There are 332 users in the forums
Originally posted by Jcool:
Originally posted by Phoenix49ers:
Kind of like the comments about his questionable athleticism persist even though he outdid almost every single tackle in the draft at the Combine. I think he's been pigeon-holed as a RT tackle in the NFL so a lot of people overlook him.
He did?
Originally posted by NYniner85:not really I mean they break it down to OL (not just OTs) on NFL.com and they only one he place top 10 in was 40 yard dash. I like him but not at 7.
Sources Tell Us "That is a dude, right there. He was busting up Ohio State in the fourth quarter of that game not because he was more talented than those guys but because he just wanted it more. He's tougher than old beef jerky. He fits in our division." -- NFC North scout
NFL Comparison Jon Runyan
Bottom Line Possesses top flight size and strength at the tackle position and has the technique and recovery athleticism to make up for his average foot quickness. Conklin went from solid in 2014 to very good in 2015 and teams must now decide whether or not they want to give him a chance at left tackle or plug him in on the right side where he should be able to step in right away and become a quality starter. Conklin has some physical limitations, but he's got solid technique and exactly the field demeanor that offensive line coaches will be looking for.
Originally posted by Phoenix49ers:
Originally posted by NYniner85:
not really I mean they break it down to OL (not just OTs) on NFL.com and they only one he place top 10 in was 40 yard dash. I like him but not at 7.
Compare him with the other top tackles. For a guy who supposedly isnt very athletic he did better than both Stanley and Decker and many other tackles.
Pete Prisco Verified account @PriscoCBS DeForest Buckner not getting close to the hype he should be getting. Guy is a beast.
Originally posted by Phoenix49ers:
Pete Prisco Verified account @PriscoCBS DeForest Buckner not getting close to the hype he should be getting. Guy is a beast.
Originally posted by YungAce:
Amstead and Buckner please
Originally posted by Joecool:
AA and Buckner as our two DE's would be freaking crazy. I still think we should go OL but only if we grade one as high as 7. Have a feeling some of the defensive guys grade higher than the 3rd OL which means we take a defensive guy or trade down.
Originally posted by 21SandersMoss84:I think Baalke can find Chip's prototype guards in the mid rounds. Buck at #7 would be a safe pick, IMO. Ronnie Stanley's stock is rising and may murk things up at #7.
Originally posted by NYniner85:
Originally posted by 21SandersMoss84:
I think Baalke can find Chip's prototype guards in the mid rounds. Buck at #7 would be a safe pick, IMO. Ronnie Stanley's stock is rising and may murk things up at #7.
Buckner at 7 Joshua Garnett at 37 build those lines!
Originally posted by Jcool:Originally posted by Since07:I would be happy to have Buckner but I do feel that he's being a bit over hyped because of his size/Arms/Hands alone.
Would Rather have Bosa fills a greater need at a position that is weak in this yrs draft unlike DL
You do know Bosa is a DL and a 4-3 DL at that.
