Originally posted by PhillyNiner:
He is really green, only one year of college experience against much weaker competition and there are some real easy to spot mechanical inconsistencies that lead to errant passes. He is plutonium grade raw material, don't get me wrong but it really shows that he has the longest to go in his development before he is ready. If he was the choice I would want to keep Jimmy for two years. I break it down like this ...Jones is the pick send Jimmy at the draft, If it is Fields keep Jimmy a year and see if he can stay healthy, if it is Lance keep Jimmy for two and see where you are middle of next year around the deadline.
I'm also just not on board with the general consensus that Lance is the least pro ready. People who like Jones are now lumping in high school starts to cover up the fact that Jones and Lance have the same number of college starts. If you're trying to go the "level of competition" route with experience, I just can't see it with Jones because the offense he played on was SO superior that he was rarely pressured. Does it matter if you played at the FBS level if your team was so good that you had consistently clean pockets and skill players who were open consistently?
Fields has a wealth of experience in both regards, for sure, and is absolutely a MUCH better selection than Jones. When comparing the experience of Fields vs Lance, I don't see his "scheme related" experience as giving him that much of a leg up, however. I don't feel that what he was doing in Ohio State's system will translate very well to what the 49ers do. On the other hand, Lance's admittedly limited experience comes in perhaps one of the most similar offensive systems you could find at the college level to the 49ers.
[ Edited by IceMan1763 on Apr 8, 2021 at 6:16 AM ]