Originally posted by Bay2Bay9erAllday:
WF analysis won't fly here. We prefer to get our analyses from random dudes on twitter.
what makes WF any better? Like I said too each their own
[ Edited by NYniner85 on Feb 28, 2021 at 4:04 PM ]
There are 249 users in the forums
Originally posted by Bay2Bay9erAllday:
WF analysis won't fly here. We prefer to get our analyses from random dudes on twitter.
Originally posted by NYniner85:
Originally posted by Bay2Bay9erAllday:
WF analysis won't fly here. We prefer to get our analyses from random dudes on twitter.
what makes WF any better? Like I said too each their own
Originally posted by Bay2Bay9erAllday:
Quality and content, but that's just me. Others like randos on Twitter. Like you said to each their own.
Walter Football is awful and has a lot of horrendous posts but I don't think any will come close to when Adrian Peterson was suspended and they went on a rant about how the NFL did a disservice to people who picked him #1 in fantasy
— Justis Mosqueda (@JuMosq) January 4, 2018
Originally posted by Bay2Bay9erAllday:
WF analysis won't fly here. We prefer to get our analyses from random dudes on twitter.
Originally posted by NYniner85:
Originally posted by Bay2Bay9erAllday:
Quality and content, but that's just me. Others like randos on Twitter. Like you said to each their own.
Who's considered a "rando"? Film is film.
I'm sorry what makes WF's content "quality"?
here's a thread of WF's quality content...
Walter Football is awful and has a lot of horrendous posts but I don't think any will come close to when Adrian Peterson was suspended and they went on a rant about how the NFL did a disservice to people who picked him #1 in fantasy
— Justis Mosqueda (@JuMosq) January 4, 2018
Originally posted by krizay:
Originally posted by Bay2Bay9erAllday:
WF analysis won't fly here. We prefer to get our analyses from random dudes on twitter.
Originally posted by Bay2Bay9erAllday:
Originally posted by krizay:
Originally posted by Bay2Bay9erAllday:
WF analysis won't fly here. We prefer to get our analyses from random dudes on twitter.
Originally posted by NYniner85:
Originally posted by Bay2Bay9erAllday:
Originally posted by krizay:
Originally posted by Bay2Bay9erAllday:
WF analysis won't fly here. We prefer to get our analyses from random dudes on twitter.
I know like daniel jeremiah 🙃
Originally posted by Bay2Bay9erAllday:
I guess not to each their own.
Btw who's Justis Mosqueda?
Originally posted by Bay2Bay9erAllday:
IMO Daniel Jeremiah >>>> Justis Mosqueda
Originally posted by krizay:
Walterfootball website is garbage but their analysis is no different than anyone else
Player Comparison: Matt Barkley. I think Jones could end up being a similar quarterback to Barkley in the NFL. Some team sources agreed with the Barkley comparison, others said a shorter A.J. McCarron, and another suggested a stronger-armed Jake Fromm. Barkley (6-2, 234) and Jones are similar in size with some skill-set limitations.I don't think Jones is that bad at all...and I agree their website is junk.
Originally posted by NYniner85:
Originally posted by Bay2Bay9erAllday:
IMO Daniel Jeremiah >>>> Justis Mosqueda
Oh I value DJ's opinion and enjoy his content. I listen to all his podcasts as well
this has nothing to do with Mosqueda (it's about the content in the thread). He's also a good quality scout as well though. Walter not so much imo.
Originally posted by NYniner85:
WF on Mac Jones (woof)
Player Comparison: Matt Barkley. I think Jones could end up being a similar quarterback to Barkley in the NFL. Some team sources agreed with the Barkley comparison, others said a shorter A.J. McCarron, and another suggested a stronger-armed Jake Fromm. Barkley (6-2, 234) and Jones are similar in size with some skill-set limitations.I don't think Jones is that bad at all...and I agree their website is junk.
Originally posted by NYniner85:
Originally posted by krizay:
Walterfootball website is garbage but their analysis is no different than anyone else
WF on Mac Jones (woof)
Player Comparison: Matt Barkley. I think Jones could end up being a similar quarterback to Barkley in the NFL. Some team sources agreed with the Barkley comparison, others said a shorter A.J. McCarron, and another suggested a stronger-armed Jake Fromm. Barkley (6-2, 234) and Jones are similar in size with some skill-set limitations.I don't think Jones is that bad at all...and I agree their website is junk.