Originally posted by Since07:
Originally posted by gold49digger:
I personally saw some McNabb in him. Honestly I'm not as high on trey as I am with Fields but I would be excited too if we get lance.
I'll take Lance over Fields, That 4.4 40 doesn't matter if he isn't elusive. Lance looks like he had the natural vision of a runner. Fields has more tape and track record but Lance has that beautiful deep ball
Honestly I think Fields ran a 4.44. They say add on .05 to pro day numbers which puts him at about a 4.5. That number seems about right when compared with the tape. He's athletic but doesn't pull away from defenders when running like a Lamar or Vick. Lance is the same way but I agree he's a much more natural and gifted runner. 1100 yds at 6.5 a pop as a nineteen year old and then 140 in his only game this year. Really impressive runner.
[ Edited by roasthawg on Apr 18, 2021 at 10:29 AM ]