Originally posted by SonocoNinerFan:
I pray they take a QB . . . but they'll probably take Suh . . .
Ditto-sure don't want our already anemic O facing what seems to be a beast!
There are 244 users in the forums
Originally posted by SonocoNinerFan:
I pray they take a QB . . . but they'll probably take Suh . . .
Originally posted by SonocoNinerFan:
I pray they take a QB . . . but they'll probably take Suh . . .
Originally posted by MaliCali:Originally posted by SonocoNinerFan:
I pray they take a QB . . . but they'll probably take Suh . . .
ya, because he will be there at #4
Originally posted by krizay:Originally posted by MaliCali:Originally posted by SonocoNinerFan:
I pray they take a QB . . . but they'll probably take Suh . . .
ya, because he will be there at #4
Originally posted by krizay:Originally posted by ninertico:
I understand the importance of drafting a franchise QB, but not at the expense of the top DT to come out in a generation. Suh is tooooooooo good to pass up for Clausen or Bradford, IMO.
I believe the Rams will draft Suh. Heck, they may trade back to land a QB and some picks, but I don't know who would want to jump up to take Suh at #1. That is why I that Suh will be a Ram once the dust settles.
Clausen and Bradford are not clear cut #1s. Suh is, again IMHO.
It's easy to sit here and say that when your team is sitting where they are. If we had the #1 pick and we had to trot out a trio of a broke down Bulger, Kyle Boller & Some dude named Null you'd be saying take Claussen or Bradford.
To us sure Suh is the best player. In their situation. Not so much. Especially after drafting Long & Carriker in recent drafts.
They will go Claussen or Bradford.
Originally posted by AiNoKea:Originally posted by krizay:Originally posted by AiNoKea:
If the Rams don't take an OT with their 1st pick someone needs to be fired!!! Then again if I was the Rams I would trade outta the 1st overall pick and target Clausen AND one of the top OT's.
They just took Jason Smith number 2ish last year
And yet they continue to have OL issues!!
Originally posted by DaveWilcox:
The will draft Suh and McKoy at the top of the 2nd round.
Originally posted by strickac:at first you say, they should take suh...then you say sth like "they need another weapon beside jackson"...now what do you want them to draft???
Hopefully they take Suh. Bulger isn't the answer and Null is a big question mark. I'd much rather they had a stud DT than a franchise QB.
DTs don't win games for you. The Rams are a disaster on offense. If you shutdown Jackson, they can't win.
Originally posted by KRS-1:Originally posted by AiNoKea:Originally posted by krizay:Originally posted by AiNoKea:
If the Rams don't take an OT with their 1st pick someone needs to be fired!!! Then again if I was the Rams I would trade outta the 1st overall pick and target Clausen AND one of the top OT's.
They just took Jason Smith number 2ish last year
And yet they continue to have OL issues!!
Had you read my post you would have known he only played in 8 games this year (He missed a month as he could not gain medical clearance after sufering a concussion and he also missed a chunk of time after injuring his knee early in the year) and he was placed on the right side. The Rams intended to play him their for his rookie year with the intent to move him to the left once he improved in pass pro.
The Rams won't be taking an OT at #1. The cost to have bookends drafted 1 & 2 in consecutive years is too big a chunk of change for a team with as many holes as they have.
Originally posted by AiNoKea:Originally posted by KRS-1:Originally posted by AiNoKea:Originally posted by krizay:Originally posted by AiNoKea:
If the Rams don't take an OT with their 1st pick someone needs to be fired!!! Then again if I was the Rams I would trade outta the 1st overall pick and target Clausen AND one of the top OT's.
They just took Jason Smith number 2ish last year
And yet they continue to have OL issues!!
Had you read my post you would have known he only played in 8 games this year (He missed a month as he could not gain medical clearance after sufering a concussion and he also missed a chunk of time after injuring his knee early in the year) and he was placed on the right side. The Rams intended to play him their for his rookie year with the intent to move him to the left once he improved in pass pro.
The Rams won't be taking an OT at #1. The cost to have bookends drafted 1 & 2 in consecutive years is too big a chunk of change for a team with as many holes as they have.
You might be right, but I wouldn't be so sure they wouldn't. Besides, the #1 overall pick will cost a lot anyways, especially if they take a QB. Seeing that Stafford got about 80 million as a rookie, I would think the cost of a OT going overall would be much cheaper. I think free agency will determine who they will pick #1 overall, but I don't see any good QB's or OT's that would make up for not taking a QB or OT #1 overall. Another reason I think the rams will/should take a OT is because of their faith in Alex Barron which I don't see much in.
Originally posted by teeohh:
rams fans debate who to pick
they are split on Clausen on Suh
I read some of the threads and the Suh crowd tends to say they can get a QB in FA, while the Clausen crew tends to say that Clausen will get them more wins
Right now I say they should pick Clausen, but if they can get a starter in FA then obviously it will be Suh.