LISTEN: Looking For The 49ers' New DC With Jason Aponte →

There are 382 users in the forums

2017 NFL Mock Draft: Browns trade for No. 2 pick, then take Garrett and Trubisky 1-2

The Browns have been amassing draft capital, and they finally cash some in to secure the No. 2 pick by R.J. White

The story in the top half of this year's draft will be what the Browns do as they continue to rebuild their franchise with an eye at finally building a playoff contender.

Owners of the No. 1 and No. 12 overall picks, the Browns have many different paths heading into the draft, but the main question they have to answer is whether to go all-in with Mitchell Trubisky as their quarterback of the future, or to take Myles Garrett No. 1 overall and cross their fingers that Trubisky will be available when they're back on the clock.

The 49ers and Bears have 2017 starters in place, but those players won't preclude them from drafting Trubisky if they're sold on him long-term. The Jaguars could move on from Blake Bortles at any time if they find a more inspiring option. The Jets have possibly the worst quarterback situation in the league. And while the Chargers, Bills and Saints have starters in place, each is on the lookout for their next franchise quarterback. Several other teams could also trade into the top 12 and grab the quarterback.

So if you're the Browns, what do you do? Hope that Trubisky gets by all those teams and makes it to No. 12? Hope the Patriots do decide to trade Jimmy Garoppolo for a manageable cost?

The latter seems unlikely at this point, while the former seems more wishcasting than a strategy to pursue in the draft.

Of course, there's a third option available: If the Browns do decide they have to have Trubisky as their next franchise quarterback -- and if they liked what they saw at Friday's private workout, that may be the case -- they've accumulated enough ammunition to trade up from No. 12.

That's what I have the Browns doing in this mock, striking a trade with the 49ers to move all the way up to No. 2. What would that cost? The Rams moved from No. 15 to No. 1 last year, while the Eagles moved from No. 8 to No. 2. It's reasonable to expect a Browns' move to No. 2 to cost somewhere between those prices. The former deal cost the Rams two seconds and a third in 2016, as well as a first and third in 2017 (and they also received a fourth and a sixth). The latter deal cost the Eagles a third and fourth in 2016 as well as a first in 2017 and a second in 2018 (and they also picked up a fourth).

The Browns have two second-round picks, a third, a fourth, three fifths and two sixths in 2017, as well as all their original picks in 2018 plus two extra seconds, another fourth, and another sixth. Would the 49ers take the 12th, 33rd and 108th picks this year as well as next year's first and third? Considering how many needs they have to address, it's certainly possible. That would leave the Browns with two Day 2 picks and five Day 3 picks this year, as well as nine picks in 2018.

Since we're dabbling in the realm of fantasy here, let's go ahead and strike that trade, guaranteeing the Browns both Garrett and Trubisky at the top of the draft and presumably green-lighting the funding for "Draft Day 2" in the process.

One more note: You'll find what I believe to be the top needs of each team listed before each pick. Selections won't necessarily line up perfectly with needs -- when do they ever? -- but in certain situations a need can be too glaring to ignore.
http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/news/2017-nfl-mock-draft-browns-trade-for-no-2-pick-then-take-garrett-and-trubisky-1-2/
[ Edited by Ronnie49Lott on Apr 1, 2017 at 4:47 PM ]
I like that deal if it were an option, we could still land a day 1 starter with the 12th pick, and Day 2 we'd have the first 2 picks, which would have good value to us to keep or trade for even more picks down the line. Netting an extra 1st and 3rd in next years draft would be huge towards keeping good young talent coming in each year.
Originally posted by Bobdawg78:
I like that deal if it were an option, we could still land a day 1 starter with the 12th pick, and Day 2 we'd have the first 2 picks, which would have good value to us to keep or trade for even more picks down the line. Netting an extra 1st and 3rd in next years draft would be huge towards keeping good young talent coming in each year.

That deal would be great for us, especially considering the 1st round pick we'd get from Cleveland next year will probably be 1st overall.
I agree, Cleveland will easily have a Top 5 pick next year. If this deal was presented, Lynch would have to take it on sheer volume of assets he'd be getting. NO BRAINER.
Originally posted by Bobdawg78:
I agree, Cleveland will easily have a Top 5 pick next year. If this deal was presented, Lynch would have to take it on sheer volume of assets he'd be getting. NO BRAINER.

Agreed
I love this scenario. 👍
Clv is way too obsessed with picks to trade away their #1 next year. Obviously on our end we do that in a heartbeat but that just doesn't seem like something Clv wouldn't do. Take Garrett and up with Kizer at qb is a Clv move though.
[ Edited by tjd808185 on Apr 2, 2017 at 11:42 AM ]
They want him bad enougn we should rape tha browns #12 both 2nd round picks and a 1st & 3rd in 2018 or go away
Are the browns seriously brownsy enough to do this???
Don't know what their new front office will do. The Browns new money ball team has been acccumulating a ton of picks, but it may be to use them not trade them. Guess we better hope the Browns fall in love with Trubisky or one of the other QB's.
Originally posted by Bobdawg78:
I agree, Cleveland will easily have a Top 5 pick next year. If this deal was presented, Lynch would have to take it on sheer volume of assets he'd be getting. NO BRAINER.

yep and we can build our team up in the draft this year and use that CLE 1st pick to get our QB. 2018 QB draft class is loaded
Originally posted by tohara3:
Originally posted by Bobdawg78:
I agree, Cleveland will easily have a Top 5 pick next year. If this deal was presented, Lynch would have to take it on sheer volume of assets he'd be getting. NO BRAINER.

Agreed

No question.
Originally posted by JustinNiner:
Originally posted by Bobdawg78:
I agree, Cleveland will easily have a Top 5 pick next year. If this deal was presented, Lynch would have to take it on sheer volume of assets he'd be getting. NO BRAINER.

yep and we can build our team up in the draft this year and use that CLE 1st pick to get our QB. 2018 QB draft class is loaded

idk if it's loaded, but we definitely would be in a position to take the best QB available.

I love this scenario. As for Cleveland, if they are that sure of Mitch Trubisky, I have no problem with this trade on their end. They come away with players at the two most important positions, where honestly, I think the bust rate is very low, still can add some talent later in the draft, and placate the fan base a bit. Very pricey move though.
Search Share 49ersWebzone