There are 253 users in the forums

Bobby Wagner anyone?

  • Kolohe
  • Hall of Fame
  • Posts: 63,517
Originally posted by Hopper:
Originally posted by Kolohe:
Originally posted by Hopper:
+ Show all quotes
If he wasn't overvaluing himself why was he unsigned for so long? Keep in mind he finally signed a contract less than a week before the regular season opener.

How was he overvaluing himself?? Obviously he got three times more than what Lynch offered him. And coming off a 86 tackle 2 sack 1 FF season, you would think he's worth more than $1 million right. I mean he's not just any ole LB, he does have a history of being more than serviceable.

Pretty obvious. No team wanted him at the price he thought he was worth.

And what price was that?? All it takes is one team to want you or in his case two teams. Like I said he got triple than what he was low balled.

Would love to have him. But this is a position of strength. Whatever holes we have on defense LB isn't one of them. We'll be better served spending the money elsewhere.
Originally posted by 9ersLiferInChicago:

Would love to have him. But this is a position of strength. Whatever holes we have on defense LB isn't one of them. We'll be better served spending the money elsewhere.

We drafted Solomon Thomas and Javon Kinlaw when defensive line was our position of strength too. Im not saying the situations are the same, but just pointing that out.
Sign him just so we don't have to face him twice a year
lol nm i read it wrong
[ Edited by Heroism on Mar 10, 2022 at 11:07 AM ]
  • thl408
  • Moderator
  • Posts: 33,099
Originally posted by SteveWallacesHelmet:
Originally posted by 9ersLiferInChicago:

Would love to have him. But this is a position of strength. Whatever holes we have on defense LB isn't one of them. We'll be better served spending the money elsewhere.

We drafted Solomon Thomas and Javon Kinlaw when defensive line was our position of strength too. Im not saying the situations are the same, but just pointing that out.

You can rotate DL. No team rotates LBs for the sake of keeping them fresh.
  • Kolohe
  • Hall of Fame
  • Posts: 63,517
Originally posted by 9ersLiferInChicago:

Would love to have him. But this is a position of strength. Whatever holes we have on defense LB isn't one of them. We'll be better served spending the money elsewhere.

I wouldn't say that LB is a position of strength when Greenlaw and even Al-Shaair have been injured a lot. IMO if you have an opportunity to get a LB like Wagner you do it no question!!! But if it will hinder the chances of getting a decent CB or top level CB then I'd pass.
Originally posted by thl408:
Originally posted by Willisfn4life:
Originally posted by evil:
What position he playing? We already got Dre, Fred and Al-Shaair.

If it don't make dollars it don't make sense.

I don't buy the report as linebacker is far from a need for this team but playing hypotheticals. Wagner has missed 2 games since 2014. I'm sure the durability plus would come into play. My guess is Wagner would play WILL and Greenlaw would shift to the other side. Also im sure the niners recognize that Warners play declined much of last season. He seemed to get it back by the end but maybe they think having a guy like Wagner around would be good for Warner's confidence.

It's not that Wagner wouldn't be an upgrade, it's that there are other areas of the team to use free agency money on, including not spending free agency money so that it can be set aside for Deebo/Bosa. CB, S, Edge depth, are all better use of cap than signing Wagner to a multiyear.

Note my first sentence. I'm just throwing out hypothetical discussion points. Like I said linebacker is not a need for this team and I don't buy the report.
Originally posted by Heroism:
lol nm i read it wrong

You edited before I could respond.
  • thl408
  • Moderator
  • Posts: 33,099
Originally posted by Willisfn4life:
Originally posted by thl408:
Originally posted by Willisfn4life:
+ Show all quotes
I don't buy the report as linebacker is far from a need for this team but playing hypotheticals. Wagner has missed 2 games since 2014. I'm sure the durability plus would come into play. My guess is Wagner would play WILL and Greenlaw would shift to the other side. Also im sure the niners recognize that Warners play declined much of last season. He seemed to get it back by the end but maybe they think having a guy like Wagner around would be good for Warner's confidence.

It's not that Wagner wouldn't be an upgrade, it's that there are other areas of the team to use free agency money on, including not spending free agency money so that it can be set aside for Deebo/Bosa. CB, S, Edge depth, are all better use of cap than signing Wagner to a multiyear.

Note my first sentence. I'm just throwing out hypothetical discussion points. Like I said linebacker is not a need for this team and I don't buy the report.

I misread your first sentence. My bad.
Only interested if we trade away Greenlaw.
  • Hopper
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 12,083
Originally posted by Kolohe:
Originally posted by Hopper:
Originally posted by Kolohe:
+ Show all quotes
How was he overvaluing himself?? Obviously he got three times more than what Lynch offered him. And coming off a 86 tackle 2 sack 1 FF season, you would think he's worth more than $1 million right. I mean he's not just any ole LB, he does have a history of being more than serviceable.

Pretty obvious. No team wanted him at the price he thought he was worth.

And what price was that?? All it takes is one team to want you or in his case two teams. Like I said he got triple than what he was low balled.

I seriously doubt 1y/3m was the deal he wanted at the start of free agency. That's more than likely the deal he had to settle for after being unsigned for five months.
Originally posted by Willisfn4life:
Originally posted by Heroism:
lol nm i read it wrong

You edited before I could respond.

Bwahaha.
Originally posted by thl408:
Originally posted by Willisfn4life:
Originally posted by thl408:
+ Show all quotes
It's not that Wagner wouldn't be an upgrade, it's that there are other areas of the team to use free agency money on, including not spending free agency money so that it can be set aside for Deebo/Bosa. CB, S, Edge depth, are all better use of cap than signing Wagner to a multiyear.

Note my first sentence. I'm just throwing out hypothetical discussion points. Like I said linebacker is not a need for this team and I don't buy the report.

I misread your first sentence. My bad.

  • Kolohe
  • Hall of Fame
  • Posts: 63,517
Originally posted by Hopper:
Originally posted by Kolohe:
Originally posted by Hopper:
+ Show all quotes
Pretty obvious. No team wanted him at the price he thought he was worth.

And what price was that?? All it takes is one team to want you or in his case two teams. Like I said he got triple than what he was low balled.

I seriously doubt 1y/3m was the deal he wanted at the start of free agency. That's more than likely the deal he had to settle for after being unsigned for five months.

You still didn't answer the question, what price was that??

Wright know his age and the state of his career, I'm pretty sure he wasn't looking for a 4 year $40 million contract.
Theme: Auto • LightDark
Search Share 49ersWebzone