-
GEEK
- Veteran
-
- Posts: 19,259
In no particular order:
Tory Aikman
Terry Bradshaw
Tim Rattay
Ben Rothlesburger
Steve McNair (RIP)
Joe Namath
[ Edited by GEEK on Dec 28, 2009 at 11:02 AM ]
-
YungBird
- Veteran
-
- Posts: 21,475
Big Ben is not overrated to me
-
HaiGuise
- Veteran
-
- Posts: 17,874
Nice joke to put Tim Rattay on there. lol
-
krizay
- Veteran
-
- Posts: 25,478
Originally posted by BirdmanJr:
Big Ben is not overrated to me
-
pantstickle
- Hall of Fame
-
- Posts: 3,467
I completely agree with everyone on that list, especially Aikman.
Having the greatest (arguably) running back of all time on his team is why he won three Super Bowls, but nobody ever wants to give credit to offensive players that don't play QB.
Brad Johnson has better stats in almost every possible category. Better rating (82.5 to 81.6), better TD/INT ratio (166-122 to 165-141), and a better completion percentage (61.7 to 61.5).
Yeah, he was on a team that won 3 Super Bowls, but in only one was he a factor. Emmitt Smith won the second, and Neil O'Donnell lost the third.
Easily the most overrated quarterback ever.
Heck of a broadcaster though.
-
Ninerjohn
- Veteran
-
- Posts: 66,820
I think Joe Willie Namath has to top the list of quarterbacks who are perceived to have been all time greats but didnt quite measure up. Namath had a great arm and of course had SB 3 but just did not have the stats that would put him at that level.
-
Ninerjohn
- Veteran
-
- Posts: 66,820
Originally posted by GEEK:
In no particular order:
Tory Aikman
Terry Bradshaw
Tim Rattay
Ben Rothlesburger
Steve McNair (RIP)
Joe Namath
Namath Bradshaw YES overrated
Ben - hell NO. He is not overrated at all. I want him in any game coming down the stretch.
-
OKC49erFan
- Veteran
-
- Posts: 7,349
Originally posted by pantstickle:
I completely agree with everyone on that list, especially Aikman.
Having the greatest (arguably) running back of all time on his team is why he won three Super Bowls, but nobody ever wants to give credit to offensive players that don't play QB.
Brad Johnson has better stats in almost every possible category. Better rating (82.5 to 81.6), better TD/INT ratio (166-122 to 165-141), and a better completion percentage (61.7 to 61.5).
Yeah, he was on a team that won 3 Super Bowls, but in only one was he a factor. Emmitt Smith won the second, and Neil O'Donnell lost the third.
Easily the most overrated quarterback ever.
Heck of a broadcaster though.
Nope. It was that O-line they had. Monsters.
-
NineFourNiner
- Hall of Fame
-
- Posts: 71,966
In Niner Talk, it is whomever is sitting behind Alex Smith.
-
pantstickle
- Hall of Fame
-
- Posts: 3,467
Originally posted by NineFourNiner:
In Niner Talk, it is whomever is sitting behind Alex Smith.
Or whoever is behind him.
-
pantstickle
- Hall of Fame
-
- Posts: 3,467
Originally posted by OKC49erFan:
Originally posted by pantstickle:
I completely agree with everyone on that list, especially Aikman.
Having the greatest (arguably) running back of all time on his team is why he won three Super Bowls, but nobody ever wants to give credit to offensive players that don't play QB.
Brad Johnson has better stats in almost every possible category. Better rating (82.5 to 81.6), better TD/INT ratio (166-122 to 165-141), and a better completion percentage (61.7 to 61.5).
Yeah, he was on a team that won 3 Super Bowls, but in only one was he a factor. Emmitt Smith won the second, and Neil O'Donnell lost the third.
Easily the most overrated quarterback ever.
Heck of a broadcaster though.
Nope. It was that O-line they had. Monsters.
Well, that helped, too.
-
NineFourNiner
- Hall of Fame
-
- Posts: 71,966
Originally posted by pantstickle:
Originally posted by NineFourNiner:
In Niner Talk, it is whomever is sitting behind Alex Smith.
Or whoever is behind him.
that's what I meant.
I'm a
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/301bb/301bbe778a44cb6cd3ebb17dc14001cf31c37e3f" alt=""
today.
-
TX9R
- Veteran
-
- Posts: 8,351
Def Namath, had he not played in NY no one would know his name right now. Even the SB was won more by the defense than Namath. Basically it would be like if Trent Dilfer guaranteed a win for the Ravens in a game the defense won for him and got in the HOF, except Dilfer actually had better career numbers.
-
YungBird
- Veteran
-
- Posts: 21,475
Wow..I never bothered to look up Namath's stats but I always thought he was some great QB
Career Stats
TD-INT 173-220
Yards 27,663
QB Rating 65.5
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b377e/b377eac9532cad3936f552c352742f851cc7f659" alt=""
those stats look AWFUL..is it because of the era he played in or what?
[ Edited by BirdmanJr on Dec 28, 2009 at 11:55 AM ]
-
susweel
- Hall of Nepal
-
- Posts: 121,248
Brett Favre
He has choked many times in the playoffs and nobody ever says anything.