Harold Landry Boston College DE/OLB

Originally posted by NCommand:
Good for him.

9 sacks for Harold Landry this year...been a fun watch on tape too. Lot of teams dropped the ball letting him fall

— Jon Ledyard (@LedyardNFLDraft) December 2, 2019

Originally posted by NCommand:

Good for him.

9 sacks for Harold Landry this year...been a fun watch on tape too. Lot of teams dropped the ball letting him fall

— Jon Ledyard (@LedyardNFLDraft) December 2, 2019

"But but Pettis was the best rookie WR in 2018"

Originally posted by WRATHman44:

but he was picked way before pettis was. The only way the 49ers could have drafted him is if they didn't pick MCG or didn't trade for Jimmy G.

Originally posted by pdizo916:

Originally posted by WRATHman44:

but he was picked way before pettis was. The only way the 49ers could have drafted him is if they didn't pick MCG or didn't trade for Jimmy G.

That's incorrect nothing to do with Getting either of those guys.
The capitol we used to trade up for Pettis was more then what was used to get Landry.

Originally posted by Oilcan:

Originally posted by pdizo916:

Originally posted by WRATHman44:

but he was picked way before pettis was. The only way the 49ers could have drafted him is if they didn't pick MCG or didn't trade for Jimmy G.

That's incorrect nothing to do with Getting either of those guys.
The capitol we used to trade up for Pettis was more then what was used to get Landry.

Terrible post. Also, it's spelled "capital".

In regards to your post, Landry was taken 2 spots ahead of Pettis. This means the Niners would have to give up MORE draft capital to move higher up the board

Also, you're assuming that Tennessee was even remotely interested in trading with us.

Originally posted by Scottie15:

Originally posted by Oilcan:

Originally posted by pdizo916:

Originally posted by WRATHman44:

but he was picked way before pettis was. The only way the 49ers could have drafted him is if they didn't pick MCG or didn't trade for Jimmy G.

That's incorrect nothing to do with Getting either of those guys.
The capitol we used to trade up for Pettis was more then what was used to get Landry.

Terrible post. Also, it's spelled "capital".

In regards to your post, Landry was taken 2 spots ahead of Pettis. This means the Niners would have to give up MORE draft capital to move higher up the board

Also, you're assuming that Tennessee was even remotely interested in trading with us.

I've seen enough of your posts to know that you shouldn't be calling anyone's terrible.

Now the facts, that was not Tennessee's original pick to trade. They traded up to the Raiders #41 pick using there #57 & #89 draft value chart says 475 points
Which is between pick #42-43.
We traded up to Washington's #44 also getting #142 using our #59 & #74 net value is 495 points which the value is between #40-41.
So we gave up more value then Tennessee did to pick 3 spots behind.

Now the Raiders just may not have wanted to deal with us. I suspect Shanny just wasn't interested in Landry and had his sights set on Pettis and as he has shown to do over paid for him.

Oh man wish he could've had him now. The first two drafts seem to be a learning lesson for Kyle not to reach for players who have no drive; Pettis, Joe Williams etc.

This '19 rookie class is all about drive it seems so at least they've learned their lessons finally.

f**k

Glad to see Landry playing well and like I thought he would but I'm ok with how things ended up for us. Who knows if we're picking #2 overall to get Bosa if we do move up for him.

Hopefully Pettis still finds his mojo and we get a talented WR who produces out of that pick.

Originally posted by Oilcan:

Originally posted by Scottie15:

Originally posted by Oilcan:

Originally posted by pdizo916:

Originally posted by WRATHman44:

but he was picked way before pettis was. The only way the 49ers could have drafted him is if they didn't pick MCG or didn't trade for Jimmy G.

That's incorrect nothing to do with Getting either of those guys.
The capitol we used to trade up for Pettis was more then what was used to get Landry.

Terrible post. Also, it's spelled "capital".

In regards to your post, Landry was taken 2 spots ahead of Pettis. This means the Niners would have to give up MORE draft capital to move higher up the board

Also, you're assuming that Tennessee was even remotely interested in trading with us.

I've seen enough of your posts to know that you shouldn't be calling anyone's terrible.

Now the facts, that was not Tennessee's original pick to trade. They traded up to the Raiders #41 pick using there #57 & #89 draft value chart says 475 points
Which is between pick #42-43.
We traded up to Washington's #44 also getting #142 using our #59 & #74 net value is 495 points which the value is between #40-41.
So we gave up more value then Tennessee did to pick 3 spots behind.

Now the Raiders just may not have wanted to deal with us. I suspect Shanny just wasn't interested in Landry and had his sights set on Pettis and as he has shown to do over paid for him.

All of this. Just posting with authority when they haven't done the 5 minutes of reading it takes to actually know what they are talking about. If the 49ers offered the exact same trade they gave to go get Pettis, they would have been able to get Landry. It's plain as day in trade value.

Everyone sad we missed out on Landry need to understand that if we drafted him we probably win another game or 2, thus killing our chances of selecting Bosa this season. Look how many close games we lost last season and we had zero edge rush.

Originally posted by Nastastical:
Everyone sad we missed out on Landry need to understand that if we drafted him we probably win another game or 2, thus killing our chances of selecting Bosa this season. Look how many close games we lost last season and we had zero edge rush.

I'm not sure about that. He wasn't great his rookie year. It's certainly possible, though.

I think it took Landry time to adjust to being used like a true 3-4 OLB in Vrabel's defense. Vrabel's fronts are so dynamic, and he asks a lot of his edge/force players.

But we all knew he would eventually start racking up the sacks. It was inevitable. That bend off(my new word) is ELITE!!

Originally posted by Oilcan:

Originally posted by Scottie15:

Originally posted by Oilcan:

Originally posted by pdizo916:

Originally posted by WRATHman44:

but he was picked way before pettis was. The only way the 49ers could have drafted him is if they didn't pick MCG or didn't trade for Jimmy G.

That's incorrect nothing to do with Getting either of those guys.
The capitol we used to trade up for Pettis was more then what was used to get Landry.

Terrible post. Also, it's spelled "capital".

In regards to your post, Landry was taken 2 spots ahead of Pettis. This means the Niners would have to give up MORE draft capital to move higher up the board

Also, you're assuming that Tennessee was even remotely interested in trading with us.

I've seen enough of your posts to know that you shouldn't be calling anyone's terrible.

Now the facts, that was not Tennessee's original pick to trade. They traded up to the Raiders #41 pick using there #57 & #89 draft value chart says 475 points
Which is between pick #42-43.
We traded up to Washington's #44 also getting #142 using our #59 & #74 net value is 495 points which the value is between #40-41.
So we gave up more value then Tennessee did to pick 3 spots behind.

Now the Raiders just may not have wanted to deal with us. I suspect Shanny just wasn't interested in Landry and had his sights set on Pettis and as he has shown to do over paid for him.

Actually, thank you for this post. Good insight into what you originally meant. I also agree on the bolded statement 100%

Originally posted by Oilcan:
I've seen enough of your posts to know that you shouldn't be calling anyone's terrible.

Now the facts, that was not Tennessee's original pick to trade. They traded up to the Raiders #41 pick using there #57 & #89 draft value chart says 475 points
Which is between pick #42-43.
We traded up to Washington's #44 also getting #142 using our #59 & #74 net value is 495 points which the value is between #40-41.
So we gave up more value then Tennessee did to pick 3 spots behind.

Now the Raiders just may not have wanted to deal with us. I suspect Shanny just wasn't interested in Landry and had his sights set on Pettis and as he has shown to do over paid for him.

I was just gonna post this...SF gave up more to move up to get Pettis.