that would be awesome.
There are 249 users in the forums
The Official Las Vegas Raiders Thread
Apr 20, 2010 at 10:56 PM
- HessianDud
- Veteran
- Posts: 22,995
that would be awesome.
Apr 20, 2010 at 11:00 PM
- pelos21
- Veteran
- Posts: 7,736
I love the Raiders.
Apr 20, 2010 at 11:12 PM
- DaFaro49ers
- Veteran
- Posts: 1,569
Originally posted by pelos21:
I love the Raiders.
hahahahaha
Apr 20, 2010 at 11:54 PM
- blunt_probe
- Veteran
- Posts: 20,849
Even if they do this, it's still not remotely as bad as selecting DHB over Crabtree. I can just rewatch that clip all day. 
Apr 21, 2010 at 12:04 AM
- StOnEy333
- Hall of Fame
- Posts: 99,663
- NFL Pick 'em
Originally posted by blunt_probe:
Even if they do this, it's still not remotely as bad as selecting DHB over Crabtree. I can just rewatch that clip all day.
Yeah, pretty much.
Ooo, what about Shank-a-kowski? Was a kicker in the first round worse than DHB?
Apr 21, 2010 at 12:25 AM
- YungAce
- Veteran
- Posts: 46,915
if we're expecting to draft him at 17 and become a future pro-bowler at RG or RT, why can't oakland pick him at 8 if he's such a solid player?
Apr 21, 2010 at 12:27 AM
- DaFaro49ers
- Veteran
- Posts: 1,569
Originally posted by YuNGaCE:
if we're expecting to draft him at 17 and become a future pro-bowler at RG or RT, why can't oakland pick him at 8 if he's such a solid player?
Umm maybe because they can still get a possible all Pro Tackle, DT, LB, QB at that point. And the least important position on the entire team other than P,K, is Guard. who spends the 8th pick on a GUARD??????
Apr 21, 2010 at 12:31 AM
- blunt_probe
- Veteran
- Posts: 20,849
Originally posted by StOnEy333:Originally posted by blunt_probe:
Even if they do this, it's still not remotely as bad as selecting DHB over Crabtree. I can just rewatch that clip all day.
Yeah, pretty much.
Ooo, what about Shank-a-kowski? Was a kicker in the first round worse than DHB?
Well you can argue that Janikowski is more productive than DHB, but, yeah, selecting a kicker in round one is insane. Still, I think the DHB pick is way funnier, and our niners benefited directly because of it. I love Cris Carter's take on it.
Apr 21, 2010 at 12:39 AM
- YungAce
- Veteran
- Posts: 46,915
Originally posted by DaFaro49ers:Originally posted by YuNGaCE:
if we're expecting to draft him at 17 and become a future pro-bowler at RG or RT, why can't oakland pick him at 8 if he's such a solid player?
Umm maybe because they can still get a possible all Pro Tackle, DT, LB, QB at that point. And the least important position on the entire team other than P,K, is Guard. who spends the 8th pick on a GUARD??????
He's also an option at RT. You really don't know how everyone will pan out as a pro. He might be the best available tackle on the board as well.
Apr 21, 2010 at 12:40 AM
- StOnEy333
- Hall of Fame
- Posts: 99,663
- NFL Pick 'em
Originally posted by YuNGaCE:Originally posted by DaFaro49ers:Originally posted by YuNGaCE:
if we're expecting to draft him at 17 and become a future pro-bowler at RG or RT, why can't oakland pick him at 8 if he's such a solid player?
Umm maybe because they can still get a possible all Pro Tackle, DT, LB, QB at that point. And the least important position on the entire team other than P,K, is Guard. who spends the 8th pick on a GUARD??????
He's also an option at RT. You really don't know how everyone will pan out as a pro. He might be the best available tackle on the board as well.
Please explain to why you are defending the raiders and their sound football/business operations?
Apr 21, 2010 at 12:42 AM
- YungAce
- Veteran
- Posts: 46,915
Originally posted by StOnEy333:Originally posted by YuNGaCE:Originally posted by DaFaro49ers:Originally posted by YuNGaCE:
if we're expecting to draft him at 17 and become a future pro-bowler at RG or RT, why can't oakland pick him at 8 if he's such a solid player?
Umm maybe because they can still get a possible all Pro Tackle, DT, LB, QB at that point. And the least important position on the entire team other than P,K, is Guard. who spends the 8th pick on a GUARD??????
He's also an option at RT. You really don't know how everyone will pan out as a pro. He might be the best available tackle on the board as well.
Please explain to why you are defending the raiders and their sound football/business operations?
Raiders are retarded, I'm defending Iupati.
Apr 21, 2010 at 1:31 AM
- DaFaro49ers
- Veteran
- Posts: 1,569
Originally posted by StOnEy333:Originally posted by YuNGaCE:Originally posted by DaFaro49ers:Originally posted by YuNGaCE:
if we're expecting to draft him at 17 and become a future pro-bowler at RG or RT, why can't oakland pick him at 8 if he's such a solid player?
Umm maybe because they can still get a possible all Pro Tackle, DT, LB, QB at that point. And the least important position on the entire team other than P,K, is Guard. who spends the 8th pick on a GUARD??????
He's also an option at RT. You really don't know how everyone will pan out as a pro. He might be the best available tackle on the board as well.
Please explain to why you are defending the raiders and their sound football/business operations?
Thanks youu
Apr 21, 2010 at 1:45 AM
- English
- Moderator
- Posts: 40,404
- NFL Pick 'em
I wanted Iupati with our 17th pick. If he goes that early you can't really argue with it, and it will force down a top player to our first pick.
But you can't help wondering whether Al is playing back to the media. "Hey who's the least likely person for me to take with the 8th overall? Punter? No, I know, a guard."
Could happen, though. Al is convinced he knows best.
But you can't help wondering whether Al is playing back to the media. "Hey who's the least likely person for me to take with the 8th overall? Punter? No, I know, a guard."
Could happen, though. Al is convinced he knows best.
Apr 21, 2010 at 1:57 AM
- WillistheWall
- Veteran
- Posts: 22,848
I hope they do it.
Apr 21, 2010 at 2:56 AM
- Snider8706
- Veteran
- Posts: 3,373
Im guessing they'll take Taylor mays with they're first round pick. Which will also drop a better player down a slot.