LISTEN: What's Up With The 49ers DC Search? →

There are 331 users in the forums

Joshua Jackson CB/Iowa

Apr 29, 2020 at 4:15 PM
Originally posted by Kolohe:
Originally posted by Waterbear:
Originally posted by Phoenix49ers:
Originally posted by 49ers808:
Supposedly NY saw something on Twitter that we may trade Pettis to GB for him

If he's wrong, I ban him!


Please tell me its not the same guys who had that bogus NFL insider site too??? I think their names were something like 411 or whatever.

This account is much older FWIW
Apr 30, 2020 at 8:52 PM
Would be a nice trade, I loved Jackson coming out of college, think he still has the potential to be a good starter, especially in this defense
May 1, 2020 at 8:04 PM
Pettis for Jackson straight up would be as fair as player for player trade could be, as GB needs another WR and we need another CB

and we took Pettis 44, and they took Jackson right after in the 2018 draft
May 19, 2020 at 12:11 AM
Originally posted by DoseOfBosa:
Pettis for Jackson straight up would be as fair as player for player trade could be, as GB needs another WR and we need another CB

and we took Pettis 44, and they took Jackson right after in the 2018 draft

Pull da damn trigger on this already Lynch !!!!!
May 19, 2020 at 12:20 PM
  • Geeked
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 10,057
Originally posted by toppdogg32:
Originally posted by DoseOfBosa:
Pettis for Jackson straight up would be as fair as player for player trade could be, as GB needs another WR and we need another CB

and we took Pettis 44, and they took Jackson right after in the 2018 draft

Pull da damn trigger on this already Lynch !!!!!


I have a feeling the first couple of preseason games will dictate whether or not there's a trade. No one is dying for either position and there's a good chance that neither player would be starting for either team regardless of which team they're on.
May 21, 2020 at 7:27 AM
Originally posted by toppdogg32:
Originally posted by DoseOfBosa:
Pettis for Jackson straight up would be as fair as player for player trade could be, as GB needs another WR and we need another CB

and we took Pettis 44, and they took Jackson right after in the 2018 draft

Pull da damn trigger on this already Lynch !!!!!

Green Bay might be saying no.
May 21, 2020 at 7:38 AM
Originally posted by btthepunk:
Originally posted by toppdogg32:
Originally posted by DoseOfBosa:
Pettis for Jackson straight up would be as fair as player for player trade could be, as GB needs another WR and we need another CB

and we took Pettis 44, and they took Jackson right after in the 2018 draft

Pull da damn trigger on this already Lynch !!!!!

Green Bay might be saying no.

It would be a mistake. Pettis would easily be their second best WR.
May 21, 2020 at 11:36 AM
  • Furlow
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 22,520
Originally posted by Waterbear:
Originally posted by btthepunk:
Originally posted by toppdogg32:
Originally posted by DoseOfBosa:
Pettis for Jackson straight up would be as fair as player for player trade could be, as GB needs another WR and we need another CB

and we took Pettis 44, and they took Jackson right after in the 2018 draft

Pull da damn trigger on this already Lynch !!!!!

Green Bay might be saying no.

It would be a mistake. Pettis would easily be their second best WR.

Why does the outcome for them matter to us? We'd be better off with this trade. If they are more better off than we are, that shouldn't stop us.
May 21, 2020 at 1:53 PM
Originally posted by Furlow:
Originally posted by Waterbear:
Originally posted by btthepunk:
Originally posted by toppdogg32:
Originally posted by DoseOfBosa:
Pettis for Jackson straight up would be as fair as player for player trade could be, as GB needs another WR and we need another CB

and we took Pettis 44, and they took Jackson right after in the 2018 draft

Pull da damn trigger on this already Lynch !!!!!

Green Bay might be saying no.

It would be a mistake. Pettis would easily be their second best WR.

Why does the outcome for them matter to us? We'd be better off with this trade. If they are more better off than we are, that shouldn't stop us.

It doesn't... I'm saying the exact opposite of what you think I said. I want Pettis to succeed and I agree with you that we should make the trade.

After all... Green Bay is the last team I'm worried about.
May 21, 2020 at 1:59 PM
  • Furlow
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 22,520
Originally posted by Waterbear:
Originally posted by Furlow:
Originally posted by Waterbear:
Originally posted by btthepunk:
Originally posted by toppdogg32:
Originally posted by DoseOfBosa:
Pettis for Jackson straight up would be as fair as player for player trade could be, as GB needs another WR and we need another CB

and we took Pettis 44, and they took Jackson right after in the 2018 draft

Pull da damn trigger on this already Lynch !!!!!

Green Bay might be saying no.

It would be a mistake. Pettis would easily be their second best WR.

Why does the outcome for them matter to us? We'd be better off with this trade. If they are more better off than we are, that shouldn't stop us.

It doesn't... I'm saying the exact opposite of what you think I said. I want Pettis to succeed and I agree with you that we should make the trade.

After all... Green Bay is the last team I'm worried about.

Oh you meant it would be a mistake for GB. My bad. Agreed.
May 25, 2020 at 10:34 AM
  • Kolohe
  • Hall of Fame
  • Posts: 63,092
I'm really hoping a trade gets done with Pettis for whoever. But I think a trade for Jackson straight up is more than fair for both sides.
May 25, 2020 at 11:15 AM
Originally posted by Kolohe:
I'm really hoping a trade gets done with Pettis for whoever. But I think a trade for Jackson straight up is more than fair for both sides.

Agree, they need WR and we need CB
Search
YouTube
Flipboard
Bluesky
Threads
✕
Search Share 49ersWebzone