2020 draft rumors

Any Niner rumors? - I'm craving for Niner news.

Originally posted by Hysterikal:

Originally posted by krizay:

Originally posted by NYniner85:

My first mock draft is up. Have at it. https://t.co/cisrdQCegM

— Peter Schrager (@PSchrags) April 1, 2020

Peter forget about Preston Williams?

Imma be breathless from laughter if the Cards ignore their Oline

If they don't we better draft another Dlineman.

Originally posted by mayo49:

Any Niner rumors? - I'm craving for Niner news.

Rumor is that the season will only be played on Madden and you're the new e-GM.

Originally posted by Phoenix49ers:

Originally posted by mayo49:
Any Niner rumors? - I'm craving for Niner news.

Rumor is that the season will only be played on Madden and you're the new e-GM.

AKA we're drafting a OT in the first and a WR in the 2nd

Originally posted by NYniner85:

Joe Douglas: Jets focused on supporting Sam Darnold with "protection and playmakers"https://t.co/GfNs1EAMQB pic.twitter.com/oAgbzetQVY

— Around The NFL (@AroundTheNFL) April 2, 2020

AKA we're drafting a OT in the first and a WR in the 2nd

I wouldn't rule out the opposite

Originally posted by OsBoogie:
I wouldn't rule out the opposite

Bigger drop off at OT vs WR.

Not really a rumor...but Matt Maiocco says he won't be surprised to see the Niners trade out of the #13 position if the guys at the top of their draft board are gone. Think about it...much more value trading out of #13 than 31. They'd still come out of it with 2 1st rounders, plus potentially a lot more for rds 2-5. The focus has been on trading out of #31...and that could still happen, but what if they traded out of both? They'd still have a 1st rd pick, plus flesh out picks in the 2-5 rds. Nice to have that many options.

Originally posted by CorvaNinerFan:
Not really a rumor...but Matt Maiocco says he won't be surprised to see the Niners trade out of the #13 position if the guys at the top of their draft board are gone. Think about it...much more value trading out of #13 than 31. They'd still come out of it with 2 1st rounders, plus potentially a lot more for rds 2-5. The focus has been on trading out of #31...and that could still happen, but what if they traded out of both? They'd still have a 1st rd pick, plus flesh out picks in the 2-5 rds. Nice to have that many options.

Quality instead of quantity.

Originally posted by mayo49:

Quality instead of quantity.

I find it funny that before the Defo trade everyone and their momma wanted to trade down for more picks. Everyone was all happy with the depth then.

Then all of a sudden we get the 13th and the draft pool is now tainted after 13.

Originally posted by krizay:

Originally posted by mayo49:

Quality instead of quantity.

I find it funny that before the Defo trade everyone and their momma wanted to trade down for more picks. Everyone was all happy with the depth then.

Then all of a sudden we get the 13th and the draft pool is now tainted after 13.

Lol agreed, we leave this draft with 2 starters day 1 and 4-5 guys who add depth and have great potential I'm happy.

Pepper your angus, boys. As we've come to learn, this regime doesn't necessarily adhere to BPA. They draft their guy, and if their guy isn't available, they want out.

"The 49ers will have plenty of options at different positions with the No. 13 overall pick," writes Maiocco. "If they love a player in that spot, they will undoubtedly make their selection. ... But if one or two targeted players are not there when it's the 49ers' turn to select in three weeks, they will almost assuredly look to bail out of No. 13. That would allow the 49ers to pick up more selections to take advantage of what is expected to be a deep draft at a number of different positions of need."

Originally posted by CorvaNinerFan:

much more value trading out of #13 than 31. They'd still come out of it with 2 1st rounders, plus potentially a lot more for rds 2-5. The focus has been on trading out of #31...and that could still happen, but what if they traded out of both? They'd still have a 1st rd pick, plus flesh out picks in the 2-5 rds. Nice to have that many options.

I agree. Historically statistically you get better value by trading down
But of course it's critical that you draft well

Originally posted by Heroism:

Pepper your angus, boys. As we've come to learn, this regime doesn't necessarily adhere to BPA. They draft their guy, and if their guy isn't available, they want out.

"The 49ers will have plenty of options at different positions with the No. 13 overall pick," writes Maiocco. "If they love a player in that spot, they will undoubtedly make their selection. ... But if one or two targeted players are not there when it's the 49ers' turn to select in three weeks, they will almost assuredly look to bail out of No. 13. That would allow the 49ers to pick up more selections to take advantage of what is expected to be a deep draft at a number of different positions of need."

Yes, that trend of locking onto their guy is well documented to date and must be factored in when trying to predict who they'll pick.

Who at 13 would be their guy?

Originally posted by NCommand:

Originally posted by Heroism:
Pepper your angus, boys. As we've come to learn, this regime doesn't necessarily adhere to BPA. They draft their guy, and if their guy isn't available, they want out.

"The 49ers will have plenty of options at different positions with the No. 13 overall pick," writes Maiocco. "If they love a player in that spot, they will undoubtedly make their selection. ... But if one or two targeted players are not there when it's the 49ers' turn to select in three weeks, they will almost assuredly look to bail out of No. 13. That would allow the 49ers to pick up more selections to take advantage of what is expected to be a deep draft at a number of different positions of need."

Yes, that trend of locking onto their guy is well documented to date and must be factored in when trying to predict who they'll pick.

Who at 13 would be their guy?

I think it has to be one of the receivers, IMO.