LISTEN: Looking For The 49ers' New DC With Jason Aponte →

There are 265 users in the forums

Trey Lance QB NDSU

Trey Lance QB NDSU

Originally posted by NYniner85:
Originally posted by 5_Golden_Rings:
Yes, I agree, "traits" is the most important thing. I'm not huge on "upside." To me that just means "physical talent," and quite frankly, if a QB doesn't show an elite arm, I'm swiping left. We're talking about a first round pick, after all. The rest, regarding mobility and all that, I'm more interested in functional mobility to buy time than the ability to juke people down the field. That's not to say I hold that against Lance.

But speaking of traits, that's why I like Fields better. The number one trait I look at, after swiping left on all the lesser arm strength guys, is accuracy. And it seems to me Fields wins here. More to watch, but it looks like Fields is in that top three tier of this draft in terms of accuracy and Lance is in the next. And I don't mean "the ability to throw amazing passes." I mean consistent accuracy. Jimmy can throw amazing passes, too. But he misses a lot of deep overs and things like that due to bad fundamentals (have NOT watched Lance in enough detail to see if he has something similar, despite what the article I cited claimed. I still have to verify that, which is why I said he CLAIMED it. But if it's true, that's a hard swipe left. Not many QBs fix their mechanical issues).

After that, traits for me, irrespective of the QB in question, go something like this (not necessarily in this order):

Showing no fear in the face of the pass rush
Quick release
Throwing accurately off platform
Anticipation

And then it goes to the "intangible" traits (which are really actually tangible), such as:

Using eyes to manipulate defenders
Pump faking
Most importantly: showing that he maintains mental control under chaos (this one is hard to quantify, but you know it when you see it; the subtle pump fake passed the line of scrimmage to gain a few more yards [Mahomes did this]; remembering where his guys are so that when he escapes he can get the ball to him while he's being devoured).

This right here is what set Mahomes apart for me in the spring of 2017. He had CONTROL, including during chaotic moments, and never forgot all the subtle ways to manipulate a defense. Lots of QBs have "control;" But very few of them also have Brett Favre's arm. But when a QB is able to remember everything he has at his disposal, even when the noose is closing in, and he has an elite arm, that's when you know you have a potentially great QB. This is also something I recently noticed watching Watson's college tape (I was so obsessed with Mahomes I didn't watch much of any QB in 2017). In particular, Watson seems extremely calm, as if all potential options are kind of floating in the aether around his head, ready to be picked and executed at a moment's notice. Other, lesser QBs seem to be reacting only on instinct, and don't appear to think in that cold, calculating manner when the ship is sinking.

I'm also sure everyone feels this way. Which then means that the secret is people not knowing when they see it.

Anyway, back to accuracy. Basically, clean pocket passing doesn't impress me at all, BUT if the pocket is clean and a guy is open down field, the QB prospect better hit that 19 times out of twenty. Otherwise, why are you wasting a first round pick? And that's why I'd take Fields over Lance. I'm not saying Lance doesn't have first round accuracy. I just don't think he has Field's accuracy, and he doesn't seem to have his reaction time. I don't mean with his legs. I mean see something change and throw it quickly where maybe he didn't think he was going to initially.

again I'm not debating Fields vs Lance. Never was. You said you don't like Lance, correct?

You've also said you've only watch what amounts to a practice game this yr. IMO you're forming quite the opinion on a prospect off of not too much.

Both Fields and Lance need to develop a lot more. I have Fields ranked higher.

Nah, I was basing it on the mock draft posted. Not sure who posted it. But that guy had Lance going to us and Fields to the Patriots.

There's a chance Shanahan would do it, of course. I mean he thought Beathard was great because Beathard had experience doing I-form play-action. I hope he's learned from his mistake. This isn't 2005. That way of eliminating guys is no longer all that trustworthy.
Originally posted by 5_Golden_Rings:
Nah, I was basing it on the mock draft posted. Not sure who posted it. But that guy had Lance going to us and Fields to the Patriots.

There's a chance Shanahan would do it, of course. I mean he thought Beathard was great because Beathard had experience doing I-form play-action. I hope he's learned from his mistake. This isn't 2005. That way of eliminating guys is no longer all that trustworthy.

Huh? Kyle's passing game is rooted in play-action and having the ability to take snaps from under center. So what his scheme isn't good? I see no problem liking a player that can handle play-action well. That s**t is important to this team (and all of the shanny versions out there). Bootlegs, being able to throw form multiple platforms on the run, having good footwork are all important in SF.

Beathard was basically a 4th rd pick, he was never meant to be the starter. They should always be developing a guy even if they have the guy. His pocket awareness and field vision are down right horrible. That's his problem. That's also Jimmy's issue too.

Also that has nothing to do with Fields, he's good off play-action as well. He's not running a straight up air raid offense either.
[ Edited by NYniner85 on Feb 4, 2021 at 1:02 PM ]
Originally posted by NYniner85:
Originally posted by 5_Golden_Rings:
Nah, I was basing it on the mock draft posted. Not sure who posted it. But that guy had Lance going to us and Fields to the Patriots.

There's a chance Shanahan would do it, of course. I mean he thought Beathard was great because Beathard had experience doing I-form play-action. I hope he's learned from his mistake. This isn't 2005. That way of eliminating guys is no longer all that trustworthy.

Huh? Kyle's passing game is rooted in play-action and having the ability to take snaps from under center. So what his scheme isn't good? I see no problem liking a player that can handle play-action well. That s**t is important to this team (and all of the shanny versions out there). Bootlegs, being able to throw form multiple platforms on the run, having good footwork are all important in SF.

Beathard was basically a 4th rd pick, he was never meant to be the starter. They should always be developing a guy even if they have the guy. His pocket awareness and field vision are down right horrible. That's his problem. That's also Jimmy's issue too.

Also that has nothing to do with Fields, he's good off play-action as well. He's not running a straight up air raid offense either.

No, I'm not saying it's not important. What I'm saying is that it absolutely does not matter to me whether or not a college QB did a lot of I-form play-action stuff in college.

Play-action works for Shanahan for one reason: it's easy. It makes things way easier for a quarterback. It drastically reduces the mental pressure on reads. It drastically reduces what a defense can do. It sucks up linebackers, defining coverage and opening windows. So no, I'm not impressed at all if a college QB does this. Constant screens and crap like that is easier (which seems to be the most common thing done in college ball), but I'm not seeing the difficulty in running a play-action pass if you've never done it before. One training camp ought to fix it, and then he, too, can experience the joy of having the field cut in half, the read well defined, and the defense placed in a massive bind.

Here's what does impress me: a college QB that has to stand in a pocket and convert on third and longs. Drop back passing, or passing from shotgun where he has to read a defense and react.
Some nice posts between you guys, one thing I think you've missed Rings is players improving mechanics. Lance looked notably different from last year to this game.

If you couldn't do it then these off-season QB gurus would be out of work!

I agree with the accuracy part in the Fields over Lance discussion, especially in the mid range. I do think this is linked to his mechanics that he's already improving.

The Playaction thing is important to our offense, it is definitely something you can learn, but it's nice to see someone already show a talent for it.
Originally posted by 5_Golden_Rings:

Here's what does impress me: a college QB that has to stand in a pocket and convert on third and longs. Drop back passing, or passing from shotgun where he has to read a defense and react.

well then you should be in the Mac Jones thread talking him up lol.

Again for me it's about traits and ceiling. He's already got a great base line with the play-action, playing under center, bootleg, RPOs coming into the league. He calls his own protections. AFTER that he has probably the best arm out of the top 5 QBs. He's probability the most athletic. You can't man to man on 3rd downs with him as the QB.

It's all about understanding him from the neck up. Can he process information. Can he learn to read a defense. Does he understand progressions. I'd say that's a question mark for most of these QBs because MOST aren't asked to do any of that. I have read he's all football. All I've read is he's all football and smart as s**t.

you can work with this


this is stuff Shanny loves


Again he's not my favorite QB for this team (Wilson is my guy) I would have ZERO problems taking him. I think our HC would turn him into a monster.
[ Edited by NYniner85 on Feb 4, 2021 at 1:28 PM ]
Originally posted by 49erBigMac:
Some nice posts between you guys, one thing I think you've missed Rings is players improving mechanics. Lance looked notably different from last year to this game.

If you couldn't do it then these off-season QB gurus would be out of work!

I agree with the accuracy part in the Fields over Lance discussion, especially in the mid range. I do think this is linked to his mechanics that he's already improving.

The Playaction thing is important to our offense, it is definitely something you can learn, but it's nice to see someone already show a talent for it.

I love that he's been working on his mechanics through this lost season. Dude is putting in the time
Play action is easy in theory and execution but is tedious and mentally taxing to repeat play-after-play, week-after-week in a Shanahan-style offense. A lot of guys struggle with the footwork and timing aspect of marrying their feet with pulling the ball out from the ball-carrier, snapping their head around, and being in unison with the route concepts. Also, the most overlooked aspect is convincingly selling the give at the mesh point. It seems so simple, but humans have a tendency to get LAZY, especially when they're tired. It's the super meticulous guys like Peyton Manning that focus on making every single rep, week after week, look exactly the same.

But I can't unsee Nate Davis now.
[ Edited by Heroism on Feb 4, 2021 at 1:38 PM ]
While I'm still really iffy on Lance because he seems so boom or bust to me, he at least seems to show he's got the work ethic you'd need to be successful in the NFL. He's got the raw ability, the athleticism, and he's willing to work. Like many, I agree that he's going to have a learning curve and adjustment period.

I'm not entirely sold on him, but, I won't be crying if we take him. Early on, I could see plenty of things Shanahan would like. I just hope we take the right guy in the end. We've gotta dip into this class. Too much talent along with questions at the position on this team to not do so.
Originally posted by Heroism:
Play action is easy in theory and execution but is tedious and mentally taxing to repeat play-after-play, week-after-week in a Shanahan-style offense. A lot of guys struggle with the footwork and timing aspect of marrying their feet with pulling the ball out from the ball-carrier, snapping their head around, and being in unison with the route concepts. Also, the most overlooked aspect is convincingly selling the give at the mesh point. It seems so simple, but humans have a tendency to get LAZY, especially when they're tired. It's the super meticulous guys like Peyton Manning that focus on making every single rep, week after week, look exactly the same.

But I can't unsee Nate Davis now.

Agreed...minus Nate Davis lol. It's a lazy comp but Josh Allen or Wentz kinda makes sense.

fun fact Lance won't even be old enough to have a drink until after the draft lol.

he's only 20 and doesn't turn 21 until may. That's pretty wild.
Originally posted by NYniner85:
Agreed...minus Nate Davis lol. It's a lazy comp but Josh Allen or Wentz kinda makes sense.

fun fact Lance won't even be old enough to have a drink until after the draft lol.

he's only 20 and doesn't turn 21 until may. That's pretty wild.

That is crazy! I don't blame him for coming out now considering the Covid situation with his team, but maybe he should have transferred and played at a higher level next year.

I don't need to see anymore of him at FCS level and I'm willing to take a punt, but it would have been nice to see him take over at Ohio State or in the SEC.
Originally posted by NYniner85:
Agreed...minus Nate Davis lol. It's a lazy comp but Josh Allen or Wentz kinda makes sense.

Bwahaha, all jokes aside. Trey Lance would be a combination of the most exciting, frustrating, and terrifying draft pick at 12. Exciting because his potential under Shanny is tantalizing, but frustrating because he doesn't help us in 2021. And terrifying because his body of work is so tiny that we don't really know who we're getting.
[ Edited by Heroism on Feb 4, 2021 at 2:47 PM ]
Originally posted by Heroism:
Bwahaha, all jokes aside. Trey Lance would be a combination of the most exciting, frustrating, and terrifying draft pick at 12. Exciting because his potential under Shanny is tantalizing, but frustrating because he doesn't help us in 2021. And terrifying because his body of work is so tiny that we don't really know who we're getting.

That I agree with, the reason I'd be willing is that I still have a fair amount of faith in Jimmy, without being completely sold he's our future.

I think Lance gives the right mix of what we're looking for, great reason to sit him, pressure on Jimmy and hopefully one will still have trade value when you come to decide between them.
Originally posted by 49erBigMac:
Some nice posts between you guys, one thing I think you've missed Rings is players improving mechanics. Lance looked notably different from last year to this game.

If you couldn't do it then these off-season QB gurus would be out of work!

I agree with the accuracy part in the Fields over Lance discussion, especially in the mid range. I do think this is linked to his mechanics that he's already improving.

The Playaction thing is important to our offense, it is definitely something you can learn, but it's nice to see someone already show a talent for it.

Yeah, it's possible to improve mechanics, but so many coaches I've seen say they don't like messing with a QB's release or any of that. I think Harbaugh said that.
If a guy is willing to do it himself, that's great. I think Mustache guy from Jacksonville did, and it improved his net arm strength a bit.
Originally posted by 5_Golden_Rings:
Yeah, it's possible to improve mechanics, but so many coaches I've seen say they don't like messing with a QB's release or any of that. I think Harbaugh said that.
If a guy is willing to do it himself, that's great. I think Mustache guy from Jacksonville did, and it improved his net arm strength a bit.

There's not enough time in the offseason now with all limitations put into the powderpuff CBA. If a QB wants to improve their mechanics, the onus is on them to seek out instruction and bust their ass off in the offseason.

Which is precisely why most QBs never improve nowadays.
[ Edited by Heroism on Feb 4, 2021 at 3:07 PM ]
  • mayo49
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 64,641
Lance is a poor man's Mahomes.
Search Share 49ersWebzone