There are 128 users in the forums

DeForest Buckner DL - Oregon

Im sold. I want this dooood
Originally posted by WRATHman44:
Originally posted by Zachary:
Who do y'all compare him to? I don't know much about him.

And how does he compare to Armstead?

Same playing strength, but he's more athletic, more instinctive, and a better pass rusher.

Yeah Buckner is more pro-ready for sure...AA IMO should have stayed another year and if I remember correctly his last year at OU was his first year focusing just on football (played Bball as well).

I remember this time last year watching highlights of AA and saw #44 all over the place, dude was beast....I thought there's no way we'd have a chance to draft him next year lol.
  • crew
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 804
Originally posted by WRATHman44:
I don't think he falls to us. I'm hoping for Goff, Buckner, or Jack. I think one of them will be available at 7, with Wentz, Tunsil, and Ramsey almost certainly gone and Stanley likely to go.

Agree, Buckner, Jack or Goff at #7. There are possibilities all 3 could be off the board by #7, but more than likely one of them will be there.
I see the top 4 picks going like this: Tunsil, Wentz, Ramsey, Bosa. Jags could take either Buckner or Jack, Ravens probably choose between Jack, Stanley & Hargraves.
Goff has the best chance of being at #7, unless Rams trade up to #6 to get him.
Originally posted by crew:
Originally posted by WRATHman44:
I don't think he falls to us. I'm hoping for Goff, Buckner, or Jack. I think one of them will be available at 7, with Wentz, Tunsil, and Ramsey almost certainly gone and Stanley likely to go.

Agree, Buckner, Jack or Goff at #7. There are possibilities all 3 could be off the board by #7, but more than likely one of them will be there.
I see the top 4 picks going like this: Tunsil, Wentz, Ramsey, Bosa. Jags could take either Buckner or Jack, Ravens probably choose between Jack, Stanley & Hargraves.
Goff has the best chance of being at #7, unless Rams trade up to #6 to get him.

Best thing we could do is sign Osmele so they have to draft Stanley then we take Buckner (if Goff is gone)
Originally posted by NYniner85:
Originally posted by crew:
Originally posted by WRATHman44:
I don't think he falls to us. I'm hoping for Goff, Buckner, or Jack. I think one of them will be available at 7, with Wentz, Tunsil, and Ramsey almost certainly gone and Stanley likely to go.

Agree, Buckner, Jack or Goff at #7. There are possibilities all 3 could be off the board by #7, but more than likely one of them will be there.
I see the top 4 picks going like this: Tunsil, Wentz, Ramsey, Bosa. Jags could take either Buckner or Jack, Ravens probably choose between Jack, Stanley & Hargraves.
Goff has the best chance of being at #7, unless Rams trade up to #6 to get him.

Best thing we could do is sign Osmele so they have to draft Stanley then we take Buckner (if Goff is gone)

Lol, I'm on board with this. Still think they'd take Buckner rather than reaching for need, but I want Osemele anyways
Originally posted by eastcoast49ersfan:
Lol, I'm on board with this. Still think they'd take Buckner rather than reaching for need, but I want Osemele anyways

I wouldn't say Stanley is a reach espeically if they need a LT
Originally posted by NYniner85:
Originally posted by eastcoast49ersfan:
Lol, I'm on board with this. Still think they'd take Buckner rather than reaching for need, but I want Osemele anyways

I wouldn't say Stanley is a reach espeically if they need a LT

Yeah, I'd imagine Stanley is in the top 10 of most team big boards.
  • crew
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 804
Originally posted by WRATHman44:
Originally posted by NYniner85:
Originally posted by eastcoast49ersfan:
Lol, I'm on board with this. Still think they'd take Buckner rather than reaching for need, but I want Osemele anyways

I wouldn't say Stanley is a reach espeically if they need a LT

Yeah, I'd imagine Stanley is in the top 10 of most team big boards.

All 4 CBS NFL sports guys (Rang, Prisco, Brugler and Brinson) in their most recent mocks have the Ravens taking Stanley at #6.
Originally posted by crew:
Originally posted by WRATHman44:
Originally posted by NYniner85:
Originally posted by eastcoast49ersfan:
Lol, I'm on board with this. Still think they'd take Buckner rather than reaching for need, but I want Osemele anyways

I wouldn't say Stanley is a reach espeically if they need a LT

Yeah, I'd imagine Stanley is in the top 10 of most team big boards.

All 4 CBS NFL sports guys (Rang, Prisco, Brugler and Brinson) in their most recent mocks have the Ravens taking Stanley at #6.

2 of the NFL.com guys (Jeremiah, Davis) have Stanley at #11 (the other 2 have him at #6). Buckner would be the BPA there in my opinion so I think he'd be the pick even if they lost Osemele. Stanley is probably a top 10 player on most boards (I think he's one of the 10 best players), but I have Buckner as a top 5 player which is why I think passing on him would be reaching for need.
Would you guys draft this guy (Buckner) if he comes out of the closet??
Originally posted by 9moon:
Would you guys draft this guy (Buckner) if he comes out of the closet??


What difference does that make
Originally posted by KajunNiner:
What difference does that make

This. What the hell? I care about what they do out on the football field not who they do or dont sleep with.


What is wrong with you 9moon? Seriously?
Originally posted by 9moon:
Would you guys draft this guy (Buckner) if he comes out of the closet??

Just tryin to find out who's being honest here.. and who looks at his talent..

I personally, just does not see him as a top 10 player..
Originally posted by 9moon:
Would you guys draft this guy (Buckner) if he comes out of the closet??

He won't make it to Atlanta's pick.
Search Share 49ersWebzone