There are 217 users in the forums

Jimmy Garoppolo-QB-EIU

Feb 23, 2017 at 11:45 AM
  • fan49
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 6,262
Originally posted by footballxpaul:
Originally posted by gold49digger:
Man after Osweiler I cannot get behind Jimmy G. It's easy to look good with an amazing supporting cast around you.

osweiler didn't look good ever. He was only ok when he played with Broncos

LMAO!!!! WHat amazing cast? Wr's mediocre, no gronk??? Tom brady and bellicheck are the reason they win. NOt some amazing recievers
Feb 23, 2017 at 12:09 PM
Originally posted by gold49digger:
Man after Osweiler I cannot get behind Jimmy G. It's easy to look good with an amazing supporting cast around you.
Osweiler was a project at best when drafted back then. Garoppolo, however, was drafted in round 2 for a reason.

http://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/18725360/is-jimmy-garoppolo-overhyped-budding-star-new-england-patriots-2017-nfl-offseason
Matt Bowen would pull the trigger.
Feb 23, 2017 at 12:09 PM
Originally posted by fan49:
LMAO!!!! WHat amazing cast? Wr's mediocre, no gronk??? Tom brady and bellicheck are the reason they win. NOt some amazing recievers

amazing cast does not necessarily mean great wrs. Belichick alone makes him look good. Heck even Brisset looked solid during his time.
Feb 23, 2017 at 12:13 PM
Originally posted by communist:
Originally posted by gold49digger:
Man after Osweiler I cannot get behind Jimmy G. It's easy to look good with an amazing supporting cast around you.
Osweiler was a project at best when drafted back then. Garoppolo, however, was drafted in round 2 for a reason.

http://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/18725360/is-jimmy-garoppolo-overhyped-budding-star-new-england-patriots-2017-nfl-offseason
Matt Bowen would pull the trigger.

alright. if kyle believes he is the guy and trades for him, i will be behind him 100%. Im just scared that we will pay him big time money and he will suck. We are lucky kap made such a team friendly deal (which i bet he regrets doing now).
Feb 23, 2017 at 12:42 PM
Originally posted by gold49digger:
Originally posted by communist:
Originally posted by gold49digger:
Man after Osweiler I cannot get behind Jimmy G. It's easy to look good with an amazing supporting cast around you.
Osweiler was a project at best when drafted back then. Garoppolo, however, was drafted in round 2 for a reason.

http://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/18725360/is-jimmy-garoppolo-overhyped-budding-star-new-england-patriots-2017-nfl-offseason
Matt Bowen would pull the trigger.

alright. if kyle believes he is the guy and trades for him, i will be behind him 100%. Im just scared that we will pay him big time money and he will suck. We are lucky kap made such a team friendly deal (which i bet he regrets doing now).
i dont give a rats where someone was picked. it doesn't mean they were good. it just means they were a priority

What does matter is can they play. and JG can't even last more then 5.5 qtrs. that is not worth trading and paying for
Feb 23, 2017 at 1:03 PM
  • fan49
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 6,262
Originally posted by gold49digger:
Originally posted by fan49:
LMAO!!!! WHat amazing cast? Wr's mediocre, no gronk??? Tom brady and bellicheck are the reason they win. NOt some amazing recievers

amazing cast does not necessarily mean great wrs. Belichick alone makes him look good. Heck even Brisset looked solid during his time.

not as good as jimmy. 4 td's vs 1. and jimmy was more accurate
Feb 23, 2017 at 1:45 PM
Originally posted by gold49digger:
Originally posted by fan49:
LMAO!!!! WHat amazing cast? Wr's mediocre, no gronk??? Tom brady and bellicheck are the reason they win. NOt some amazing recievers

amazing cast does not necessarily mean great wrs. Belichick alone makes him look good. Heck even Brisset looked solid during his time.

Brissett looked horrible. Did more running than throwing it seemed.
Feb 23, 2017 at 1:50 PM
Originally posted by JustinNiner:
Originally posted by gold49digger:
Originally posted by fan49:
LMAO!!!! WHat amazing cast? Wr's mediocre, no gronk??? Tom brady and bellicheck are the reason they win. NOt some amazing recievers

amazing cast does not necessarily mean great wrs. Belichick alone makes him look good. Heck even Brisset looked solid during his time.

Brissett looked horrible. Did more running than throwing it seemed.
it seemed

but the times he threw , he had a high comp %. this is from a Rookie compared to JG 3 yrs in the league
Feb 23, 2017 at 2:12 PM
Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:
Originally posted by JustinNiner:
Originally posted by gold49digger:
Originally posted by fan49:
LMAO!!!! WHat amazing cast? Wr's mediocre, no gronk??? Tom brady and bellicheck are the reason they win. NOt some amazing recievers

amazing cast does not necessarily mean great wrs. Belichick alone makes him look good. Heck even Brisset looked solid during his time.

Brissett looked horrible. Did more running than throwing it seemed.
it seemed

but the times he threw , he had a high comp %. this is from a Rookie compared to JG 3 yrs in the league
Have you even read a single sentence of the article by Bowen? Apparently not.
Feb 23, 2017 at 3:19 PM
Originally posted by communist:
Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:
Originally posted by JustinNiner:
Originally posted by gold49digger:
Originally posted by fan49:
LMAO!!!! WHat amazing cast? Wr's mediocre, no gronk??? Tom brady and bellicheck are the reason they win. NOt some amazing recievers

amazing cast does not necessarily mean great wrs. Belichick alone makes him look good. Heck even Brisset looked solid during his time.

Brissett looked horrible. Did more running than throwing it seemed.
it seemed

but the times he threw , he had a high comp %. this is from a Rookie compared to JG 3 yrs in the league
Have you even read a single sentence of the article by Bowen? Apparently not.
what does that article say about Brisset ?
[ Edited by 49AllTheTime on Feb 23, 2017 at 3:22 PM ]
Feb 23, 2017 at 3:25 PM
  • fan49
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 6,262
Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:
Originally posted by gold49digger:
Originally posted by communist:
Originally posted by gold49digger:
Man after Osweiler I cannot get behind Jimmy G. It's easy to look good with an amazing supporting cast around you.
Osweiler was a project at best when drafted back then. Garoppolo, however, was drafted in round 2 for a reason.

http://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/18725360/is-jimmy-garoppolo-overhyped-budding-star-new-england-patriots-2017-nfl-offseason
Matt Bowen would pull the trigger.

alright. if kyle believes he is the guy and trades for him, i will be behind him 100%. Im just scared that we will pay him big time money and he will suck. We are lucky kap made such a team friendly deal (which i bet he regrets doing now).
i dont give a rats where someone was picked. it doesn't mean they were good. it just means they were a priority

What does matter is can they play. and JG can't even last more then 5.5 qtrs. that is not worth trading and paying for

obviously you dont know about injuries. dude got hit the way smith did when he broke his collar bone. He obviously was hurt as most qb's would have been. It was the landing not the hit. I cant remember the name ogf the injury but I do remember if he didnt rest he would have formed a lump on his shoulder. Which Im sure would have been great for his arm.
Feb 23, 2017 at 3:26 PM
  • fan49
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 6,262
Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:
Originally posted by communist:
Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:
Originally posted by JustinNiner:
Originally posted by gold49digger:
Originally posted by fan49:
LMAO!!!! WHat amazing cast? Wr's mediocre, no gronk??? Tom brady and bellicheck are the reason they win. NOt some amazing recievers

amazing cast does not necessarily mean great wrs. Belichick alone makes him look good. Heck even Brisset looked solid during his time.

Brissett looked horrible. Did more running than throwing it seemed.
it seemed

but the times he threw , he had a high comp %. this is from a Rookie compared to JG 3 yrs in the league
Have you even read a single sentence of the article by Bowen? Apparently not.
what does that article say about Brisset ?

if im right bgrisset threw 60 percent jimmy threw 68. He was obviously out performed. All I see is haters.
[ Edited by fan49 on Feb 23, 2017 at 3:26 PM ]
Feb 23, 2017 at 3:40 PM
  • fan49
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 6,262
In 2.5 games played brissett threw 400 yards, no td's, 61.8% accuracy, and a 83.9 rating his QB rating was 46 lmao

In 1.5 games JImmy threw 502 yards, 4 td's 68.3% accuracy, and a 113.3 rating his QB rating was 88.7. HUGE DIFFERENCE
Feb 23, 2017 at 3:50 PM
Originally posted by fan49:
In 2.5 games played brissett threw 400 yards, no td's, 61.8% accuracy, and a 83.9 rating his QB rating was 46 lmao

In 1.5 games JImmy threw 502 yards, 4 td's 68.3% accuracy, and a 113.3 rating his QB rating was 88.7. HUGE DIFFERENCE
not bad for a rookie vs a 3 year vet that needed all offseason
Feb 23, 2017 at 5:52 PM
  • Rascal
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 13,926
Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:
Originally posted by fan49:
In 2.5 games played brissett threw 400 yards, no td's, 61.8% accuracy, and a 83.9 rating his QB rating was 46 lmao

In 1.5 games JImmy threw 502 yards, 4 td's 68.3% accuracy, and a 113.3 rating his QB rating was 88.7. HUGE DIFFERENCE
not bad for a rookie vs a 3 year vet that needed all offseason

A vet that hadn't played a down in the regular season until that point.

Alright, why don't you trade for Brissett then?
Search
YouTube
Flipboard
Bluesky
Threads
✕
Search Share 49ersWebzone