There are 250 users in the forums
Originally posted by NYniner85:Originally posted by SmokeCrabtrees:If Barrett is tagged with a 2nd round tender we could be in a prime position to pull the trigger since the Saints pick is late.
Gross give up a 2nd and have to pay him top money, dude has 11 career sacks come on meow
Originally posted by jersey49er:Originally posted by NYniner85:Originally posted by SmokeCrabtrees:If Barrett is tagged with a 2nd round tender we could be in a prime position to pull the trigger since the Saints pick is late.
Gross give up a 2nd and have to pay him top money, dude has 11 career sacks come on meow
Did you just say meow ?
Originally posted by adrianlesnar:
Originally posted by NYniner85:
Yeah I don't see the point in them not keeping Barnett at all, like I said it will cost them nothing this yr to tender him. If someone offers him a contract they get a 2nd, as far as next yr worry about next yr...if he moves on they get a 3rd rd comp anyway. There's a ton of ways for them to clear space outside of getting rid of a cheap young good player.
FWIW they can cut Thomas next yr and save $14 million if they don't have cap space (currently next yr they have $51 million).
Still hate the thought of moving down for a 2019 swap no thanks...you also said we got a 3rd but I don't see it in your mock?
Traded away a 3rd round pick to Denver, but recouped one from AZ
Originally posted by jersey49er:
Originally posted by NYniner85:
Originally posted by SmokeCrabtrees:
If Barrett is tagged with a 2nd round tender we could be in a prime position to pull the trigger since the Saints pick is late.
Gross give up a 2nd and have to pay him top money, dude has 11 career sacks come on meow
Did you just say meow ?
Originally posted by SmokeCrabtrees:
He was stuck behind DemarcUs,Von and Ray. Who knows what we think of him.
Originally posted by NYniner85:Originally posted by SmokeCrabtrees:He was stuck behind DemarcUs,Von and Ray. Who knows what we think of him.
It's a horrible move IMO...not only are you giving up your 2nd which could land a good young prospect (on a rookie contract) BUT you're also paying him enough money that Denver will not match (in the hopes that he does something).
no thanks my man.
Originally posted by SmokeCrabtrees:Originally posted by NYniner85:Originally posted by SmokeCrabtrees:He was stuck behind DemarcUs,Von and Ray. Who knows what we think of him.
It's a horrible move IMO...not only are you giving up your 2nd which could land a good young prospect (on a rookie contract) BUT you're also paying him enough money that Denver will not match (in the hopes that he does something).
no thanks my man.
What if we think he can be a day one 10+ sack guy?
I get your point.
Originally posted by English:err, do we think that?
Originally posted by English:Originally posted by SmokeCrabtrees:Originally posted by NYniner85:Originally posted by SmokeCrabtrees:He was stuck behind DemarcUs,Von and Ray. Who knows what we think of him.
It's a horrible move IMO...not only are you giving up your 2nd which could land a good young prospect (on a rookie contract) BUT you're also paying him enough money that Denver will not match (in the hopes that he does something).
no thanks my man.
What if we think he can be a day one 10+ sack guy?
I get your point.
err, do we think that?
Originally posted by SmokeCrabtrees:
If rest of our DL brings it.. I think Marsh can be a 7-8 sack guy. Why can't Barrett get 10? To be honest I haven't watched much of him, just going off circumstances and word of mouth.
Originally posted by NYniner85:Originally posted by SmokeCrabtrees:If rest of our DL brings it.. I think Marsh can be a 7-8 sack guy. Why can't Barrett get 10? To be honest I haven't watched much of him, just going off circumstances and word of mouth.
Smoke you smoking too much
Can we get Von Miller on the other side if we get Barrett?
