There are 171 users in the forums
Originally posted by NCommand:
Justin Fields: 6-2 3/8 inches, 227 lbs., 4.44 40.
— Grant Cohn (@grantcohn) April 6, 2021
Robert Griffin III: 6-2 3/8 inches, 223 lbs., 4.41 40.
Originally posted by tjd808185:
Done deal now. Lawrence to Jags, Wilson to Jets, 49ers get Fields.
Originally posted by genus49:
Originally posted by frenchmov:
Done deal now. Lawrence to Jags, Wilson to Jets, 49ers get Fields.
Pls God let this be 🙏
Amen.
Originally posted by Jcool:
Interesting that Trevor Lawrence is seen as a generational QB and seemingly getting a pass on any flaws since he is going #1 and Justin Fields despite being just as talented and just as highly ranked since high school is getting nitpicked to death and could drop closer to 10 then 1.
Originally posted by flynhayn15:
Originally posted by NCommand:
Justin Fields: 6-2 3/8 inches, 227 lbs., 4.44 40.
— Grant Cohn (@grantcohn) April 6, 2021
Robert Griffin III: 6-2 3/8 inches, 223 lbs., 4.41 40.
I wonder what height, weight and speed, make you a precise passer who can diagnose defenses? What ever that is, I'm sure fields could lose weight and run slower to get there. Hopefully his height is not the dealbreaker!
Originally posted by Scratch:
As someone pointed out a few days ago, Juszczyk is now following Fields on twitter. He isn't following any other QB's from this class. Juice is one of Kyle's boys. We are taking Fields. Signed, sealed and delivered. You can take it to the betting window.
Originally posted by flynhayn15:
Originally posted by NCommand:
Justin Fields: 6-2 3/8 inches, 227 lbs., 4.44 40.
— Grant Cohn (@grantcohn) April 6, 2021
Robert Griffin III: 6-2 3/8 inches, 223 lbs., 4.41 40.
I wonder what height, weight and speed, make you a precise passer who can diagnose defenses? What ever that is, I'm sure fields could lose weight and run slower to get there. Hopefully his height is not the dealbreaker!
Originally posted by GhostOfBaalke:
Originally posted by Jcool:
Interesting that Trevor Lawrence is seen as a generational QB and seemingly getting a pass on any flaws since he is going #1 and Justin Fields despite being just as talented and just as highly ranked since high school is getting nitpicked to death and could drop closer to 10 then 1.
Because deep down they're attracted to him like a female.
good for us though. Get just as good of a prospect and better in many ways
Originally posted by DaBeegDeek:
I literally have not seen one breakdown of Lawrence by the TV a analysts. I've seen at least 10 on Fields and why he sucks, but I haven't seen a single summary of Lawrence and why hes so good.
Originally posted by Phoenix49ers:
Originally posted by DaBeegDeek:
I literally have not seen one breakdown of Lawrence by the TV a analysts. I've seen at least 10 on Fields and why he sucks, but I haven't seen a single summary of Lawrence and why hes so good.
He's been the #1 prospect for two years and hasn't done anything to convince people otherwise. He might not turn out to be the best NFL quarterback of the group but as a passer coming out of college, he's pretty well balanced overall.
Cosell did a nice breakdown of Lawrence:
Originally posted by DaBeegDeek:
I like Lawrence a lot. He's 1a for me next to Fields' 1b. My point being I've never seen anyone on TV break him down the way they have Fields, Jones, Wilson or Lance.
He's getting a pass because... well, just because.
Originally posted by 49erBigMac:
Originally posted by DaBeegDeek:
I like Lawrence a lot. He's 1a for me next to Fields' 1b. My point being I've never seen anyone on TV break him down the way they have Fields, Jones, Wilson or Lance.
He's getting a pass because... well, just because.
Some have started to question whether he's this generational prospect that he's been touted as.
They don't talk about him as it's so obvious that the Jags are taking him at #1, there's really no debate to be had.
I agree with you that Fields is closer to Lawrence than to #4, but Zach Wilson has made a very compelling case to be in the mix for #2.
I am surprised that it seems a done deal though, there should be a very strong debate going on.
Originally posted by DaBeegDeek:
Originally posted by 49erBigMac:
Originally posted by DaBeegDeek:
I like Lawrence a lot. He's 1a for me next to Fields' 1b. My point being I've never seen anyone on TV break him down the way they have Fields, Jones, Wilson or Lance.
He's getting a pass because... well, just because.
Some have started to question whether he's this generational prospect that he's been touted as.
They don't talk about him as it's so obvious that the Jags are taking him at #1, there's really no debate to be had.
I agree with you that Fields is closer to Lawrence than to #4, but Zach Wilson has made a very compelling case to be in the mix for #2.
I am surprised that it seems a done deal though, there should be a very strong debate going on.
People love Wilson because of the unique arm angles that he throws from and the varied platforms. It immediately invokes the likeness of Rodgers and Mahomes, but a lot needs to be addressed here. He is inconsistent, has a slight frame, s**t the bed against the best opposition, has had injuries to his throwing shoulder and his competition has been trash.
No question he has special talent, but he is by no means a cant miss prospect.
