Trade down from 9 to 22 with Buffalo…. Pick-up An extra 2nd and 3rd rd pick from Buffalo.
21 trade down to 26 and pick-up another 4th rd pick.
26th Overall: Isiah Wynn, OT-OG, Georgia or Billy Price OG-C, Ohio State
Trade up from 53 to 35 (give up our 53RD pick, the 4th rd pick we got from Atlanta and a future 3rd rd pick)
#35 Overall: Derrius Guice, RB, LSU or Ronald Jones, RB, USC
#57: Leighton Vander Esch, DE-OLB, Boise State
#70 Auden Tate, WR, Florida State (or St. Brown from Notre Dame)
#74 J.C Jackson, CB, Maryland
4th Rd Pick: Brett Toth, OT, Army
Yes, I go offense hard on this mock draft. I fully expect us to sign a real good FA Cornerback. I am hoping that guy is Trumaine Johnson but at worse I think we end up adding a good corner in FA. I also think we will sign a pass rusher in FA. I think we make a run at Ezekiel Ansah. So I think we will utilize the draft to add weapons and protection from Jimmy G.
There are 252 users in the forums
Mock with a lot of trading and probably a lot of hate
Feb 9, 2018 at 9:43 AM
- StubbyNBY
- Veteran
- Posts: 4,749
Feb 9, 2018 at 10:08 AM
- Dillesq
- Member
- Posts: 1,512
I like everything you did up until pick 35. I hate everything you did after it lol. Van Der Esch isnt great in space so I don't like him for our defense. Would prefer a fast guy like Darius Leonard. I'd rather have EQ St Brown or Dj Moore over Tate and both should be there at 70. I would rather have a guy like Holton Hill at pick 74 over JC Jackson.
Feb 9, 2018 at 10:25 AM
- NYniner85
- Veteran
- Posts: 111,546
Okay so we got both of buffalo's 1sts? If not there's no way this trade is done.
Guice is not gonna be there in the 2nd just not...he's gonna run like a 4.4 at 220 lbs he's got elite vision/balance/power imo.
I'm not a Tate fan either.
Would love Guice and Wynn
Guice is not gonna be there in the 2nd just not...he's gonna run like a 4.4 at 220 lbs he's got elite vision/balance/power imo.
I'm not a Tate fan either.
Would love Guice and Wynn
Feb 9, 2018 at 10:55 AM
- StubbyNBY
- Veteran
- Posts: 4,749
Originally posted by NYniner85:
Okay so we got both of buffalo's 1sts? If not there's no way this trade is done.
Guice is not gonna be there in the 2nd just not...he's gonna run like a 4.4 at 220 lbs he's got elite vision/balance/power imo.
I'm not a Tate fan either.
Would love Guice and Wynn
No, One of Buffalo's first rd picks plus their 2nd rd and 4th rd pick
Feb 9, 2018 at 5:35 PM
- m_brockalexander
- Veteran
- Posts: 13,261
Regardless of how you got the picks, here's my thoughts:
- either Wynn or Price would be a nice start to the draft at a position of need.
- Guice will not make it out of the first round IMO, but Michel or Jones at that spot wouldn't be bad.
- definitely think the Niners would take any of the edge rushers available in the late 2nd over Vander Esch
- two nice picks in the third
- Toth would be a good pick if he didn't have his 2 yr active duty commitment to fulfill. Way too early for a throwaway pick.
- either Wynn or Price would be a nice start to the draft at a position of need.
- Guice will not make it out of the first round IMO, but Michel or Jones at that spot wouldn't be bad.
- definitely think the Niners would take any of the edge rushers available in the late 2nd over Vander Esch
- two nice picks in the third
- Toth would be a good pick if he didn't have his 2 yr active duty commitment to fulfill. Way too early for a throwaway pick.
Feb 9, 2018 at 11:22 PM
- SmokeCrabtrees
- Veteran
- Posts: 15,580
Originally posted by StubbyNBY:Originally posted by NYniner85:Okay so we got both of buffalo's 1sts? If not there's no way this trade is done.
Guice is not gonna be there in the 2nd just not...he's gonna run like a 4.4 at 220 lbs he's got elite vision/balance/power imo.
I'm not a Tate fan either.
Would love Guice and Wynn
No, One of Buffalo's first rd picks plus their 2nd rd and 4th rd pick
You said 2nd and 3rd above lol.
Anyhoot NY technically Guice can be there at 26 and we take Wynn/Price or Daniels at 35
Feb 10, 2018 at 10:35 AM
- StubbyNBY
- Veteran
- Posts: 4,749
Originally posted by m_brockalexander:
Regardless of how you got the picks, here's my thoughts:
- either Wynn or Price would be a nice start to the draft at a position of need.
- Guice will not make it out of the first round IMO, but Michel or Jones at that spot wouldn't be bad.
- definitely think the Niners would take any of the edge rushers available in the late 2nd over Vander Esch
- two nice picks in the third
- Toth would be a good pick if he didn't have his 2 yr active duty commitment to fulfill. Way too early for a throwaway pick.
Thanks for the 411
Feb 10, 2018 at 10:36 AM
- StubbyNBY
- Veteran
- Posts: 4,749
Originally posted by SmokeCrabtrees:
You said 2nd and 3rd above lol.
Anyhoot NY technically Guice can be there at 26 and we take Wynn/Price or Daniels at 35
Could be.... Though I think Price and Wynn will end up being first rounders, especially Price. I really like Wynn, he's becoming one of my draft crushes, same for Ronald Jones. I like Jones more than Guice. I think both will be very good NFL RB's though
Feb 10, 2018 at 11:01 AM
- NYniner85
- Veteran
- Posts: 111,546
Originally posted by StubbyNBY:Originally posted by NYniner85:Okay so we got both of buffalo's 1sts? If not there's no way this trade is done.
Guice is not gonna be there in the 2nd just not...he's gonna run like a 4.4 at 220 lbs he's got elite vision/balance/power imo.
I'm not a Tate fan either.
Would love Guice and Wynn
No, One of Buffalo's first rd picks plus their 2nd rd and 4th rd pick
So we're moving from 9th to 21st for a 2nd and 4th...no way am I moving down that far for that. They'd better be throwing a future pick.
Feb 10, 2018 at 11:02 AM
- NYniner85
- Veteran
- Posts: 111,546
Originally posted by StubbyNBY:Could be.... Though I think Price and Wynn will end up being first rounders, especially Price. I really like Wynn, he's becoming one of my draft crushes, same for Ronald Jones. I like Jones more than Guice. I think both will be very good NFL RB's though
Guice is by far a more complete RB than jones. Like both a lot would be happy with either. Too each their own