Would you trade our two 1st rounders for the #1 overall pick to draft Ndamukong Suh?
We wouldn't need to use our franchise tag on Aubrayo Franklyn and we'd have a stud DT, the kind we've been coveting for years! Also, I think this is a legitimate question because having two first round picks would definitely help the struggling Rams.
There are 217 users in the forums
Trade our two 1st's for Ndamukong?
Trade our two 1st's for Ndamukong?
Jan 5, 2010 at 5:53 PM
- doc_brown_
- Veteran
- Posts: 724
Jan 5, 2010 at 5:55 PM
- kronik
- Veteran
- Posts: 4,316
I don't think he's big enough to play as a nose tackle in a 3-4.
It'd be nice to have him but not at the cost of going thru next season with the same OL.
Anyways, there is a counter to Suh. His name is Iupati.
It'd be nice to have him but not at the cost of going thru next season with the same OL.
Anyways, there is a counter to Suh. His name is Iupati.
Jan 5, 2010 at 5:55 PM
- PA9erFaithful
- Veteran
- Posts: 12,452
Hell no.
Jan 5, 2010 at 5:56 PM
- kstolai
- Veteran
- Posts: 11,313
Originally posted by PA9erFaithful:
Hell no.
Jan 5, 2010 at 6:09 PM
- Negrodamus
- Veteran
- Posts: 13,782
o gawd. no not this again. every few days different member starts crap like this.
good luck.
good luck.
[ Edited by Negrodamus on Jan 5, 2010 at 6:11 PM ]
Jan 5, 2010 at 6:42 PM
- SonocoNinerFan
- Veteran
- Posts: 17,587
Even if we wanted Suh, #13 (1150) and #16/17 (1000 max) would only get us to # 3 or 4 . . . so we'd have to give up even more. And we shouldn't be too keen on arming the sorry a$$ Rams with a bunch of early draft picks. It's not an option.
Jan 5, 2010 at 6:59 PM
- SanDiego49er
- Veteran
- Posts: 50,142
Jan 5, 2010 at 7:54 PM
- FredFlintstone
- Veteran
- Posts: 46,093
FUUUUUUUUUU**********K NO!
Jan 5, 2010 at 7:59 PM
- Thorhawk
- Veteran
- Posts: 16,617
Jan 5, 2010 at 11:27 PM
- bigmike55
- Veteran
- Posts: 3,474
Why trade two middle of the first round picks, which could potentially become two starters next season.. for Ndamukong Suh, who is a great player in his own right when we don't even need a DT/NT. We will re-sign franklin and our front 3 are great at stopping the run already.
NOOOOO!!!!
NOOOOO!!!!
Jan 5, 2010 at 11:30 PM
- Kolohe
- Hall of Fame
- Posts: 62,415
Originally posted by kronik:
I don't think he's big enough to play as a nose tackle in a 3-4.
It'd be nice to have him but not at the cost of going thru next season with the same OL.
Anyways, there is a counter to Suh. His name is Iupati.
LOL at the Iupati hype around here.
Jan 5, 2010 at 11:36 PM
- Mister49
- Member
- Posts: 663
NO! 'nuff said!
Jan 5, 2010 at 11:38 PM
- GEEK
- Veteran
- Posts: 19,217
Originally posted by Kolohe:Originally posted by kronik:
I don't think he's big enough to play as a nose tackle in a 3-4.
It'd be nice to have him but not at the cost of going thru next season with the same OL.
Anyways, there is a counter to Suh. His name is Iupati.
LOL at the Iupati hype around here.
Don't you dare.
Jan 5, 2010 at 11:39 PM
- jojomellon
- Member
- Posts: 1,793
wouldnt fit anywhere in a 3-4.
Jan 5, 2010 at 11:49 PM
- Ether
- Veteran
- Posts: 1,515
Originally posted by GEEK:Originally posted by Kolohe:Originally posted by kronik:
I don't think he's big enough to play as a nose tackle in a 3-4.
It'd be nice to have him but not at the cost of going thru next season with the same OL.
Anyways, there is a counter to Suh. His name is Iupati.
LOL at the Iupati hype around here.
Don't you dare.
Who has Iupati even looked in the eyes, let alone block against, that is comparable to Ndamukong Suh?
[ Edited by Ether on Jan 5, 2010 at 11:50 PM ]