Trey Lance QB NDSU

Originally posted by mayo49:
Lance is a fantasy, boys. Need a major trade up to get him.

Disagree.

Originally posted by NYniner85:

Originally posted by mayo49:
Lance is a fantasy, boys. Need a major trade up to get him.

Disagree.

Why?

Originally posted by mayo49:
Yeah, the best CB, TE or WR can fall to us if all the QB's go early.

If that's the case I will expect them to try to move down. I don't see them taking a CB at 12 and I can't see pass-catcher being the pick regardless. I would love Waddle/Pitts but extra picks (maybe future picks) might be more enticing, if they don't get their QB.

Originally posted by mayo49:
Why?

I mean what's a massive trade up? I don't see moving to say 7 as a massive trade up...I don't see Lance going any sooner than that.

teams ahead of us are pretty bad and need starters or extra picks because they're gonna need players (cap issues). Philly/lions fall in that category....every draft the media/fans prop up the QB prospects and every yr a couple of them drop further than we expect.

SF can afford to take a QB and let him sit for a yr if they have too. I also feel like CAR is all in on getting Watson, their owner is obsessed with getting a elite QB to make them somewhat relevant. He can play the waiting game, Ruhle has a 7 yr contract (and it's the owner making this decision).

so Imo I think it's silly to say they have no chance at getting him.

Originally posted by NYniner85:

Originally posted by mayo49:
Why?

I mean what's a massive trade up? I don't see moving to say 7 as a massive trade up...I don't see Lance going any sooner than that.

teams ahead of us are pretty bad and need starters or extra picks because they're gonna need players (cap issues). Philly/lions fall in that category....every draft the media/fans prop up the QB prospects and every yr a couple of them drop further than we expect.

SF can afford to take a QB and let him sit for a yr if they have too. I also feel like CAR is all in on getting Watson, their owner is obsessed with getting a elite QB to make them somewhat relevant. He can play the waiting game, Ruhle has a 7 yr contract (and it's the owner making this decision).

so Imo I think it's silly to say they have no chance at getting him.

It's a lot cheaper than a Watson trade. I think Lance goes in the 5-7 range, so your right, it's not a massive trade up.

Originally posted by mayo49:
It's a lot cheaper than a Watson trade. I think Lance goes in the 5-7 range, so your right, it's not a massive trade up.

Want in on the bet Mayo?!

There are too many risk factors for most NFL teams, the earliest I could imagine is 8 to the Panthers as they do things differently, but I believe they're sold on Jones, plus they should pick Pitts.

Originally posted by 49erBigMac:

Originally posted by mayo49:
It's a lot cheaper than a Watson trade. I think Lance goes in the 5-7 range, so your right, it's not a massive trade up.

Want in on the bet Mayo?!

There are too many risk factors for most NFL teams, the earliest I could imagine is 8 to the Panthers as they do things differently, but I believe they're sold on Jones, plus they should pick Pitts.

I remember when people said Mahomes was gonna go in the 2nd round, lol good times.

Originally posted by 49erBigMac:

Originally posted by mayo49:
It's a lot cheaper than a Watson trade. I think Lance goes in the 5-7 range, so your right, it's not a massive trade up.

Want in on the bet Mayo?!

There are too many risk factors for most NFL teams, the earliest I could imagine is 8 to the Panthers as they do things differently, but I believe they're sold on Jones, plus they should pick Pitts.

In your scenario Pitts falls to us. I'd love to get Pitts, but most likely it's going to be a more pressing need.

Originally posted by AceDuce49:
I remember when people said Mahomes was gonna go in the 2nd round, lol good times.

I mean he went 10th overall to the ideal situation? It's kinda the same scenario where he shouldn't be a day 1 starter like Mahomes.

I remember when Rogers, big ben, Quinn etc all feel. I remember when top scouts had kizer as a top 2 QB (didn't go until 2nd rd).

point is no one truly knows lol.

Originally posted by mayo49:
In your scenario Pitts falls to us. I'd love to get Pitts, but most likely it's going to be a more pressing need.

I'd take Pitts over Jones in a heartbeat. I also think in that scenario they might try to move down.

I guess FA will determine a lot.

Originally posted by NYniner85:

Originally posted by AceDuce49:
I remember when people said Mahomes was gonna go in the 2nd round, lol good times.

I mean he went 10th overall to the ideal situation? It's kinda the same scenario where he shouldn't be a day 1 starter like Mahomes.

I remember when Rogers, big ben, Quinn etc all feel. I remember when top scouts had kizer as a top 2 QB (didn't go until 2nd rd).

point is no one truly knows lol.

This is true

Originally posted by mayo49:
Lance is a fantasy, boys. Need a major trade up to get him.

They don't have a choice. Shanny has already messed it up once by not drafting Mahomes when we had the pick. There is just no more excuse. And the most critical thing is next year's QB draft class is supposed to be absolutely barren and arguably we will be drafting even lower too. So, if they don't pull the pin in this draft, there will be no more foreseeable opportunities when all this while you could be wasting a ready-to-win roster.

Originally posted by NYniner85:
Disagree

Originally posted by NYniner85:
Disagree.

Wilson Lawrence and Lance will be the first 3 QB's off the board imo

Originally posted by Bellaleo:

Originally posted by NYniner85:
Disagree

Originally posted by NYniner85:
Disagree.

Wilson Lawrence and Lance will be the first 3 QB's off the board imo

Good, we take Fields and win Superbowls