There are 272 users in the forums

If Deebo gets traded for pick #10 who should Niners take?

Deebo isn't going anywhere and if we end up trading him we better get more than just 10. But pretending that happens I would trade down and collect more picks in this draft.
I don't think a deal gets done for just the #10 pick...there'd have to be either pick 35 or 38 along with it. If that happens, I'd say there's a good chance Lynch trades down from #10 to get either Burks or Christian Watson. The top C, Linderbaum could also be a good target.
Originally posted by BamaNiner:
Originally posted by mitpdub:
It Lynch does trade Deebo I don't see a trade down as others suggest.

Lynch in my opinion would need an immediate impact, or else he will get the DBuck trade flashbacks, but magnified. Too many impatient fans will call for his head if he drafts another Kinlaw potential project.

If Deebo is traded this team is t a contender anymore. At that point, you draft for long term potential.

Then John better get that announcing job back because this fan base won't be that patient even with a 2nd year QB.
BPA !!

That's the best way to do it... if you don't see it that way, then trade down and gain more picks..
Jerry Rice.
Malik Willis

go with the tri-QB offense. Playing chess not checkers

and then trade Willis for another 1st. And then use that first on a qb
Originally posted by ninersrule4:
Deebo isn't going anywhere and if we end up trading him we better get more than just 10. But pretending that happens I would trade down and collect more picks in this draft.

NO!!!

I have zero idea why people keep advocating this. Makes ZERO sense.
Originally posted by Jakemall:
Jerry Rice.



Jimmy Garropolo

/thread
Originally posted by evil:
Originally posted by btthepunk:
Mims is trash and could probably be signed after cut downs.

Bruh this is the WZ where our fans live to demand we sign every WR who is over 6'2 runs a sub 4.4 and busts with the team that draft him.

Some things never change.

Al Davis syndrome.
Trade down
Originally posted by SlowDownBoy:
Trade down

Why do so many people keep advocating this? Where is the logic?
Originally posted by SteveWallacesHelmet:
Originally posted by SlowDownBoy:
Trade down

Why do so many people keep advocating this? Where is the logic?

I don't get it. We don't have room on the roster for more picks. If Deebo is traded, we need an impact player to replace him. BPA.
Originally posted by dj43:
Originally posted by SteveWallacesHelmet:
Originally posted by SlowDownBoy:
Trade down

Why do so many people keep advocating this? Where is the logic?

I don't get it. We don't have room on the roster for more picks. If Deebo is traded, we need an impact player to replace him. BPA.

II believe in the Walsh philosophy School of drafting

Quality and quantity

Not to mention keep in mind they can finesse some of those pics to trade away 4 draft picks in the future.

Long-term success over short-term gratification
Originally posted by dj43:
Originally posted by SteveWallacesHelmet:
Originally posted by SlowDownBoy:
Trade down

Why do so many people keep advocating this? Where is the logic?

I don't get it. We don't have room on the roster for more picks. If Deebo is traded, we need an impact player to replace him. BPA.

I'm beginning to agree that we should keep 10 if we got that from the Jets.

But… if we don't and our first pick is 61 I think we should trade down while also getting rid of our lower round picks for multiple 2nds and high 3rd rounders.

I've done about 100 draft sims and IMO my drafts always look better when I trade down or trade up from 61.

Basically… we should be trying to move up multiple times in the later rounds.
if one of the 3 tackles are there - take one of them

if not, trade back

if the 3 tackles are gone and we can't trade back?
take Jordan Davis
Share 49ersWebzone