There are 251 users in the forums

2nd mock realistic

Originally posted by yung_prophet_one:
i see why alot of u guys are saying no to Tim williams after his no show but he had a bad game doesnt mean hes not a high potential player...i like him more than Barnett by a hair so if u guys dont like williams ill be ok with Barnett

Tim Williams is more just a pass rush specialist. Barnett can rush the passer and plays the run well imo
Don't like Howard we have about 50 million tied up in our TEs. I think we need a ILB over a OLB. And we definitely need a wr.
Originally posted by CorvaNinerFan:
I'd definitely avoid V Jackson and NT Ian Williams...both way too injury prone & Jackson's 34. Better WR options: Terrelle Pryor, Kenny Britt, Cordarelle Patterson, Michael Floyd, Pierre Garcon. There are some better NT's available than Branch, IMHO. Guys like Poe, Brandon Williams & Bennie Logan for example.

I'm not sure what the Jets' motivation would be to move up 4 spots...they're another team with multiple needs, so why give up a couple of high picks to move up 4 spots.

In the draft, you'd really take Michael Williams at #6? If I was going pass rusher, it's Barnett, all day long. He had almost double the overall tackles, 18 for loss, 12 sacks, 3 passes broken up, and a pick. McDaniels (assuming he's the HC) might lobby hard for best WR on the board.

Howard's a very good TE, but I actually like Leggett better for his all around game. Another possibility is Engram, who's an outstanding receiving TE, but not much of a blocker.

Clement's a good RB, but all things being equal otherwise, I'd take Kareem Hunt because he had 4 times the receptions and receiving yards than Clement did.

Good post Corva!

In essentially building a new team, I'd avoid guys w/injuries.

And IMO, Barnett is going to be incredible.

I really liked the Klien pick in FA
I'd be upset if this was the offseason. Jackson needs to retire. It's too high for Williams there and there is no QB depth
Search Share 49ersWebzone