🏈 2023 NFL ENTRY DRAFT 🏈 | Page 42

Apr 27, 2023 at 7:56 PM

#616

rockzz
Veteran
Posts: 825

4 WR in a row

Apr 27, 2023 at 7:56 PM

#617

49erFaithful6
Veteran
Posts: 35,652

lol.. Kirko Chainz approves

Apr 27, 2023 at 7:57 PM

#618

tankle104
Veteran
Posts: 22,812

No more NFCW picks in the first left.

Apr 27, 2023 at 7:57 PM

#619

Rathof44
Veteran
Posts: 9,332

Originally posted by Fresno49er:

Originally posted by glorydayz:

Originally posted by Fresno49er:

Originally posted by KiwiM3:
49ers ain't taking Haener.

YES THEY ARE!

Why not?

I don't know much about him, but why shouldn't they take him?

I'm glad to see this is a completely unbiased, non-homerism pick.

Apr 27, 2023 at 7:58 PM

#620

glorydayz
Veteran
Posts: 13,167

Originally posted by MinerForty-Niner:

Originally posted by glorydayz:
How many games has McCafrey, Kinlaw, Bosa, all missed over the last few years?

Trey hasn't even gotten started.

If Trey is a bust, someone should be fired = Head Coach or GM.

3 first rounders and a third?? That should be a fireable offense no?

2 first rounders. They 2021 cancel out. Yes they overpaid by giving up a 1 in this draft for Lance. U wanting someone fired tells me you have an axe to grind with Shanahan or Lynch. Maybe TL just isn't very good?

The texans didn't cancel out a first today for the same trade up from 12.

This is how I see it, we lost the first round pick we used to pick Trey, then the other two we traded away plus the third we traded away. Thats three 1st round picks and a rrd that we invested. This would be a fireable offense if he turns out to be a bust.

Apr 27, 2023 at 7:58 PM

#621

KiwiM3
Veteran
Posts: 742

Originally posted by glorydayz:
Why not?

I don't know much about him, but why shouldn't they take him?

It's more I think he'll be gone before 49ers think about QB.

Apr 27, 2023 at 7:58 PM

#622

JTB1974
Veteran
Posts: 14,328
NFL Pick 'em

Gianta trading up 1 spot.

Apr 27, 2023 at 7:58 PM

#623

tankle104
Veteran
Posts: 22,812

Originally posted by Rathof44:

Originally posted by Fresno49er:

Originally posted by glorydayz:

Originally posted by Fresno49er:

Originally posted by KiwiM3:
49ers ain't taking Haener.

YES THEY ARE!

Why not?

I don't know much about him, but why shouldn't they take him?

I'm glad to see this is a completely unbiased, non-homerism pick.

He seemed bothered by being compared to Purdy. So eff him.

seems to have some talent though, for sure. If we get him, then we get him. I'd take him over Levis. Lol

[ Edited by tankle104 on Apr 27, 2023 at 7:58 PM ]

Apr 27, 2023 at 7:58 PM

#624

Predator85
Veteran
Posts: 4,385

Originally posted by tankle104:
No more NFCW picks in the first left.

#29 our original pick still to watch

Apr 27, 2023 at 7:59 PM

#625

Fresno49er
Veteran
Posts: 3,381

Originally posted by Rathof44:

Originally posted by Fresno49er:

Originally posted by glorydayz:

Originally posted by Fresno49er:

Originally posted by KiwiM3:
49ers ain't taking Haener.

YES THEY ARE!

Why not?

I don't know much about him, but why shouldn't they take him?

I'm glad to see this is a completely unbiased, non-homerism pick.

Agreed completely unbiased, non-homerism pick

Apr 27, 2023 at 7:59 PM

#626

glorydayz
Veteran
Posts: 13,167

Originally posted by tankle104:

Originally posted by Rathof44:

Originally posted by Fresno49er:

Originally posted by glorydayz:

Originally posted by Fresno49er:

Originally posted by KiwiM3:
49ers ain't taking Haener.

YES THEY ARE!

Why not?

I don't know much about him, but why shouldn't they take him?

I'm glad to see this is a completely unbiased, non-homerism pick.

He seemed bothered by being compared to Purdy. So eff him.

seems to have some talent though, for sure. If we get him, then we get him. I'd take him over Levis. Lol