Originally posted by vrabbit:
check that, will not RUN at the combine
Hope it helps him fall to us.
There are 372 users in the forums
Originally posted by vrabbit:
check that, will not RUN at the combine
Originally posted by Kolohe:
Originally posted by WRATHman44:
Originally posted by Kolohe:
Welker and Eldeman are both very capable of stretching the field, we SHOULD both agree upon that without having to bring stats into this. Branch is also still dangerous enough that he takes pressure off the TE's and opens up the underneath routes, I just don't see how you could disagree. But with as deep as NE is at the TE position, not even they run two or three TE's constantly in between the 20's. NE's second TE doesn't even have 200 yards receiving with only 2 TD's, and as pass-happy NE what makes anyone think Fleener would have just as much or more with our balanced attack?? Now I could see if we were running a Coryell or smiliar to Norv Turner's offense, utilizing a lot of two-TE sets with heavy play-action down field passing, but we're not, which is even more of a reason NOT to draft another TE in the 1st round. NOW, if Fleener falls to us in the 2nd than by all means pull the damn trigger, but as it stands we're better off adding another DE/LB, CB, DE, OG or WR in the 1st round.
IF they are capable of stretching the field, they don't actually do it. They both do their damage with under neath routes: mostly slants, crosses, outs, shake-outs, shake-ins, and drags. The Superbowl was the first time I saw Welker run an even marginally-deep (MAYBE 20yds) route in a while, and Brady was so surprised that he missed him, no matter what his bag-of-bones wife has to say. Like I said, Branch runs good, crafty routes, but he's definitely not pulling safety help off of the TEs. ever. I think your statement about the #2 tight end has been covered adequately. I think you are trying so hard to make a point that you lost touch with the facts for a moment. The team and players you are describing do not match-up with what I see on the field. I could be crazy, but I don't think so (would I know if I WAS? )
I don't feel I lost touch of the point I'm trying to make just really forming an opinion on why I rather go in a different direction than Fleener in the 1st.
re: Bold - So I guess you watch more Patriots football than the 9ers I take it?? I mean you must have since you know every game that's all the routes they run.
Originally posted by tohara3:
Originally posted by vrabbit:
check that, will not RUN at the combine
Hope it helps him fall to us.
Originally posted by jimmy49erfan:
Yeah lets draft a big slow TE at 30 instead of a pass rusher Id rather wait and get another fast WR/TE in the 2nd or 3rd then waste a 1st rd pick on a slow TE. The last thing this offense needs is a big slow TE and the defense just needs another pass rusher at OLB/DE to be elite.
Originally posted by jimmy49erfan:
Yeah lets draft a big slow TE at 30 instead of a pass rusher Id rather wait and get another fast WR/TE in the 2nd or 3rd then waste a 1st rd pick on a slow TE. The last thing this offense needs is a big slow TE and the defense just needs another pass rusher at OLB/DE to be elite.
Originally posted by Phoenix49ers:
How do you know Fleener is slow. Truth be told he's probably not much slower than your man Jeffery, but a heck of a lot bigger and not fat.
Originally posted by 49ersalldaway126:
jeffery is bigger
fleener may have 2 inches on him but alshon will have the best verticle this draft class
Originally posted by Phoenix49ers:
How do you know Fleener is slow. Truth be told he's probably not much slower than your man Jeffery, but a heck of a lot bigger and not fat.
Originally posted by Kolohe:
Ahh this time of the year, everyone falls in love with a pick and defends him to the death, oh how I love draft time.
To the Coby Fleener fans I bow out of this one, don''t wanna be glued to one thread.
Originally posted by Kolohe:
Ahh this time of the year, everyone falls in love with a pick and defends him to the death, oh how I love draft time.
To the Coby Fleener fans I bow out of this one, don''t wanna be glued to one thread.
Originally posted by ImaMod:not to mention saints have a colston and patriots have a welker
Do we REALLY want to take a TE in the 1st round when we already have an elite TE and a good 2nd string TE
If theres either Ruben Randle or Coby Fleener there, do you guys really want to take the TE? Honestly I think Randle will be a beast and I dont see why we'd go with TE. I know all these huge great TEs like Jimmy Graham and the Gronk and Hernandez double threat in New England but we got VD and Delanie
Originally posted by 49ersalldaway126:
not to mention saints have a colston and patriots have a welker
we need a #1 WR before we get a #2 TE/#3 TE
Originally posted by Kolohe:
I don't feel I lost touch of the point I'm trying to make just really forming an opinion on why I rather go in a different direction than Fleener in the 1st.
re: Bold - So I guess you watch more Patriots football than the 9ers I take it?? I mean you must have since you know every game that's all the routes they run.