LISTEN: What's Up With The 49ers DC Search? →

There are 278 users in the forums

2020 draft rumors

Originally posted by FL9er:
Bigger drop off at OT vs WR.

depends who's there. I'd say the drop off from WR1 to whatever their next pick is bigger than the drop off from OT4 and whatever the next tier is
Originally posted by NCommand:
Yes, that trend of locking onto their guy is well documented to date and must be factored in when trying to predict who they'll pick.

Who at 13 would be their guy?

it's not one... Maiocco says 1 or 2. So say two that they think may be there. Then add that there are some they don't expect to be there that might? We're picking at 13, not 4. That number is not logical.
Originally posted by OsBoogie:
Originally posted by NCommand:
Yes, that trend of locking onto their guy is well documented to date and must be factored in when trying to predict who they'll pick.

Who at 13 would be their guy?

it's not one... Maiocco says 1 or 2. So say two that they think may be there. Then add that there are some they don't expect to be there that might? We're picking at 13, not 4. That number is not logical.

Yeah. The 1 or 2 are probably players they feel could be there. Guys they really really want.
Originally posted by mayo49:
I think it has to be one of the receivers, IMO.

I'm not so sure now.
Originally posted by NCommand:
Yeah. The 1 or 2 are probably players they feel could be there. Guys they really really want.

there's probably at least another 5 they really really want that they aren't expecting. Maybe 1 drops.

I mean, yeah... we know trade down is an option. I've been saying I'd rather trade down than take a guy like Kinlaw (who may very well turn out being a stud), but let's not pretend there's just 1 guy and if that 1 guy isn't there, they are out. it's pick 13. You can't only have 1 guy. Trade offers are not always good value.
Originally posted by OsBoogie:
Originally posted by NYniner85:

AKA we're drafting a OT in the first and a WR in the 2nd

I wouldn't rule out the opposite

I would based on who the GM/HC are
Originally posted by krizay:
I find it funny that before the Defo trade everyone and their momma wanted to trade down for more picks. Everyone was all happy with the depth then.

Then all of a sudden we get the 13th and the draft pool is now tainted after 13.

You can get an elite talent at 13, it's a lot less likely at 31, hence why people were an are still more about moving off of 31 vs 13.
Originally posted by NYniner85:
I would based on who the GM/HC are

after all the moves on the OL (albeit most questionable), I think Douglas has set himself up to have a choice here. Douglas definitely understands that Darnold needs weapons
Originally posted by OsBoogie:
after all the moves on the OL (albeit most questionable), I think Douglas has set himself up to have a choice here. Douglas definitely understands that Darnold needs weapons

Dude none of those moves are startable options...Fant is hot trash and will be forced to start. He's basically on a one yr deal. They have nothing at RT literally nothing.

Douglas is well known as a guy who loves the trenches. Gase has never drafted a WR early.

One of the top 4 OTs is gonna be there at 11
Originally posted by Heroism:
Pepper your angus, boys. As we've come to learn, this regime doesn't necessarily adhere to BPA. They draft their guy, and if their guy isn't available, they want out.

"The 49ers will have plenty of options at different positions with the No. 13 overall pick," writes Maiocco. "If they love a player in that spot, they will undoubtedly make their selection. ... But if one or two targeted players are not there when it's the 49ers' turn to select in three weeks, they will almost assuredly look to bail out of No. 13. That would allow the 49ers to pick up more selections to take advantage of what is expected to be a deep draft at a number of different positions of need."

If all three of the WRs are gone I'm all for moving down
Originally posted by NYniner85:
You can get an elite talent at 13, it's a lot less likely at 31, hence why people were an are still more about moving off of 31 vs 13.

I refuse to relive this conversation again.

So yes honey, you are right. We can only get elite talent at 13 and as long as it's a "Bama boy"
Originally posted by krizay:
Originally posted by NYniner85:
You can get an elite talent at 13, it's a lot less likely at 31, hence why people were an are still more about moving off of 31 vs 13.

I refuse to relive this conversation again.

So yes honey, you are right. We can only get elite talent at 13 and as long as it's a "Bama boy"

Don't respond then lol.

We get it you want to draft a million players and you want Aiyuk...I think we can all move on.
[ Edited by NYniner85 on Apr 3, 2020 at 6:57 AM ]
Originally posted by NYniner85:
Don't respond then lol.

We get it you want to draft a million players and you want Aiyuk...I think we can all move on.

Unlike some people im not fixated on 1 or in your case 2)

Ayiuk is fine. But id be alright with a slew of other WRs.

Because I have faith that Shanahan can scheme and get the ball in the hands of the WRs from all 50 states and not just Alabama
Originally posted by NYniner85:
Dude none of those moves are startable options...Fant is hot trash and will be forced to start. He's basically on a one yr deal. They have nothing at RT literally nothing.

Douglas is well known as a guy who loves the trenches. Gase has never drafted a WR early.

One of the top 4 OTs is gonna be there at 11

actually, Fant is basically 2 year deal at a pretty hefty price. I agree he's trash but they paid him like he's not. You can definitely get a RT at 48.
I'm not saying you're wrong but I think there's definitely a chance that they pick a WR1 over the OT4.
Search Share 49ersWebzone