QB Class 2021 | Page 32 | 49ers Webzone Forum

Mar 17, 2021 at 1:47 PM

krizay
Veteran
Posts: 25,208
NFL Pick 'em

Originally posted by Cisco0623:
Well the idea is if they DO like one of them, they need to move up to secure them. If not then, then obviously they will stay put. I think those 4 QB will go top ten tbh. Mac Jones I'm not so sure but def round 1.

But if they don't move up they will be crucified because the narrative continues to be pushed that they aren't willing to go get their guy. Despite moving up to get their guy damn near every draft

Mar 17, 2021 at 2:23 PM

#467

NYniner85
Veteran
Posts: 110,895

Originally posted by krizay:
But if they don't move up they will be crucified because the narrative continues to be pushed that they aren't willing to go get their guy. Despite moving up to get their guy damn near every draft

if those QBs turn into stars and Jimmy is just meh or gets hurt for the tenth time....they should be.

We're all niner fans, we don't have to defend everything they've done (or haven't done).

Mar 18, 2021 at 12:11 PM

#468

Heroism
Veteran
Posts: 23,818

49ers showed heavy interest in Andy Dalton and are now bringing in Joe Flacco. I still have a hard time believing Kyle is going to move away from his QB profile because all indications right now say he's not changing.

Mar 18, 2021 at 1:31 PM

#469

krizay
Veteran
Posts: 25,208
NFL Pick 'em

Originally posted by Heroism:
49ers showed heavy interest in Andy Dalton and are now bringing in Joe Flacco. I still have a hard time believing Kyle is going to move away from his QB profile because all indications right now say he's not changing.

I didn't want to be the one to say it.

Mar 18, 2021 at 1:35 PM

#470

Heroism
Veteran
Posts: 23,818

Originally posted by krizay:
I didn't want to be the one to say it.

Also, bringing in Flacco tells me they're committed to Jimmy because they're not going to roll into the season with Joe Flacco or a rookie as a starter.

It's not a good day for the people that want them to draft a QB, let alone trade up for one.

Mar 18, 2021 at 1:47 PM

#471

Cisco0623
Veteran
Posts: 12,590

Originally posted by Heroism:

Originally posted by krizay:
I didn't want to be the one to say it.

Also, bringing in Flacco tells me they're committed to Jimmy because they're not going to roll into the season with Joe Flacco or a rookie as a starter.

It's not a good day for the people that want them to draft a QB, let alone trade up for one.

I mean I'm not surprised. Would I love to see a trade up for a qb? yes, but its not their MO.

Mar 18, 2021 at 2:04 PM

#472

Rathof44
Veteran
Posts: 9,300

Originally posted by NYniner85:
I'm telling ya it makes sense

I think Colin's spot on with his take here. I've been feeling this way ever since the #49ers re-signed Williams to a massive contract (along with the other guys). pic.twitter.com/mndCaDCcMY
— Akash Anavarathan (@akashanav) March 17, 2021

Pretty much what you've been saying all along. Gotta look at financial side. Business decision.

[ Edited by Rathof44 on Mar 18, 2021 at 2:05 PM ]

Mar 18, 2021 at 3:00 PM

#473

genus49
Veteran
Posts: 23,337

Originally posted by Heroism:

Originally posted by krizay:
I didn't want to be the one to say it.

Also, bringing in Flacco tells me they're committed to Jimmy because they're not going to roll into the season with Joe Flacco or a rookie as a starter.

It's not a good day for the people that want them to draft a QB, let alone trade up for one.

Since when is Joe Flacco not mobile? The man is like a cannon armed gazelle out there.

Mar 18, 2021 at 3:21 PM

#474

Phoenix49ers
Moderator
Posts: 122,914

Originally posted by Cisco0623:
I mean I'm not surprised. Would I love to see a trade up for a qb? yes, but its not their MO.

Gotta have someone to trade up for too. Maybe they love Zach Wilson? But if the Jets are taking him no matter what, then should they move up for the next highest ranked QB just for the heck of it? Good front offices don't work that way.

Mar 18, 2021 at 3:39 PM

#475

Cisco0623
Veteran
Posts: 12,590

Originally posted by Phoenix49ers:

Originally posted by Cisco0623:
I mean I'm not surprised. Would I love to see a trade up for a qb? yes, but its not their MO.

Gotta have someone to trade up for too. Maybe they love Zach Wilson? But if the Jets are taking him no matter what, then should they move up for the next highest ranked QB just for the heck of it? Good front offices don't work that way.

Of course. A lot of us like fields and Lance as well, but no telling what Kyle likes. Either of them need a couple years to develop. Kyle's more likely to trade down than up lol

Mar 18, 2021 at 4:40 PM

#476

NYniner85
Veteran
Posts: 110,895

Originally posted by Heroism:

Originally posted by krizay:
I didn't want to be the one to say it.

Also, bringing in Flacco tells me they're committed to Jimmy because they're not going to roll into the season with Joe Flacco or a rookie as a starter.

It's not a good day for the people that want them to draft a QB, let alone trade up for one.

I don't think the plan was to move off Jimmy and start a rookie regardless.

also if Joe does it get sign, it's gonna be for like $1M which doesn't mean he's even on the roster come September.

Mar 19, 2021 at 4:28 AM

#477

Giedi
Veteran
Posts: 33,368

Originally posted by Heroism:
49ers showed heavy interest in Andy Dalton and are now bringing in Joe Flacco. I still have a hard time believing Kyle is going to move away from his QB profile because all indications right now say he's not changing.

Originally posted by Heroism:
Also, bringing in Flacco tells me they're committed to Jimmy because they're not going to roll into the season with Joe Flacco or a rookie as a starter.

It's not a good day for the people that want them to draft a QB, let alone trade up for one.

Those are good points. I'll just add maybe those meetings were set up prior to the Trent/Mack signing? Like if they didn't get Trent and Mack they'd be looking for veteran backup QB's to step in for Jimmy if he had rookie left tackle and a journeyman center, Flacco would be a guy that could step in for Jimmy for an extended period of time in Kyle's system. Since the got Mack and Trent, the just went ahead with the scheduled meeting anyway but didn't sign him because of getting Mack and Trent.

Mar 19, 2021 at 5:44 AM

#478

krizay
Veteran
Posts: 25,208
NFL Pick 'em

Originally posted by Giedi:
Those are good points. I'll just add maybe those meetings were set up prior to the Trent/Mack signing? Like if they didn't get Trent and Mack they'd be looking for veteran backup QB's to step in for Jimmy if he had rookie left tackle and a journeyman center, Flacco would be a guy that could step in for Jimmy for an extended period of time in Kyle's system. Since the got Mack and Trent, the just went ahead with the scheduled meeting anyway but didn't sign him because of getting Mack and Trent.

Or they didn't sign Dalton because he is getting 10 million and was told he was CHI's starter. Remains to be seen what happens with Flacco.

Mar 19, 2021 at 5:55 AM

#479

808niner4lyphe
Veteran
Posts: 7,610

Originally posted by Heroism:
49ers showed heavy interest in Andy Dalton and are now bringing in Joe Flacco. I still have a hard time believing Kyle is going to move away from his QB profile because all indications right now say he's not changing.

This.

Mar 19, 2021 at 6:32 AM

#480

All22
Veteran
Posts: 2,625

Originally posted by Rathof44:

Originally posted by NYniner85:
I'm telling ya it makes sense

I think Colin's spot on with his take here. I've been feeling this way ever since the #49ers re-signed Williams to a massive contract (along with the other guys). pic.twitter.com/mndCaDCcMY
— Akash Anavarathan (@akashanav) March 17, 2021

Pretty much what you've been saying all along. Gotta look at financial side. Business decision.

Cowherd is spot on and he didn't even mention Warner's contract.