There are 266 users in the forums

Roquan Smith, LB, Georgia

Originally posted by illinois9er:
Kiper on ESPN radio right now is saying the Colts are eyeing Roquan at #6

f**kers
Originally posted by illinois9er:
Kiper on ESPN radio right now is saying the Colts are eyeing Roquan at #6

Nice. It's much much easier to find a coverage LB in today's game. Far far harder to find an ER or stellar interior OL players.

The college game is loaded with these hybrid LB/SS's used to defending spread offenses. That's great for us in a deep draft.

Plus this potentially pushes QB down to us which also gives us trade-back options.

Losing out on Roquan Smith would not be the end of the world.
Originally posted by NCommand:
Originally posted by illinois9er:
Kiper on ESPN radio right now is saying the Colts are eyeing Roquan at #6

Nice. It's much much easier to find a coverage LB in today's game. Far far harder to find an ER or stellar interior OL players.

The college game is loaded with these hybrid LB/SS's used to defending spread offenses. That's great for us in a deep draft.

Plus this potentially pushes QB down to us which also gives us trade-back options.

Losing out on Roquan Smith would not be the end of the world.

Totally agree, as much as I'd like to have Roquan I'd be just as happy with Landry, Barkley or Nelson. I think I'd rather go Landry then nab a LB in the 2nd or move up for Evans.
Originally posted by illinois9er:
Originally posted by NCommand:
Originally posted by illinois9er:
Kiper on ESPN radio right now is saying the Colts are eyeing Roquan at #6

Nice. It's much much easier to find a coverage LB in today's game. Far far harder to find an ER or stellar interior OL players.

The college game is loaded with these hybrid LB/SS's used to defending spread offenses. That's great for us in a deep draft.

Plus this potentially pushes QB down to us which also gives us trade-back options.

Losing out on Roquan Smith would not be the end of the world.

Totally agree, as much as I'd like to have Roquan I'd be just as happy with Landry, Barkley or Nelson. I think I'd rather go Landry then nab a LB in the 2nd or move up for Evans.

Totally!
Originally posted by illinois9er:
Originally posted by NCommand:
Originally posted by illinois9er:
Kiper on ESPN radio right now is saying the Colts are eyeing Roquan at #6

Nice. It's much much easier to find a coverage LB in today's game. Far far harder to find an ER or stellar interior OL players.

The college game is loaded with these hybrid LB/SS's used to defending spread offenses. That's great for us in a deep draft.

Plus this potentially pushes QB down to us which also gives us trade-back options.

Losing out on Roquan Smith would not be the end of the world.

Totally agree, as much as I'd like to have Roquan I'd be just as happy with Landry, Barkley or Nelson. I think I'd rather go Landry then nab a LB in the 2nd or move up for Evans.

Assuming the draft goes as planned and no one unexpectedly falls to us I think that would be the best way to improve the defense.
  • mayo49
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 64,320
Hopefully, Nelson falls to us if the Colts go Smith.
If Evans is really falling to the 40s then I prefer Landry and trade up for Evans. Problem is there is no way of knowing in advance if Evans will fall within range for us to trade up for him, and Roquan would be sitting there at 9 and guaranteed to get him.

Ok the Landry page is catching up with this one at 190 pages now. This one at 195. If the Landry page by Thursday night is ahead them we go Landry.

But I still think Roquan is the better player by far and prefer that he is the pick based on his talent alone and BPA.
  • mayo49
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 64,320
Originally posted by Ezekiel38:
If Evans is really falling to the 40s then I prefer Landry and trade up for Evans. Problem is there is no way of knowing in advance if Evans will fall within range for us to trade up for him, and Roquan would be sitting there at 9 and guaranteed to get him.

Ok the Landry page is catching up with this one at 190 pages now. This one at 195. If the Landry page by Thursday night is ahead them we go Landry.

But I still think Roquan is the better player by far and prefer that he is the pick based on his talent alone and BPA.

It's really a tough decision to make. I'll be content with Nelson, Smith, Landry or Fitzpatrick.
  • crew
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 804
Originally posted by mayo49:
Hopefully, Nelson falls to us if the Colts go Smith.

I had this feeling for the past few days that the Colts are going to take Roquan at #6. If that happens, want a trade down with NE fo their 2 1st RD picks (plus maybe a 4th or 5th).
Originally posted by NCommand:
Originally posted by illinois9er:
Kiper on ESPN radio right now is saying the Colts are eyeing Roquan at #6

Nice. It's much much easier to find a coverage LB in today's game. Far far harder to find an ER or stellar interior OL players.

The college game is loaded with these hybrid LB/SS's used to defending spread offenses. That's great for us in a deep draft.

Plus this potentially pushes QB down to us which also gives us trade-back options.

Losing out on Roquan Smith would not be the end of the world.

Trade Bait IMO.

IMO they have been all in on Edmunds for awhile. They want the 49ers to come up to 6. and then still have a shot at Edmunds at #9 IMO.

Hope the 49ers dont bite.
  • Shifty
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 23,428
Originally posted by IdahoNiner:
Originally posted by NCommand:
Originally posted by illinois9er:
Kiper on ESPN radio right now is saying the Colts are eyeing Roquan at #6

Nice. It's much much easier to find a coverage LB in today's game. Far far harder to find an ER or stellar interior OL players.

The college game is loaded with these hybrid LB/SS's used to defending spread offenses. That's great for us in a deep draft.

Plus this potentially pushes QB down to us which also gives us trade-back options.

Losing out on Roquan Smith would not be the end of the world.

Trade Bait IMO.

IMO they have been all in on Edmunds for awhile. They want the 49ers to come up to 6. and then still have a shot at Edmunds at #9 IMO.

Hope the 49ers dont bite.

That would be quite the move from Indy if they pulled that off.
Originally posted by Kalen49ers:
Originally posted by IdahoNiner:
Originally posted by NCommand:
Originally posted by illinois9er:
Kiper on ESPN radio right now is saying the Colts are eyeing Roquan at #6

Nice. It's much much easier to find a coverage LB in today's game. Far far harder to find an ER or stellar interior OL players.

The college game is loaded with these hybrid LB/SS's used to defending spread offenses. That's great for us in a deep draft.

Plus this potentially pushes QB down to us which also gives us trade-back options.

Losing out on Roquan Smith would not be the end of the world.

Trade Bait IMO.

IMO they have been all in on Edmunds for awhile. They want the 49ers to come up to 6. and then still have a shot at Edmunds at #9 IMO.

Hope the 49ers dont bite.

That would be quite the move from Indy if they pulled that off.

Smokescreen imo as well. Roquan to colts with their needs sounds borderline idiotic unless Ballard is so scared he's trying to get more picks and take a squeaky safe prospect like Smith.
Originally posted by Hoovtrain:
Originally posted by illinois9er:
Kiper on ESPN radio right now is saying the Colts are eyeing Roquan at #6

f**kers

Man that sucks ! I think that there is a real chance that the fan favorite roquan smith won't be there at our pick 9 . There is buzz that the colts and bears love roquan . There is buzz that the niners love roquan and edmunds . I think some fans might be upset if we draft edmunds but I would be ok with either one or even Landry but I don't want us to draft a safety .
Originally posted by SmokeCrabtrees:
Smokescreen imo as well. Roquan to colts with their needs sounds borderline idiotic unless Ballard is so scared he's trying to get more picks and take a squeaky safe prospect like Smith.


Have you seen what their LB depth chart looks like?
Originally posted by Phoenix49ers:
Originally posted by SmokeCrabtrees:
Smokescreen imo as well. Roquan to colts with their needs sounds borderline idiotic unless Ballard is so scared he's trying to get more picks and take a squeaky safe prospect like Smith.


Have you seen what their LB depth chart looks like?

Lol. No and I'm sure it sucks. But I think if chubb or Nelson is there you just got to pull the trigger. I think your boy Minkah or even Ward make more sense than Smith. Just my opinion of course.
Share 49ersWebzone