Wow... Patriots just keep getting everything in their favor. Raiders agreed to send DE Burgess for an undisclosed draft pick.
I wonder what round pick they gave..
Here's the link...
http://wap.nfl.com/site?t=2zBe9N5wvuvszuOKpkmr5w&sid=nfl2
...sorry if link didn't work. I'm posting from my phone. Its on the front page of nfl.com
There are 293 users in the forums
Patriots make a trade with Raiders!
- 1 2
Aug 7, 2009 at 1:55 AM
- Eli_23
- Veteran
- Posts: 5,682
Aug 7, 2009 at 6:49 AM
- evil
- Veteran
- Posts: 46,086
- NFL Pick 'em
Reportedly it's a 3 and a 4 however if the Pats acquire a 5 (they have no 5th round picks currently) then it will be a 3 and a 5.
Philly supposedly was offering a 3 and a player.
Philly supposedly was offering a 3 and a player.
Aug 7, 2009 at 9:06 AM
- mcbaes72
- Veteran
- Posts: 9,679
Yeah, good pick up for the Patriots. Geez, go to Oakland and become frustrated, then go to NE and watch your career stats improve dramatically! It worked for Moss.
Aug 7, 2009 at 9:24 AM
- bayarealuv
- Veteran
- Posts: 57,209
patriots make the superbowl this year.. just my guess.. i wonder what their vegas odds are
Aug 7, 2009 at 9:47 AM
- lamontb
- Veteran
- Posts: 30,973
- NFL Pick 'em
Yea he was a good pick up
Aug 7, 2009 at 9:53 AM
- Overkill
- Moderator
- Posts: 11,150
- NFL Pick 'em
I assume he's gonna play OLB for them? Or maybe just play DE on passing downs?
I have a feeling this puts Tully Banta Can't back on the street.
Sign him?
I have a feeling this puts Tully Banta Can't back on the street.
Sign him?
Aug 7, 2009 at 10:03 AM
- mcbaes72
- Veteran
- Posts: 9,679
Originally posted by Overkill:
I assume he's gonna play OLB for them? Or maybe just play DE on passing downs?
I have a feeling this puts Tully Banta Can't back on the street.
Sign him?
I almost forgot that they re-signed TBC. I guess he'll be a roster cut or if he makes it, ST only...haha.
Aug 7, 2009 at 10:18 AM
- fzrdave
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,168
And the Patriots get better again for not much cost.
Aug 7, 2009 at 12:04 PM
- 49erman5692
- Member
- Posts: 4,657
wow AL Davis fail, I remember when They traded a 4th for Moss
Aug 7, 2009 at 12:58 PM
- blizzuntz
- Veteran
- Posts: 49,823
Raiders commitment to excrement
Aug 7, 2009 at 1:20 PM
- Joecool
- Veteran
- Posts: 70,984
When NE needs LBs, they get them. When we need LBs....
Aug 7, 2009 at 1:28 PM
- Kolohe
- Hall of Fame
- Posts: 62,017
Originally posted by Joecool:
When NE needs LBs, they get them. When we need LBs....
Exactly!!!
But when was the last time the Raiders traded with the 9ers??
Aug 7, 2009 at 1:37 PM
- TheFunkyChicken
- Veteran
- Posts: 4,240
Why didn't we make that trade. Seriously, that would be a major addition to the team. Haralso, Burgess, Lawson, and Brooks as our OLBs. I'd be real happy with that.
Aug 7, 2009 at 4:24 PM
- AXEGRINDER
- Veteran
- Posts: 25,671
Originally posted by 49erman5692:
wow AL Davis fail, I remember when They traded a 4th for Moss
Tell me you're not surprised. Damn Al Davis is the NFL's biggest flippin' moron. Join the asylum already douchebag Al.
Look at it in a positive light, at least the Raiders are guaranteed to suck as long as he is around to give away players for draft picks he may never see come to fruition.
Aug 8, 2009 at 10:51 AM
- evil
- Veteran
- Posts: 46,086
- NFL Pick 'em
The Raiders trade a 31 year old player who is no longer in his prime and has never played in a 3-4 in the NFL for a 3rd and a 4th or 5th rounder and it's a fail ?
The guy did not want to be on this team anymore and they took what seemingly was the best offer on the table for a player who has missed 8 games the last 2 years and produced only 12 sacks in that time frame whereas his first 2 years with Oakland he had 27 sacks. Do you truly think they could have gotten any more for him ?
Once again people here hate on the Raiders just because when in fact the Raiders got excellent value in this deal regardless of whether Burgess resurrects his career with the Pats or not. Hate on me all you want for defending them but I call it like I see it.
The guy did not want to be on this team anymore and they took what seemingly was the best offer on the table for a player who has missed 8 games the last 2 years and produced only 12 sacks in that time frame whereas his first 2 years with Oakland he had 27 sacks. Do you truly think they could have gotten any more for him ?
Once again people here hate on the Raiders just because when in fact the Raiders got excellent value in this deal regardless of whether Burgess resurrects his career with the Pats or not. Hate on me all you want for defending them but I call it like I see it.
- 1 2