Originally posted by Murphys1:
Originally posted by Cisco0623:I agree with you about Fields for sure....but to think you can get Jones-like talent and intangibles in the mid rounds is not true. You can get a "Jones-type," but not Jones. He's more special than that. That said, I would have preferred Jones at 12, and Fields or Wilson at 3. Lance at 6-12. Always a risk to wait though. Jones in the top 10 is gaining steam.
Originally posted by CatchMaster80:
Jones would be a safe pick but they didn't need to move up tht much to get him. I'm afraid if they pass on Lance or Fields that peopel on this board will be complaining 2 year from now that they passed up their chance to get a franchise QB. A real difference maker.
I'm not saying that I know for sure that Lance or Fields will be great but they have way more upside than Jones. In my mind, Jones would be just a younger, cheaper JG.
I hear you. I understand every opinion. For me it's simple. Jones is a solid QB. He's a healthy and younger Jimmy. That's not a bad thing, but you can get a Jones type in middle rounds even.
Give me Fields who can do everything Jones does and then he can do everything Jones cannot because you cannot coach arm talent and athleticism etc.
I always thought the other four qb would go top 5 which would automatically increase Jones value and someone would jump up to get him and be done with it.
He's a good prospect and if you have a solid roster he makes sense. But we gave up two first rounders now to get to three and imo that's not Jones. Certainly not with Fields and Lance there.
I still think many prospects are like Jones, but from smaller programs. We could argue Jones has an all star cast around him so how will that translate to the NFL etc.