9MOON'S POST COMBINE 49ER DRAFT W/TRADES

Trading out of the 31st spot, Chicago sends us their two 2nd rounders (# 43 and #50)

Trading out of the 43rd spot, Las Vegas sends us their 2 of 3 third rounders (# 80 and 91)

Moving up to the 114th spot, we sent PittsburgH this years 5th & 6th (159 & 191) rounders

BELOW IS THE DRAFT RESULT

1 - 31) Chicago Bears

2a - 43 from Bears) SF - Isaiah Wilson; OT - Georgia

2b - 50 trade w/Raiders from Bears) Las Vegas Raiders

3a - 80 from Raiders) SF - Cameron Dantzler; CB - Miss State

3b - 91 from Raiders) SF - Raekwon Davis; DT - Alabama

4 - 114 trade w/Pittsburgh) SF - Dominik Eberle; PK - Utah State

5a - 139) SF - Collin Johnson; WR - Texas

5b - 159) PITT

6 - 191) PITT

7a - 195) SF - Anthony Gordon; QB - Washington State

7b - 222) SF - Shaq Smith; ILB - Clemson

Don't like any of the picks except Collin Johnson. Trade downs are reasonable but the picks are not.

yes, I went with the best player available...

Originally posted by m_brockalexander:

Don't like any of the picks except Collin Johnson. Trade downs are reasonable but the picks are not.

Trade downs reasonable? The Chicago trade is very unrealistic. No way the Bears do that.

Why would the bears massively over pay to move up to 31? Who's their target? Why are we reaching on a RT? Why is Pitt allowing us to massively rip them off? Why are we trading up for a PK?

Originally posted by Kalen49ers:

Originally posted by m_brockalexander:
Don't like any of the picks except Collin Johnson. Trade downs are reasonable but the picks are not.

Trade downs reasonable? The Chicago trade is very unrealistic. No way the Bears do that.

The Bears saw Jonathan Taylor sitting in the Green Room playing slot machines and decided to move up the 1st round since they didn't have any... and also think that this kid will help young Bisquit develop as a QB..

Originally posted by Kalen49ers:

Originally posted by m_brockalexander:
Don't like any of the picks except Collin Johnson. Trade downs are reasonable but the picks are not.

Trade downs reasonable? The Chicago trade is very unrealistic. No way the Bears do that.

Maybe I should have re-phrased that. Like the fact that the Niners are trading down for more picks. Did not evaluate the actual trades in too much detail. My bad

Originally posted by adrianlesnar:
Why would the bears massively over pay to move up to 31? Who's their target? Why are we reaching on a RT? Why is Pitt allowing us to massively rip them off? Why are we trading up for a PK?

the END is here with Staley, and while he may be w/the team for another year, and the ROOKIE (Wilson) will be our future LT ..

HOW do u see the Pitt trade as a rip off? We're giving them 2 extra picks..

WHY trade for a PK ???

GO do some search on EBERLE.

Originally posted by 9moon:

Originally posted by Kalen49ers:

Originally posted by m_brockalexander:

Don't like any of the picks except Collin Johnson. Trade downs are reasonable but the picks are not.

Trade downs reasonable? The Chicago trade is very unrealistic. No way the Bears do that.

The Bears saw Jonathan Taylor sitting in the Green Room playing slot machines and decided to move up the 1st round since they didn't have any... and also think that this kid will help young Bisquit develop as a QB..

It still makes no sense on many levels.

- They spent a 3rd on Montgomery in 2019 and he had 900 yards as a rookie.

- They have no 1st round pick and no 3rd or 4th round picks. So trading those two second rounders means they come away with one player in the first four rounds...with a GM and HC who are on the hot seat.

- The value of those two seconds is far greater than 31. There is no precedent that shows this deal as fair.

- They need help on the OL, at TE and in the back seven on D. RB is literally not a priority at all. They need to improve the line to improve the run game.

If they make a move for a RB it would be with a late round pick or a value FA to be a C-O-P.

Originally posted by evil:

Originally posted by 9moon:

Originally posted by Kalen49ers:

Originally posted by m_brockalexander:
Don't like any of the picks except Collin Johnson. Trade downs are reasonable but the picks are not.

Trade downs reasonable? The Chicago trade is very unrealistic. No way the Bears do that.

The Bears saw Jonathan Taylor sitting in the Green Room playing slot machines and decided to move up the 1st round since they didn't have any... and also think that this kid will help young Bisquit develop as a QB..

It still makes no sense on many levels.

- They spent a 3rd on Montgomery in 2019 and he had 900 yards as a rookie.

- They have no 1st round pick and no 3rd or 4th round picks. So trading those two second rounders means they come away with one player in the first four rounds...with a GM and HC who are on the hot seat.

- The value of those two seconds is far greater than 31. There is no precedent that shows this deal as fair.

- They need help on the OL, at TE and in the back seven on D. RB is literally not a priority at all. They need to improve the line to improve the run game.

If they make a move for a RB it would be with a late round pick or a value FA to be a C-O-P.

if you like a player and he's available for the taking, then you should not mind giving up more (values of the draft picks) in order to land him.. TEs can be found anywhere and anytime... of all fans WE should know that... We've have Vernon and we've also had Kittles..

Montgomery was a good pick, but he's not THAT type of a back... believing that Chicago can or will find another RB in the late round is no sure thing..

Originally posted by 9moon:

Originally posted by evil:

Originally posted by 9moon:

Originally posted by Kalen49ers:

Originally posted by m_brockalexander:

Don't like any of the picks except Collin Johnson. Trade downs are reasonable but the picks are not.

Trade downs reasonable? The Chicago trade is very unrealistic. No way the Bears do that.

The Bears saw Jonathan Taylor sitting in the Green Room playing slot machines and decided to move up the 1st round since they didn't have any... and also think that this kid will help young Bisquit develop as a QB..

It still makes no sense on many levels.

- They spent a 3rd on Montgomery in 2019 and he had 900 yards as a rookie.

- They have no 1st round pick and no 3rd or 4th round picks. So trading those two second rounders means they come away with one player in the first four rounds...with a GM and HC who are on the hot seat.

- The value of those two seconds is far greater than 31. There is no precedent that shows this deal as fair.

- They need help on the OL, at TE and in the back seven on D. RB is literally not a priority at all. They need to improve the line to improve the run game.

If they make a move for a RB it would be with a late round pick or a value FA to be a C-O-P.

if you like a player and he's available for the taking, then you should not mind giving up more (values of the draft picks) in order to land him.. TEs can be found anywhere and anytime... of all fans WE should know that... We've have Vernon and we've also had Kittles..

Montgomery was a good pick, but he's not THAT type of a back... believing that Chicago can or will find another RB in the late round is no sure thing..

RB's being found in the mid to late rounds have a storied history. Why overpay for one when you have an OL that needs fixing? Pace and Nagy are on the hot seat, they won't go all in on a position that is not highly valued anymore. They are likely to trade back from one of those two second round picks to gain some 3rd and 4th round picks and fix what is broken with that team.

Especially given that guys like Henry, Gordon and Drake are set to hit the market. And that doesn't account for others who might be available for trade or end up being surprise cuts.

This trade is rooted in fantasy not reality.

Originally posted by evil:

Originally posted by 9moon:

Originally posted by evil:

Originally posted by 9moon:

Originally posted by Kalen49ers:

Originally posted by m_brockalexander:
Don't like any of the picks except Collin Johnson. Trade downs are reasonable but the picks are not.

Trade downs reasonable? The Chicago trade is very unrealistic. No way the Bears do that.

The Bears saw Jonathan Taylor sitting in the Green Room playing slot machines and decided to move up the 1st round since they didn't have any... and also think that this kid will help young Bisquit develop as a QB..

It still makes no sense on many levels.

- They spent a 3rd on Montgomery in 2019 and he had 900 yards as a rookie.

- They have no 1st round pick and no 3rd or 4th round picks. So trading those two second rounders means they come away with one player in the first four rounds...with a GM and HC who are on the hot seat.

- The value of those two seconds is far greater than 31. There is no precedent that shows this deal as fair.

- They need help on the OL, at TE and in the back seven on D. RB is literally not a priority at all. They need to improve the line to improve the run game.

If they make a move for a RB it would be with a late round pick or a value FA to be a C-O-P.

if you like a player and he's available for the taking, then you should not mind giving up more (values of the draft picks) in order to land him.. TEs can be found anywhere and anytime... of all fans WE should know that... We've have Vernon and we've also had Kittles..

Montgomery was a good pick, but he's not THAT type of a back... believing that Chicago can or will find another RB in the late round is no sure thing..

RB's being found in the mid to late rounds have a storied history. Why overpay for one when you have an OL that needs fixing? Pace and Nagy are on the hot seat, they won't go all in on a position that is not highly valued anymore. They are likely to trade back from one of those two second round picks to gain some 3rd and 4th round picks and fix what is broken with that team.

Especially given that guys like Henry, Gordon and Drake are set to hit the market. And that doesn't account for others who might be available for trade or end up being surprise cuts.

This trade is rooted in fantasy not reality.

... that's why it's called a MOCK..

you play the GM and share your thoughts..

but then again, ANYTHING can happen..

Originally posted by 9moon:

Originally posted by evil:

Originally posted by 9moon:

Originally posted by Kalen49ers:

Originally posted by m_brockalexander:
Don't like any of the picks except Collin Johnson. Trade downs are reasonable but the picks are not.

Trade downs reasonable? The Chicago trade is very unrealistic. No way the Bears do that.

The Bears saw Jonathan Taylor sitting in the Green Room playing slot machines and decided to move up the 1st round since they didn't have any... and also think that this kid will help young Bisquit develop as a QB..

It still makes no sense on many levels.

- They spent a 3rd on Montgomery in 2019 and he had 900 yards as a rookie.

- They have no 1st round pick and no 3rd or 4th round picks. So trading those two second rounders means they come away with one player in the first four rounds...with a GM and HC who are on the hot seat.

- The value of those two seconds is far greater than 31. There is no precedent that shows this deal as fair.

- They need help on the OL, at TE and in the back seven on D. RB is literally not a priority at all. They need to improve the line to improve the run game.

If they make a move for a RB it would be with a late round pick or a value FA to be a C-O-P.

if you like a player and he's available for the taking, then you should not mind giving up more (values of the draft picks) in order to land him.. TEs can be found anywhere and anytime... of all fans WE should know that... We've have Vernon and we've also had Kittles..

Montgomery was a good pick, but he's not THAT type of a back... believing that Chicago can or will find another RB in the late round is no sure thing..

He is a potential top 10 back they just absolutely refused to run that ball last year. It was insane.

Matt Nagy was the worst head coach in 2019 IMO. Horrendous playcalling.

I have no idea why you're defending the Bears taking a RB when they don't run the ball and have two really good RBs already drafted within the last few years.

Originally posted by 9moon:

Originally posted by evil:

Originally posted by 9moon:

Originally posted by evil:

Originally posted by 9moon:

Originally posted by Kalen49ers:

Originally posted by m_brockalexander:

Don't like any of the picks except Collin Johnson. Trade downs are reasonable but the picks are not.

Trade downs reasonable? The Chicago trade is very unrealistic. No way the Bears do that.

The Bears saw Jonathan Taylor sitting in the Green Room playing slot machines and decided to move up the 1st round since they didn't have any... and also think that this kid will help young Bisquit develop as a QB..

It still makes no sense on many levels.

- They spent a 3rd on Montgomery in 2019 and he had 900 yards as a rookie.

- They have no 1st round pick and no 3rd or 4th round picks. So trading those two second rounders means they come away with one player in the first four rounds...with a GM and HC who are on the hot seat.

- The value of those two seconds is far greater than 31. There is no precedent that shows this deal as fair.

- They need help on the OL, at TE and in the back seven on D. RB is literally not a priority at all. They need to improve the line to improve the run game.

If they make a move for a RB it would be with a late round pick or a value FA to be a C-O-P.

if you like a player and he's available for the taking, then you should not mind giving up more (values of the draft picks) in order to land him.. TEs can be found anywhere and anytime... of all fans WE should know that... We've have Vernon and we've also had Kittles..

Montgomery was a good pick, but he's not THAT type of a back... believing that Chicago can or will find another RB in the late round is no sure thing..

RB's being found in the mid to late rounds have a storied history. Why overpay for one when you have an OL that needs fixing? Pace and Nagy are on the hot seat, they won't go all in on a position that is not highly valued anymore. They are likely to trade back from one of those two second round picks to gain some 3rd and 4th round picks and fix what is broken with that team.

Especially given that guys like Henry, Gordon and Drake are set to hit the market. And that doesn't account for others who might be available for trade or end up being surprise cuts.

This trade is rooted in fantasy not reality.

... that's why it's called a MOCK..

you play the GM and share your thoughts..

but then again, ANYTHING can happen..

A better term is fantasy mock or fantasy offseason. Actual mocks should be rooted in some reality ie what you think is going to or could happen not what you wish would happen.

Man moon you do you....

I don't want to be a dick, but seriously these are the guys you're wanting to draft? And on top of it a kicker in the 4th?

Hey whatever it's your mock.