top pick is the safer bet. Neither option is full proof or even that safe but more long term potential, smaller salary.

I don't and like Trubisky...it would be different if there was a no brainer qb at the top but 90% of these college qbs are gonna have to be developed...at least Jimmy G has some seasoning to in in the NFL.

FYI im not saying don't go for Mitch but the options are much better getting JG with a 2nd in build the team.

Originally posted by tjd808185:
The Browns will do whatever they want we can't force them into anything. If they want Jimmy G they have 2 1sts and 2 2nds. They'll win any bidding war.

If they want Mitch they got 1st pick as of now.

Depends on what their analytics department believes is fair value for Garoppolo. No reason to expect them to get into a bidding war. But if the 49ers do acquire Garoppolo, that means there is one less QB on the market and there will be at least a couple QB hungry teams up to bat before Cleveland picks again in the 1st round.

the battle of the analytic powerhouses


sashi vs paraag

Originally posted by NYniner85:

I don't and like Trubisky...it would be different if there was a no brainer qb at the top but 90% of these college qbs are gonna have to be developed...at least Jimmy G has some seasoning to in in the NFL.

FYI im not saying don't go for Mitch but the options are much better getting JG with a 2nd in build the team.

We're 1-15 I'll take the development. It's a pipe dream to think we're going to have an over night turnaround.

I'm looking at what's our best option down the road.

Originally posted by tjd808185:

We're 1-15 I'll take the development. It's a pipe dream to think we're going to have an over night turnaround.

I'm looking at what's our best option down the road.

It would be different if Jimmy wasn't a promising young qb himself and a higher end draft pick.

Also I'll take anything to make the turnaround happen sooner than later.

I have no idea what it is you don't like about him as a qb other than the fact that he's played behind a HOF qb.

Dude can play football

I think Jimmy and Mitch would both be solid QBs that can hit their WRs under Chips watch. One thing is for sure. Go get Terrance Williams/Garcon and draft a wr within 2-3 rounds(probs move up with our third to second)

Originally posted by Phoenix49ers:

Depends on what their analytics department believes is fair value for Garoppolo. No reason to expect them to get into a bidding war. But if the 49ers do acquire Garoppolo, that means there is one less QB on the market and there will be at least a couple QB hungry teams up to bat before Cleveland picks again in the 1st round.

The more teams needing a qb means more teams taking those guys off the board. If us or the Bears landed Jimmy that could in theory hurt our chances because if Cleveland is willing to wait on whatever qb to drop (most likely if they prefer Watson) they no longer fear us taking a qb. They can go Garrett and we're just f'd.
Not f'd we get to trade Mitch for a nice little package. Just f'd out of Garrett.

I find it doubtful they would do that though since you want your guy not who falls. There's too much risk there.

Originally posted by tjd808185:

The more teams needing a qb means more teams taking those guys off the board. If us or the Bears landed Jimmy that could in theory hurt our chances because if Cleveland is willing to wait on whatever qb to drop (most likely if they prefer Watson) they no longer fear us taking a qb. They can go Garrett and we're just f'd.

I find it doubtful they would do that though since you want your guy not who falls. There's too much risk there.

Originally posted by NYniner85:

It would be different if Jimmy wasn't a promising young qb himself and a higher end draft pick.

Also I'll take anything to make the turnaround happen sooner than later.

I have no idea what it is you don't like about him as a qb other than the fact that he's played behind a HOF qb.

Dude can play football

With NE. It won't be that easy here and if you can't stay healthy does it matter? It's an assumption this could lead to a quicker turnaround.