There are 250 users in the forums

Kenneth Grant-DT-Michigan

Originally posted by Ezekiel38:
Good we need them all - starter quality talent and depth for rotation. West is a good penetrator and disruptor so think he is slightly different to grant/caldwell.

We have nobody good on the DL. Sub in your boy TJ Sanders for Alexander and grab Patrick Jenkins from Tulane and you also have 2 DL 3 techs.

Would not be mad with 5 DL in this draft as long as they're the good ones.

Mocks are fun - I might like that one ^ the best as our D would be top 5 guaranteed under Saleh.

Leonard Floyd, Maliek Collins, Yetur Gross Matos and Jordan Elliot are all in the last year of their deals. If we even keep them around this year. Floyd is the only guy who should be kept IMO.

This is the perfect draft to get 3 or 4 young impact guys on the DLine.
[ Edited by Sask49erFan on Mar 8, 2025 at 8:55 AM ]
  • pd24
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 9,268
I would draft him at 11
  • BP13
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 5,981
Originally posted by pd24:
I would draft him at 11

same here, the more I watch the more I like this dude.
Originally posted by pd24:
I would draft him at 11
That would be a major reach.
Originally posted by DaleGribble:
Originally posted by pd24:
I would draft him at 11
That would be a major reach.

So we should all be getting prepared for him to be the pick. Waaaaaay more often than not, I think they reach with their picks and I'm oftentimes thinking that they could have got that player an entire round or two later lol
Originally posted by BP13:
Originally posted by pd24:
I would draft him at 11

same here, the more I watch the more I like this dude.

I'm with you guys, humans that big should not move like he does. Do you think the Giants are upset they drafted Dexter Lawrence? In this age of light boxes a guy like that is worth his considerable weight in gold if he can move as well. Checks every box for me.

I've been watching Mason Graham, and I've been just as impressed by Grant. Mason is the better technician but Grant is a freak. I think Grant may be the harder to find prospect.
  • Kolohe
  • Hall of Fame
  • Posts: 64,064
I rather just sign Dalvin Tomlinson, who has played in a wide 9 and is a solid run stopper. I wouldn't spend the 11th pick on Grant.
Originally posted by Kolohe:
I rather just sign Dalvin Tomlinson, who has played in a wide 9 and is a solid run stopper. I wouldn't spend the 11th pick on Grant.

Same
Originally posted by Kolohe:
I rather just sign Dalvin Tomlinson, who has played in a wide 9 and is a solid run stopper. I wouldn't spend the 11th pick on Grant.

This is the new world, we won't sign bonafide starters in Free Agency, only fringe players, got to draft and develop now we've got an expensive QB.
  • Kolohe
  • Hall of Fame
  • Posts: 64,064
Originally posted by 49erBigMac:
Originally posted by Kolohe:
I rather just sign Dalvin Tomlinson, who has played in a wide 9 and is a solid run stopper. I wouldn't spend the 11th pick on Grant.

This is the new world, we won't sign bonafide starters in Free Agency, only fringe players, got to draft and develop now we've got an expensive QB.

But the new world shouldn't include taking Grant with the 11th pick. Honestly I'd take Walter Nolen before Grant.
At the moment Grant is a run stopping DT that needs developing to be an effective pass rusher. There is potential with him of course but potential gets coaches fired all the time. We need a bona-fide stud at #11. If the team is high on him i sure hope they can trade down and pick him. He's not worth pick 11 IMO
Originally posted by 49ers808:
Originally posted by DaleGribble:
Originally posted by pd24:
I would draft him at 11
That would be a major reach.

So we should all be getting prepared for him to be the pick. Waaaaaay more often than not, I think they reach with their picks and I'm oftentimes thinking that they could have got that player an entire round or two later lol
Lol probably so,I always expect a head scratcher early it softens the blow.
Originally posted by Kolohe:
Originally posted by 49erBigMac:
Originally posted by Kolohe:
I rather just sign Dalvin Tomlinson, who has played in a wide 9 and is a solid run stopper. I wouldn't spend the 11th pick on Grant.

This is the new world, we won't sign bonafide starters in Free Agency, only fringe players, got to draft and develop now we've got an expensive QB.

But the new world shouldn't include taking Grant with the 11th pick. Honestly I'd take Walter Nolen before Grant.
Exactly all the more reason not to reach especially early.
Originally posted by miked1978:
At the moment Grant is a run stopping DT that needs developing to be an effective pass rusher. There is potential with him of course but potential gets coaches fired all the time. We need a bona-fide stud at #11. If the team is high on him i sure hope they can trade down and pick him. He's not worth pick 11 IMO

He did have 23 pressures last year which seems pretty good but he also had Graham next to him taking most of the attention. What little I saw it was a lot of 1 on 1 and he uses the same swim move over and over would like to see more bull rush. I'd rather try and get Marks, DE, or OT
Originally posted by 49erBigMac:
Originally posted by BP13:
Originally posted by pd24:
I would draft him at 11

same here, the more I watch the more I like this dude.

I'm with you guys, humans that big should not move like he does. Do you think the Giants are upset they drafted Dexter Lawrence? In this age of light boxes a guy like that is worth his considerable weight in gold if he can move as well. Checks every box for me.

I've been watching Mason Graham, and I've been just as impressed by Grant. Mason is the better technician but Grant is a freak. I think Grant may be the harder to find prospect.

When you watch the Graham tape Grant is the one fighting through double teams. And still making plays
Theme: Auto • LightDark
ChatSearch Share 49ersWebzone