LISTEN: What's Up With The 49ers DC Search? →

There are 134 users in the forums

Not sold on 49ers picking a WR with 13th Pick

  • mayo49
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 64,880
Originally posted by fan49:
Our defense has been legit for years. It's time to spice up the offense. We have continued to draft defense in the first round it's time to switch it up

Yeah, time to spice up the Offense - hopefully, the draft breaks in our favor. I'd love anyone of the three receivers.
  • FL9er
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 10,793
Pretty much I'm a "Lamb/Ruggs at 13 or trade down" guy.
I think it's possible to trade back and get Ruggs or Lamb. Especially if Love goes before 13 as I think he will. I could see one of the top 3 WRs falling to 21. Or 20 if someone trades in. More likely one could be had at 15.
  • mayo49
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 64,880
Yeah, scooter - I think that can possibly happen. I'd rather not have any drama and just take one of the wideouts at #13.
Trade down and get Mims and/or Claypool or Jefferson etc
Originally posted by FredFlintstone:
Originally posted by fan49:
If jeudys there you take him. I could pass on the others. Route runners win. We haven't had a seperation guy in years

I'm taking Jeudy or Ruggs, I'll trade down if both are gone. I don't think Ruggs is a 1 trick pony and I think if he puts it all together he can be the best wr in the class.

I don't understand why people can't realize that Ruggs is much more than speed. He runs routes well, he can go up to snag a ball from the air, and has excellent hands. If he was a few inches taller he'd be a top 5 pick.
Originally posted by maxsmart:
Trade down and get Mims and/or Claypool or Jefferson etc

Claypool is trash
I'm almost read to say that if it's not Lamb or Jeudy that I'm leaning towards trade down.
  • Kolohe
  • Hall of Fame
  • Posts: 63,105
Originally posted by NYniner85:
Originally posted by maxsmart:
Trade down and get Mims and/or Claypool or Jefferson etc

Claypool is trash

Honestly don't see anything from Claypool that Hurd can't do if healthy of course. Would much rather go with Michael Pittman Jr. or Tee Higgins.
  • mayo49
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 64,880
Originally posted by btthepunk:
Originally posted by FredFlintstone:
Originally posted by fan49:
If jeudys there you take him. I could pass on the others. Route runners win. We haven't had a seperation guy in years

I'm taking Jeudy or Ruggs, I'll trade down if both are gone. I don't think Ruggs is a 1 trick pony and I think if he puts it all together he can be the best wr in the class.

I don't understand why people can't realize that Ruggs is much more than speed. He runs routes well, he can go up to snag a ball from the air, and has excellent hands. If he was a few inches taller he'd be a top 5 pick.

I think the important ones know that Ruggs is more than just speed. The improtant ones being Shanny and Lynch.
Originally posted by mayo49:
I think the important ones know that Ruggs is more than just speed. The improtant ones being Shanny and Lynch.

How much does a low 1st or 5th rd. receiver make them want to cream, tho? Might change their perception of pick #13.
Originally posted by btthepunk:
Originally posted by FredFlintstone:
Originally posted by fan49:
If jeudys there you take him. I could pass on the others. Route runners win. We haven't had a seperation guy in years

I'm taking Jeudy or Ruggs, I'll trade down if both are gone. I don't think Ruggs is a 1 trick pony and I think if he puts it all together he can be the best wr in the class.

I don't understand why people can't realize that Ruggs is much more than speed. He runs routes well, he can go up to snag a ball from the air, and has excellent hands. If he was a few inches taller he'd be a top 5 pick.

this, folks acting like he came from a Big 12 spread offense. Dude played in the SEC against NFL prospects and for a coach that runs an NFL like team from top to bottom. He didnt just run go routes and posts his whole career, my fear is the Gruden will take him and he'll be the 1st wr to go. Like I said I want Ruggs or Jeudy, want absolutely nothing to do with Lamb I dont get the hype of playing in that silly Big 12 with no defense and YAC when Ruggs and Jeudy did the same thing in the SEC. And I can give a damn about 50-50 go up and get it over the defender balls, thats not Jimmy's game for one and if youre not a Julio or Megatron those plays are stupid unless its a must with time running out and like last play of the game crap.
It's going to be a trade down at 13.

What are realistic trades?

We should be in a prime position for teams who want a QB, WR or T trade, right? That's costly.
[ Edited by NCommand on Apr 11, 2020 at 12:59 PM ]
Only if teams are begging to trade up and have something valuable. Which then begs the question,...what were they begging to trade up and get? (Maybe a QB slid,etc)

We didn't give Buckner away for the sake of begging someone -- ANYONE -- to take our 13th pick from us.

Rest assured we will have multiple kids to take @ #13 if our dream pick isint available there.
Originally posted by random49er:
Only if teams are begging to trade up and have something valuable. Which then begs the question,...what were they begging to trade up and get? (Maybe a QB slid,etc)

We didn't give Buckner away for the sake of begging someone -- ANYONE -- to take our 13th pick from us.

Rest assured we will have multiple kids to take @ #13 if our dream pick isint available there.

I don't think anyone is asking to get ripped off. Sure, getting extra value back is great, but even looking at what is considered fair value is what I think most here are saying.

There may be one of the WRs there, a QB, an OT.

There will definitely also be a guy for us to take later than 13.
Search Share 49ersWebzone