Originally posted by Crown:Begs the question what QB is Lynch after in this draft?
Probably none. Just cousins I'd guess.
There are 411 users in the forums
Patrick Mahomes QB
Apr 27, 2017 at 6:55 PM
- GhostOfBaalke
- Veteran
- Posts: 6,105
Probably none. Just cousins I'd guess.
Apr 27, 2017 at 6:59 PM
- 49AllTheTime
- Veteran
- Posts: 68,679
Originally posted by Crown:Peterman
Originally posted by GhostOfBaalke:
Originally posted by 808niner4lyphe:
One of those moments where you felt like your evaluation was better than the draft gurus who do it for a living
Exactly how I feel. Most had him a second rounder but it seemed so clear that he was top level talent. Andy Reid know Wsup
Begs the question what QB is Lynch after in this draft?
Apr 27, 2017 at 7:05 PM
- strickac
- Veteran
- Posts: 15,175
Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:Peterman
That would be my guess too. I think #34 is a little too rich though. I wouldn't rule him out if he slips to the 3rd.
Itll be interesting to see what happens with Kizer if he makes it to the 2nd round. Not sure he makes it past #33 or #34.
Apr 27, 2017 at 7:06 PM
- Crown
- Hall of Fame
- Posts: 35,103
Originally posted by strickac:
Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:
Peterman
That would be my guess too. I think #34 is a little too rich though. I wouldn't rule him out if he slips to the 3rd.
Itll be interesting to see what happens with Kizer if he makes it to the 2nd round. Not sure he makes it past #33 or #34.
agree with you guys.
Ghost said KC but i have a weird feeling that ship has sailed forever.
Apr 27, 2017 at 7:08 PM
- SofaKing
- Veteran
- Posts: 27,442
Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:
Originally posted by Crown:Peterman
Originally posted by GhostOfBaalke:
Originally posted by 808niner4lyphe:
One of those moments where you felt like your evaluation was better than the draft gurus who do it for a living
Exactly how I feel. Most had him a second rounder but it seemed so clear that he was top level talent. Andy Reid know Wsup
Begs the question what QB is Lynch after in this draft?
This. Firmly on the Peterman bandwagon now. Hopefully we can wait until the 3rd to get him.
Apr 27, 2017 at 7:10 PM
- danarez49
- Veteran
- Posts: 529
Mahomes= kaepernick no thanks
Apr 27, 2017 at 7:11 PM
- GhostOfBaalke
- Veteran
- Posts: 6,105
Man we have so many picks now. I'd love to take Peterman in the third . We have 66 and 67. So it's perfect. Maybe trade up with a 5th or 6th or something into the second.
Apr 27, 2017 at 9:35 PM
- tatdwolf49
- Veteran
- Posts: 3,206
Dude sounds like a deeper voice of Kermit the Frog 
Apr 27, 2017 at 9:56 PM
- BuZzB05
- Veteran
- Posts: 3,608
- NFL Pick 'em
I am happy that I did suggest to my friend for Mahome by Chiefs. I am surprised it. 
. I just would like to help my friend about draft. 
. I just would like to help my friend about draft.
[ Edited by BuZzB05 on Apr 27, 2017 at 9:57 PM ]
Apr 27, 2017 at 10:00 PM
- gold49digger
- Veteran
- Posts: 17,539
still salty about mahomes, even if i think we couldn't have done any better with our moves. Mahomes stock grew as a result of a weak qb class. way too raw, but i am glad he isn't in our divison!
Apr 27, 2017 at 10:02 PM
- BuZzB05
- Veteran
- Posts: 3,608
- NFL Pick 'em
Originally posted by gold49digger:still salty about mahomes, even if i think we couldn't have done any better with our moves. Mahomes stock grew as a result of a weak qb class. way too raw, but i am glad he isn't in our divison!
I agreed with you the Bold that.
Apr 28, 2017 at 7:04 AM
- WRATHman44
- Staff
- Posts: 16,899
Originally posted by gold49digger:
still salty about mahomes, even if i think we couldn't have done any better with our moves. Mahomes stock grew as a result of a weak qb class. way too raw, but i am glad he isn't in our divison!
Yup. SF, KC, and AZ were his best fits. AZ was the scariest option by far. Arians coaching Mahomes, throwing to Brown? Bombs away, all day. Would have been awful.
Apr 28, 2017 at 7:42 AM
- SunDevilNiner79
- Hall of Fame
- Posts: 57,363
lol at all the haters saying he wasn't going in the first
Aug 7, 2017 at 4:02 PM
- Jcool
- Veteran
- Posts: 43,843
- NFL Pick 'em
Will be interesting to see if this holds
Who says the past isn't predictive?
— Michael Salfino (@MichaelSalfino) August 6, 2017
This chart is stunning. @WSJSportshttps://t.co/JXGr9Cm4Yr pic.twitter.com/VlCalwSfmL
Aug 7, 2017 at 4:49 PM
- SunDevilNiner79
- Hall of Fame
- Posts: 57,363
Originally posted by Jcool:
Will be interesting to see if this holds
Who says the past isn't predictive?
— Michael Salfino (@MichaelSalfino) August 6, 2017
This chart is stunning. @WSJSportshttps://t.co/JXGr9Cm4Yr pic.twitter.com/VlCalwSfmL
I think its a relatively useless chart. I hate statistical analysis that fails to understand control factors and use of comparison. For example, to try to create a theory that college-win rate influences NFL win-rate, you'd have to expand it past the 1st round and include QBs that had a winning college record.
Ken Dorsey won a ton of college games, and was worthless in the NFL.
Looking at 2010-2012 1st round QBs with winning college records:
Sam Bradford - stunk in NFL so far
Tebow - didn't last in NFL
Newton -
Gabbert - sucks in NFL
Ponder - is he still in the league?
Luck -
RG3 - hasn't worked in nfl
Tannehill - still hasn't made it
Weeden - sucks in nfl
So I mean no matter how you break down QBs based on one stat/attribute, guess what, you are going to see they probably flop in the NFL because......Most QBs drafted don't end up as great players.