LISTEN: What's Up With The 49ers DC Search? →

There are 261 users in the forums

Trey Lance QB NDSU

Trey Lance QB NDSU

Originally posted by Jikkle49:
Originally posted by Heroism:
Simms confirms it's Adam Peters leading the charge for Trey Lance


I'd venture to guess this kind of stuff happens more often than naught inside NFL front offices than gets reported.

We assume that it's like with us fans on message boards and twitter that people are shouting at each other, Shanahan is throwing chairs across the room, and Peters is taking his tie off and telling Shanahan to take it outside. And while it might not be like that inside for all we know it could be ugly inside the building with some heated discussions.

The reality probably is Shanahan and Lynch/Peters probably love both guys it's just Shanahan wants Jones a little more and everybody else wants Lance a little more and now you're going through the back and forth trying to make the case for your guy over the other.

I doubt they're shouting at each other. Shanahan probably just tunes out when the personnel guys are giving their opinion on QBs. I doubt he cares that much about what Peters and Lynch have to say about QBs. He might listen more to Scangarello and Mcdaniels and his dad.
[ Edited by 49ersRing on Apr 26, 2021 at 11:43 AM ]
Originally posted by 49ersRing:
Shanahan is the HC, the true GM, and probably eventually the owner as well. I'd be surprised if he wasn't there.

Yeah they just want to show some solidarity by having him join the call with Lynch. No benefit or rationale to revealing the pick early.
Originally posted by Phoenix49ers:
Originally posted by NYniner85:
I mean playing devils advocate, McCorkle got what like 250 more passing attempts which is about 5 games worth of passing attempts in college. Yet Lance is some raw prospect?

250 more passing attempts vs SEC defenses and schemes that more closely correspond to the NFL versus playing killer defenses like...Central Arkansas?

Then why keep Jimmy? We aren't starting a rookie day 1, The whole point is drafting a qb to sit a year then take over. Mac doesn't need to sit a year.
[ Edited by crusher49er on Apr 26, 2021 at 11:44 AM ]
Originally posted by Phoenix49ers:
Originally posted by NYniner85:
I mean playing devils advocate, McCorkle got what like 250 more passing attempts which is about 5 games worth of passing attempts in college. Yet Lance is some raw prospect?

250 more passing attempts vs SEC defenses and schemes that more closely correspond to the NFL versus playing killer defenses like...Central Arkansas?

OH don't forget about 58% of Jones' snaps which were RPO/screens and play-action out of shotgun...mostly predetermined first reads. SEC had one defense in the top 12 this yr (2 if you count Bama at 20th overall)

I don't care if you're playing Joe blow...he was running a pro offense. He got half the play at the LOS then had to adjust the play based on persnap reads. He called his protections. Kid spent all off season getting a NFL QB's play book going though a NFL QBs work week. He has been studying to play in the NFL instead of kicking the s**t out of the Montana state.

If he stayed another yr, he's the heavy favorite to go #1 SF gets him a yr earlier.
Originally posted by crusher49er:
Originally posted by Phoenix49ers:
Originally posted by NYniner85:
I mean playing devils advocate, McCorkle got what like 250 more passing attempts which is about 5 games worth of passing attempts in college. Yet Lance is some raw prospect?

250 more passing attempts vs SEC defenses and schemes that more closely correspond to the NFL versus playing killer defenses like...Central Arkansas?

Then why keep Jimmy? We aren't starting a rookie day 1, The whole point is drafting a qb to sit a year then take over. Mac doesn't need to sit a year.

Jimmy would obviously be Alex Smith in this role. Trey is a stud
Originally posted by 49ersRing:
Originally posted by 5_Golden_Rings:
Originally posted by 49ersRing:
Originally posted by 5_Golden_Rings:
Originally posted by 49ersRing:
Originally posted by 5_Golden_Rings:
Originally posted by a49erfan77:
Originally posted by NYniner85:

you'd think it wouldn't be this difficult

They meant skin color, not ability.

I think it's the other way around. Fans want the skin color. Shanahan, on the other hand, wants the guy that's gonna make Shanahan look like a superstar (as opposed to an actual superstar player).

Yea? I think most fans here would be happy with Fields or Lawrence or Wilson or even Lance. Shanahan is the one that only ever seems to choose QBs of a certain skintone.

Shanahan has literally only drafted one QB, and fought for another (Cousins). He traded for Jimmy because the Patriots offered.

He also signed Josh Johnson.

This take is lazy. It's more than lazy. It's f**king stupid.

Oh wow, he signed Josh Johnson. The fourth QB on the depth chart. That refutes any possibility of bias.

C'mon man, before you have a stroke over the slightest possibility of racial bias taking a role, maybe consider you're the one that first claimed that the fans want a QB based purely on race and that Shanahan doesn't care. Meanwhile, Shanahan didn't want RG3, didn't want Kaepernick, didn't want Watson, didn't want Mahomes, didn't want Fields, doesn't want Lance. Any one of those individually could easily be justified or explained, but the trend is there and cannot be refuted by merely pointing at Josh Johnson, a guy that will never play.

Can we get a facepalm emoji?

(1) He didn't want Kap. And he didn't want Gabbert either. Both mobile QBs who struggled with on time pocket passing.

(2) RGIII SUCKS! He was right then and he was right now. As soon as teams started scheming for the zone read he disappeared into nothing. Kind of like what happened with Kap.

(3) The 49ers were interested in Watson actually. But to them Cousins was a done deal.

(4) Most of the people HERE didn't want Mahomes either.

(5) Fields runs a college version of the run and shoot. It is clear why Shanahan wouldn't want him.

(6) The team may well pick Lance. But he has accuracy problems. That's a fact.

Lastly, HOW MANY WHITE QBS DID THEY PASS TO TAKE BEATHARD? They picked Beathard because Shanahan has a type. The type is not "white QB." The type is "pocket QB who doesn't bail on the play with his legs.

Your. Take. Is. STUPID.

Ok, dude. You accused 49er fans of wanting the next QB based on race and then act silly when shown how that made no sense. I didn't even say Shanahan was racist, but pointed out how if anything, his long history of preferring a certain type of QB reflects more of a bias than whatever nonsense you were claiming. Your points to refute that make zero sense, which you probably know (a racial bias means they have to take the first white QB possible? What ). But whatever, I've clearly touched a nerve, so I'll drop it.

Uh, no, that's not what happened. Someone ELSE said Shanahan was picking based on race (actually several people), and I said no, the only people worried about the race of these QBs are the ones claiming Shanahan is picking based on race.

Drop it if you want. I won't, because I'm interested in observable reality. Shanahan has PASSED on QBs who default to legs before exhausting the play, and he has SAID that he doesn't trust guys who default to their legs instead of exhausting the play, because they've done that all their lives, which likely inhibited their growth in, for example, learning how to exhaust a play.

And this goes back before Kyle Shanahan. This goes back clear to Steve Young, who I remember saying in an interview a couple decades ago that MIKE Shanahan helped him get much better at exhausting all options in the play before defaulting to his legs. Hell, Bill Walsh was also pushing to mold him that way.

Oh yeah, same thing seems to have happened with John Elway.

This pattern of wanting QBs to sit in the pocket and exhaust the play goes back decades in this coaching tree. DECADES. There are DECADES worth of evidence about what type of QB the people who run this scheme and variations of it prefer. DECADES. And I don't just mean the roster, since that will be your retort (derp they were almost all white). Not just the roster. The things said. The evidence of players who were coached to drastically change how they play (e.g., Steve Young).

The type is a QB who exhausts all options in the play before improvising.

.

That said, there's evidence Shanahan's finally changing his mind on that. Hopefully the change is complete so he doesn't blow this chance to take Lance.
Originally posted by NYniner85:
OH don't forget about 58% of Jones' snaps which were RPO/screens and play-action out of shotgun...mostly predetermined first reads. SEC had one defense in the top 12 this yr (2 if you count Bama at 20th overall)

I don't care if you're playing Joe blow...he was running a pro offense. He got half the play at the LOS then had to adjust the play based on persnap reads. He called his protections. Kid spent all off season getting a NFL QB's play book going though a NFL QBs work week. He has been studying to play in the NFL instead of kicking the s**t out of the Montana state.

If he stayed another yr, he's the heavy favorite to go #1 SF gets him a yr earlier.

Fields faced 3 in the top 5.
Nearly every expert, all analysts, your own scouting deppartment, adam peters, john lynch, nearly the whole fanbase.
And then there is Shanahan wanting to outsmart everyone.
like with the guys he "banged the table for" in recent drafts....
Originally posted by SanDiego49er:
Originally posted by Aj_hwd954:
So much hype for a project player that needs 1-2 years to groom because he gets compared to a player a lot of NFL fans and twitter GMs thought would bust

not buying the Tray Lance hype AT ALL

I just can't imagine how he is ahead of Justin Fields as of right now. There is just no way. Future projection and upside potential? That's anybodies guess. You could throw a dart at a dart board. QB's are the biggest crap shoot in the whole draft. You have no idea what will happen and the experts often get it wrong. They are more wrong than right.

Not trying to knock Fields, but Lance has OFF THE CHARTS football character (character in general, but his desire to learn, his humility and intelligence are way beyond the moon).

So that's one reason, along with his greater experience under center, calling plays in the huddle, and being in control of pre-snap protections (the latter is a HUGE advantage). And yeah, I know someone is going to post the gif of Fields pointing out a blitz and throwing a hot TD to the TE, but the fact is, Lance is in control of the line of scrimmage and protections every single play, and he's not looking at the sideline before every snap to let the coach read the defense for him.
Originally posted by socal1632:
Can't get over that we're being mocked a 2nd round talent at the 3d pick. Has to be a nightmare scenario dream

You're talking about Mac Jones, right? That would be sad if you took him at #3.
Originally posted by SanDiego49er:
Originally posted by NYniner85:
Originally posted by Heroism:
Originally posted by NYniner85:
Now turn your back on PA. f**k McCorkle lol


you could say that for about 70% of the fan base all the same...this kid is gonna get booed so bad.

i have no idea why people are so confident in Kyle when it comes to evaluating...he hasn't proven to be great at it.

The 49ers have proven bad at evaluating QB's. I don't trust them. But I hope for the best.

I said this months ago and got reamed for it. Glad the forums have finally realized how OBVIOUSLY elite Mahomes' college tape was, and how dumb Shanahan was for ignoring it.
Originally posted by NYniner85:
It's a visual...you've seen one kid basically run the same concepts. I agree it shouldn't be the only reason you draft a guy. I do remember Kyle loving that CJ ran PA from under center...same as Kirk in college.

toss in everything else Lance adds, moving ahead of ATL (who reportedly loved Lance) and keeping Jimmy for a yr...it makes sense

I think the last sentence is something that people love to ignore. NO ONE was mocking Jones in the top 10 until the 49ers went to #3. However, after Lance's Pro Day he started showing up in mocks to ATL at #4. Couple days later, BOOM, 9ers jump them to #3.
Originally posted by crusher49er:
Then why keep Jimmy? We aren't starting a rookie day 1, The whole point is drafting a qb to sit a year then take over. Mac doesn't need to sit a year.

We don't know that they are keeping Garoppolo. Its hardly a foregone conclusion.
Originally posted by Phoenix49ers:
Originally posted by crusher49er:
Then why keep Jimmy? We aren't starting a rookie day 1, The whole point is drafting a qb to sit a year then take over. Mac doesn't need to sit a year.

We don't know that they are keeping Garoppolo. Its hardly a foregone conclusion.

if we take mac then i dont see why we'd keep jimmy tbh
Originally posted by socal1632:
Originally posted by crusher49er:
Originally posted by Phoenix49ers:
Originally posted by NYniner85:
I mean playing devils advocate, McCorkle got what like 250 more passing attempts which is about 5 games worth of passing attempts in college. Yet Lance is some raw prospect?

250 more passing attempts vs SEC defenses and schemes that more closely correspond to the NFL versus playing killer defenses like...Central Arkansas?

Then why keep Jimmy? We aren't starting a rookie day 1, The whole point is drafting a qb to sit a year then take over. Mac doesn't need to sit a year.

Jimmy would obviously be Alex Smith in this role. Trey is a stud

I meant what's the point of drafting Mac Jones if he won't start right away. Lance is the obvious choice here.
Search Share 49ersWebzone