Nick Bosa, EDGE, Ohio St(The Politics Free Thread)

Originally posted by Ninerjohn:

Originally posted by Hysterikal:

Originally posted by SupremeLeader16:

I'm so glad none of you are the gm. Baalke x100000

I swear that gets said every year.

Whats funny is that this guy wont say who he would take if there are no trade partners willing to give up multiple picks. It is really easy to say we should just trade down and get a boat load of draft picks. However, no one knows what that pick would actually be worth in a draft where there are no elite franchise QB prospects.

He's telling me Bosa isn't even a bonfire number one lock, but then proceeds to say we should trade him for 2-3 1st round picks + more. So I guess the team trading for him is a sucker? Lol he sucks but he's worth 4 picks. I have no words for that logic.

Originally posted by Cisco0623:

Originally posted by Ninerjohn:

Originally posted by Hysterikal:

Originally posted by SupremeLeader16:

I'm so glad none of you are the gm. Baalke x100000

+ Show all quotes
I swear that gets said every year.

Whats funny is that this guy wont say who he would take if there are no trade partners willing to give up multiple picks. It is really easy to say we should just trade down and get a boat load of draft picks. However, no one knows what that pick would actually be worth in a draft where there are no elite franchise QB prospects.

He's telling me Bosa isn't even a bonfire number one lock, but then proceeds to say we should trade him for 2-3 1st round picks + more. So I guess the team trading for him is a sucker? Lol he sucks but he's worth 4 picks. I have no words for that logic.

We should trade down and select Polite, all the Williams first rounders (Greedy, Jonah, Quinnen), Butler and Devin White boom. I'd take that haul instead of Bosa.

Originally posted by Hysterikal:

Originally posted by Cisco0623:

Originally posted by Ninerjohn:

Originally posted by Hysterikal:

Originally posted by SupremeLeader16:

I'm so glad none of you are the gm. Baalke x100000

I swear that gets said every year.

+ Show all quotes
Whats funny is that this guy wont say who he would take if there are no trade partners willing to give up multiple picks. It is really easy to say we should just trade down and get a boat load of draft picks. However, no one knows what that pick would actually be worth in a draft where there are no elite franchise QB prospects.

He's telling me Bosa isn't even a bonfire number one lock, but then proceeds to say we should trade him for 2-3 1st round picks + more. So I guess the team trading for him is a sucker? Lol he sucks but he's worth 4 picks. I have no words for that logic.

We should trade down and select Polite, all the Williams first rounders (Greedy, Jonah, Quinnen), Butler and Devin White boom. I'd take that haul instead of Bosa.

That's a trade I'd be in favor of lol

Originally posted by Hoovtrain:

Originally posted by SupremeLeader16:

Originally posted by Hoovtrain:

Originally posted by Ninerjohn:

Originally posted by SupremeLeader16:

He traded the number 3 pick in 2000 for 12 and 24 and two second round picks. Then traded #12 to jets for 16 and another 3rd rounder. We ended up with julian Peterson Ahmed Plummer Jason Webster and John Engelberger. All were solid players and had us right back In contention within a year. Soooo....

Also I would trade down from 1 to like 5 and trade again to like 7-8 and get BPA.

Get your facts right.

49ers traded the 3rd pick for the 12th and 24th pick plus a 4th and 5th rd pick. They didnt get an additional 2 2nd rd picks in that deal.

+ Show all quotes
Supreme doesn't believe in little things like facts John!

Whoaaa niners got the extra second from jets and not Washington OMG!

Sorry, you are the one spewing misinformation. And that's not what you said.
You are also over in the Buckner thread telling everyone that Clark and Rankin have more sacks than Buckner.

Bustier has one more sack than both. But Kenny Clark is a true nose tackle which means he takes on constant double teams and he has one less sack and has 10 more tackles than bustner. Sheldon rankin has what one sack less but he's way more of an impact player than bustner.

Originally posted by Hysterikal:

Originally posted by Cisco0623:

Originally posted by Ninerjohn:

Originally posted by Hysterikal:

Originally posted by SupremeLeader16:
I'm so glad none of you are the gm. Baalke x100000

I swear that gets said every year.

+ Show all quotes
Whats funny is that this guy wont say who he would take if there are no trade partners willing to give up multiple picks. It is really easy to say we should just trade down and get a boat load of draft picks. However, no one knows what that pick would actually be worth in a draft where there are no elite franchise QB prospects.

He's telling me Bosa isn't even a bonfire number one lock, but then proceeds to say we should trade him for 2-3 1st round picks + more. So I guess the team trading for him is a sucker? Lol he sucks but he's worth 4 picks. I have no words for that logic.

We should trade down and select Polite, all the Williams first rounders (Greedy, Jonah, Quinnen), Butler and Devin White boom. I'd take that haul instead of Bosa.

what? No #1 WR as well?

Originally posted by Ninerjohn:

what? No #1 WR as well?

Butlers got potential

Originally posted by SupremeLeader16:

Originally posted by Hoovtrain:

Originally posted by SupremeLeader16:

Originally posted by Hoovtrain:

Originally posted by Ninerjohn:

Originally posted by SupremeLeader16:

He traded the number 3 pick in 2000 for 12 and 24 and two second round picks. Then traded #12 to jets for 16 and another 3rd rounder. We ended up with julian Peterson Ahmed Plummer Jason Webster and John Engelberger. All were solid players and had us right back In contention within a year. Soooo....

Also I would trade down from 1 to like 5 and trade again to like 7-8 and get BPA.

Get your facts right.

49ers traded the 3rd pick for the 12th and 24th pick plus a 4th and 5th rd pick. They didnt get an additional 2 2nd rd picks in that deal.

Supreme doesn't believe in little things like facts John!

+ Show all quotes
Whoaaa niners got the extra second from jets and not Washington OMG!

Sorry, you are the one spewing misinformation. And that's not what you said.
You are also over in the Buckner thread telling everyone that Clark and Rankin have more sacks than Buckner.

Bustier has one more sack than both. But Kenny Clark is a true nose tackle which means he takes on constant double teams and he has one less sack and has 10 more tackles than bustner. Sheldon rankin has what one sack less but he's way more of an impact player than bustner.

Actually you are wrong again Lol
But hey, at least you can admit you are completely full of s**t.

The HONEST formula to landing the 1st overall pick is nothing more than keeping The Mule as the starting QB and ask him to throw about 40x a game.

tbh tampa was the last winnable game. first pick here we come

Originally posted by gold49digger:
tbh tampa was the last winnable game. first pick here we come

I don't want to get ahead of ourselves, especially with a chance Rams fuk us and rest their starters week 17.

You also have no idea what can happen...on paper we shouldn't win another game but NFL is crazy. All it takes is one team to totally overlook us and a QB like Case friggin Keenum to throw up a stink show with several turnovers(i know we're allergic to them but who knows) and we're stuck holding our dicks with #3 or even lower :(

Hopefully we do our job and tank properly...i'm looking more at the Chargers/Packers type of games versus the Tampa game. Close games where we can blame the refs and speculate on how we could've won them if Jimmy had played.

Originally posted by gold49digger:
tbh tampa was the last winnable game. first pick here we come

I hope so.

Originally posted by genus49:

Originally posted by gold49digger:

tbh tampa was the last winnable game. first pick here we come

I don't want to get ahead of ourselves, especially with a chance Rams fuk us and rest their starters week 17.

You also have no idea what can happen...on paper we shouldn't win another game but NFL is crazy. All it takes is one team to totally overlook us and a QB like Case friggin Keenum to throw up a stink show with several turnovers(i know we're allergic to them but who knows) and we're stuck holding our dicks with #3 or even lower :(

Hopefully we do our job and tank properly...i'm looking more at the Chargers/Packers type of games versus the Tampa game. Close games where we can blame the refs and speculate on how we could've won them if Jimmy had played.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but can't we lose out and still lose the #1 based on sos?

Originally posted by Cisco0623:

Originally posted by genus49:

Originally posted by gold49digger:
tbh tampa was the last winnable game. first pick here we come

I don't want to get ahead of ourselves, especially with a chance Rams fuk us and rest their starters week 17.

You also have no idea what can happen...on paper we shouldn't win another game but NFL is crazy. All it takes is one team to totally overlook us and a QB like Case friggin Keenum to throw up a stink show with several turnovers(i know we're allergic to them but who knows) and we're stuck holding our dicks with #3 or even lower :(

Hopefully we do our job and tank properly...i'm looking more at the Chargers/Packers type of games versus the Tampa game. Close games where we can blame the refs and speculate on how we could've won them if Jimmy had played.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but can't we lose out and still lose the #1 based on sos?

I think sos is the reason we have the first pick so its definitely possible to lose out .

Originally posted by gold49digger:

Originally posted by Cisco0623:

Originally posted by genus49:

Originally posted by gold49digger:

tbh tampa was the last winnable game. first pick here we come

+ Show all quotes
I don't want to get ahead of ourselves, especially with a chance Rams fuk us and rest their starters week 17.

You also have no idea what can happen...on paper we shouldn't win another game but NFL is crazy. All it takes is one team to totally overlook us and a QB like Case friggin Keenum to throw up a stink show with several turnovers(i know we're allergic to them but who knows) and we're stuck holding our dicks with #3 or even lower :(

Hopefully we do our job and tank properly...i'm looking more at the Chargers/Packers type of games versus the Tampa game. Close games where we can blame the refs and speculate on how we could've won them if Jimmy had played.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but can't we lose out and still lose the #1 based on sos?

I think sos is the reason we have the first pick so its definitely possible to lose out .

Yeah I just read up. If raiders or cardinals end up with a weaker sos it's theirs. Very realistic.

Originally posted by Cisco0623:

Originally posted by genus49:

Originally posted by gold49digger:
tbh tampa was the last winnable game. first pick here we come

I don't want to get ahead of ourselves, especially with a chance Rams fuk us and rest their starters week 17.

You also have no idea what can happen...on paper we shouldn't win another game but NFL is crazy. All it takes is one team to totally overlook us and a QB like Case friggin Keenum to throw up a stink show with several turnovers(i know we're allergic to them but who knows) and we're stuck holding our dicks with #3 or even lower :(

Hopefully we do our job and tank properly...i'm looking more at the Chargers/Packers type of games versus the Tampa game. Close games where we can blame the refs and speculate on how we could've won them if Jimmy had played.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but can't we lose out and still lose the #1 based on sos?

It's possible but I'm not sure the math would play out. Of course in situations like this it's never good but I think there's more of a chance Oakland taking it versus Arizona.

Arizona needs Atlanta to lose and Washington to lose, those are the only two teams we don't play that they do. And if Atlanta loses to them...it puts them at 3-13(assuming we still lose out)

Oakland plays a very different schedule but their SOS seems to be much higher than ours with Chiefs, Chargers and now Denver winning a bit more.

Hopefully Oakland beats Cinci and Cardinals pull one out of their ass vs Lions or Atlanta and we're the only team with 2 wins at the end of the season so we can get #1 and #33(great pick to have for trades as well)