Dylan Parham G/C Memphis

I keep doing mocks and coming away with Parham end of the 2nd (or small trade down). He's very intriguing and a great scheme fit imo.

former TE that's played all over the OL. He's athletic enough to pull, work in space, and get to the next level…he's got good length and could battle for that RG spot right off the bat.

His big question coming into the Senior Bowl was size. He came in at 311lbs and maintained it through the combine. He's got good hips and bend in his knees to get underneath defensive lineman. He's gotta get stronger and more snaps at center but there's some upside.

Overall I think he's a solid prospect and I wouldn't hate to hear his name called on day 2.

got some pretty darn good IOL prospects in this draft that just need some seasoning.

Originally posted by NYniner85:
I keep doing mocks and coming away with Parham end of the 2nd (or small trade down). He's very intriguing and a great scheme fit imo.

former TE that's played all over the OL. He's athletic enough to pull, work in space, and get to the next level…he's got good length and could battle for that RG spot right off the bat.

His big question coming into the Senior Bowl was size. He came in at 311lbs and maintained it through the combine. He's got good hips and bend in his knees to get underneath defensive lineman. He's gotta get stronger and more snaps at center but there's some upside.

Overall I think he's a solid prospect and I wouldn't hate to hear his name called on day 2.

got some pretty darn good IOL prospects in this draft that just need some seasoning.

Parham is a solid option. On a purely measurables perspective, I compared Parham, Jurgens and Zach Tom.

Parham comes in behind those other two in every category, but I think the 9ers could get Jurgens in the 3rd, and Tom in the 4th (or later).

I dont watch a lot of college ball, and YouTube highlights can be deceiving. I'm curious how are film experts rank these three?

Originally posted by Butter:
Parham is a solid option. On a purely measurables perspective, I compared Parham, Jurgens and Zach Tom.

Parham comes in behind those other two in every category, but I think the 9ers could get Jurgens in the 3rd, and Tom in the 4th (or later).

I dont watch a lot of college ball, and YouTube highlights can be deceiving. I'm curious how are film experts rank these three?

Most have Parham much higher than Tom and ahead of Jurgens. I haven't watch Tom and I'm a big fan of Jurgens as well.

I really love him if 49ers get the chance to take him at 61st overall pick but his performance on Senior Bowl and Combine has upgraded his stock and I really doubt he falls after 60th overall pick specially since he can play many positions at LOS. The only way is trading up for him.

He has been my pick at #61 for a while now. I'm cool with plenty of others too but I think he can be the C of the future. The weight thing is funny to me as I have read it too. Alex Mack weighs 311. Go figure.

Originally posted by NYniner85:

Originally posted by Butter:
Parham is a solid option. On a purely measurables perspective, I compared Parham, Jurgens and Zach Tom.

Parham comes in behind those other two in every category, but I think the 9ers could get Jurgens in the 3rd, and Tom in the 4th (or later).

I dont watch a lot of college ball, and YouTube highlights can be deceiving. I'm curious how are film experts rank these three?

Most have Parham much higher than Tom and ahead of Jurgens. I haven't watch Tom and I'm a big fan of Jurgens as well.

I actually had Parham mocked in the third once the 49ers got a second and third for Jimmy from the Colts. Ahhh, good times that was fun while it lasted. Since Jimmy is around, i gave up. lol.

Where does Kinnard go? I see him from late R1 to early R3.