Originally posted by NYniner85:
yeah I see people trying to compare him to Ginn based on the fact that they went to Ohio St and are both fast, but that's about all that's similar.
Like you said Ginn was hesitant, isn't physical at all, can't track and adjust to the long ball, and avoids contact....Smith is the exact opposite.
http://www.rotoworld.com/player/cfb/131740/devin-smith
Ohio State WR Devin Smith "has a chance to run in the 4.2 range," writes ESPN's Todd McShay.
"He's a track guy, participating in the high jump and 4x100-meter relay for the Buckeyes, and his speed translates well to the football field," McShay wrote. "I think he was a bit overlooked in terms of how important he was to OSU's success this season, as he was the best downfield threat in college football." Smith has run a reported 4.33 forty. He was Ohio's high school long jumping champion and also ran a 10.56 100-meter dash. Smith is a potential Round 1 pick if he singes the track in Indy.
He will shoot up the boards if he runs a 4.3 or better, honestly I won't mind taking him at 15, but I don't see Baalke doing that.
He's not nearly complete enough as a receiver to take at 15, people fawning over him reminds me of the hype over Darius-Heyward-Bey in all honesty. People focus so much on the athleticism and not enough on the football skills.
The guy is limited as a route runner, mostly one-dimensional, similar to a Mike Wallace, there's nothing wrong with that but you don't take that guy with the 15th pick, you take a guy like Beckham who was eons more developed in terms of being a route runner that early. I've seen him compared to a shorter Martavis Bryant in terms of their overall game and I think that description is apt. He's there to go deep, but if that is the only qualification you're looking for from a WR, I think Dorsett in the 2nd or Lockett in the 3rd would be better value.
I think if you take a wide receiver early, you want the most complete player you can get. I don't think Smith really fits that description compared to guys like Cooper and Parker who are far more developed in terms of overall WR skills.
Smith's bread and butter was the fly pattern, he struggled, especially on shorter routes where he had most of his drops,until he improves more as an intermediate receiver, I can't see him being anything more than a role player and you don't really drop the 15th pick in the draft on a role player. His sophomore teammate Michael Thomas actually seems to be a more complete receiver overall, more versatile.
The 49ers need a guy like Devin Smith, a true deep threat that can make plays way downfield, I'm just not too excited about dropping a 1st rounder on him. There's the thought that he MIGHT improve as a route runner but the same things were said about Wallace and Cordarrelle Patterson as well, both were athletic freaks that were fairly one-dimensional and they've turned out to be fairly one-dimensional receivers in the NFL as well. Its not always a situation where you can coach a guy up.
Guys who already tend to be very good route runners in college, usually progress to that level in the NFL. Both Beckham and Landry were outstanding route runners at LSU, unsurprisingly they have been very good route runners in the NFL as well. The margin of error that you get in college due to superior athleticism tends to vanish quickly in the NFL, so you have to be every bit the technician to continue to be able to beat defensive backs that bigger and faster than many of the guys you were matched up against in college.
[ Edited by Phoenix49ers on Feb 18, 2015 at 8:48 AM ]