Originally posted by NinerSickness:
I'm not saying the guy's slow by any means; I'm just saying pro' day numbers are notoriously unrealistic, and this guy is not a 4.25 receiver. Not even close.
The dude has more flaws in his game than Cordarrelle Patterson did at Tennessee, and Patterson was a better athlete IMO. Probably just as fast, more flexible, better hands... and Patterson isn't even any good in the pro's.
This guy is not a top-20 talent like people are saying. I wouldn't touch him in the top 50 picks.
Cordarrelle Patterson is a world class athlete... huge guy with breakaway speed and is a RB with the ball in his hands. He's just a dumbass, but if he can get his head on right, he can be as good as any WR. I just don't think he knows what he's doing on the field, and he STILL makes monster plays.
Athletically, they are similar, Patterson has more wiggle, Perriman is a bit faster... both have a nice power element to their game, I'd probably give the edge to Patterson, as I've mentioned before he's a freaking RB with the rock in his hands.
As for ball skills, Perriman has the edge and it's not even close. He has some concentration drops, but Patterson can't adjust to bad passes, high point jump balls and catch in traffic like Perriman.
Patterson, first off, is entering his 3rd season, has flashed big time ability, is still developing... and pretty much all of his issues are from the neck up. He was also playing with terrible QB's his first 2 years, in terrible offenses. So I'm not really sure why you're trying to make it seem like his career is a failure.
You don't have to think Perriman is a Top 20 or 50 pick, I'm sure there might be some GM's that agree with you-- but all you're doing is making purely opinion based statements and stating them as they are facts.
"I don't think Perriman is as good as Patterson and Patterson hasn't proven he's an elite WR" isn't exactly a substantial critique.