Originally posted by Kolohe:
Originally posted by JaggedJ:
Originally posted by Kolohe:
Originally posted by JaggedJ:
Originally posted by jersey49er:
Originally posted by FredFlintstone:
Originally posted by jersey49er:
Originally posted by elguapo:
Originally posted by pdizo916:
Originally posted by NYniner85:
Fake?
If they did they are off their damn rocker
I'm thinking the plan is to trade for Teddy,maybe a 3rd next year then trade Jimmy for a 2nd, and them move up in the draft for a QB while Teddy starts next year to give the rook time, save $ and get a better pick.
If that's their plan they're dumb as f**k because Bridgewater is a downgrade add the fact you piss off the the locker room and you have to hope he picks the system up quick. Don't think they get where they can if he's the starter, rather have Jimmy then draft a qb.
I bet they are thinking $, save almost 10 million with teddy, they don't want to pay Jimmy bc he's not worth it plus his high chance of injuries
Don't we save more money with Darnold? If it's about money then Darnold is the better option unless the Jets are asking for way more than the Panthers in compensation.
Darnold has been too s**tty to give up anything more than a 2nd round pick. Hard pass. How is he even an upgrade to Jimmy G??
Depends on the perspective I guess.
Is Darnold plus 19mil minus a 2nd...
...equal lesser or better than...
Jimmy minus 27mil plus a 2nd?
I'll leave that one for those still interested in the Jimmy debate but for me outside of Watson any move to replace Jimmy is a $$$ saving exercise more than anything else and on that front there's more value in Darnold than Bridgewater.
But why would they save money now when there's really no need to?? The 49ers are sitting comfortable right now in terms of cap space.
The question you got to ask is do you see Jimmy G as the future QB of Niners. If the answer is no, then I think it is unacceptable to be paying him what we are going to be paying him this season. It is just not in the best long-term interest of the team to pay him that kind of money if your plan is to replace him.
The 49ers are not that comfortable in cap space. Considering the number of players we have entering free agency. There are some massive holes we got to fill either by bringing players back, new free agents, or the final option of the draft. 23 mil in cap space might not be getting us as far as you think. Bringing Trent Williams back alone is going to cost somewhere around 20 mil. That would still leave us with huge glaring holes on the offensive line and in the secondary.
I will just use Darnold as an example. but you could potentially sign a cheaper vet with a rookie QB and save more money. 8 mil saved by swapping Jimmy for Darnold might not seem like a lot. But if you put it in these terms I think a lot more fans would be on board for it.
Would you rather have.....
Jimmy G and a terrible center or Darnold and Alex Mack?
Jimmy G and a huge hole at cornerback or Darnold and Verret.
Darnold and Trent Willams or Jimmy g and a poorer quality LT
Darnold and A pass rusher to compliment Bosa Or Jimmy G and no one.
I think when you put things in those terms more people would be looking to move on from Jimmy. Again more could be gained if we went even cheaper than someone like Darnold and went with a cheaper Vet Qb to pair with a Rookie.
[ Edited by Bloodless on Mar 7, 2021 at 10:30 AM ]