OFFICIAL Blaine Gabbert Thread

Originally posted by DonnieDarko:

Originally posted by okdkid:
FYI

Gabbert's 2009 game against Illinois is on ESPNU right now.

_____

wrong year.

Originally posted by okdkid:

Originally posted by DonnieDarko:

Originally posted by okdkid:
FYI

Gabbert's 2009 game against Illinois is on ESPNU right now.

_____

wrong year.

It's just funny that someone made a highlight of all his bad throws/decisions and put them together.

Originally posted by 49ersalldaway126:

Originally posted by 52isabeast:

Originally posted by 49ersalldaway126:

Originally posted by 52isabeast:
Drop all the Alex Smith 2.0 crap!!! This is ridiculous! This kid has a chance to be more of a Josh Freeman than Alex Smith! He played on a BAD Missouri team with no NFL talent at skill positions (similar to Matt Ryan coming out) and still led them to a great season.

He led them to a win over #1 Oklahoma and played in the BIG 12. To say that "Alex had better college #'s is an ignorant statement and is just not even trying to make a true comparison. He played at UTAH where his 2nd toughest opponent was the All Girl Mormon squad from 2 towns over! If you think: "Spread offense, white QB, wears #11 -- He's gotta be Alex!" than shame on you. Just take a minute to what everyone said when we interviewed Freeman 2 years ago (I think it's a much better comparison) and if we had a chance to do it over, he wouldn't have been available at #10.

If we take him and he works with Harbaugh (whom BTW I trust more than anyone on this board) he could see a Freeman/Ryan/Rodgers development and that is better than anything we've had in a long time. If he's there at #7 and Peterson is off the board, he should be the pick.

you do know that harbaugh wants alex back and not only has complimented him multiple times and has even offered alex a 1 year 3.5 mil contract beofre cba expired and also said that it will be avaiable after cba is i place

I do know that and I think that it's simply a matter of covering his backside against the lock out. In case there's no one else available for him, why wouldn't he want Alex to feel welcome and lead the team?

I also know he said he was "dazzled" at Gabbert's workout and I think at the end of the day the stats we saw out of Alex last year are probably going to be the best we get from him.

I've made all the excuses too (7 coordinators - 7 year) but there comes a point where a guy gets it done or he doesn't. Bradford got it done with a new offense this year (and AWFUL talent outside of SJax), as just one example. just because Alex can't get it done, doesn't mean that Gabbert is the same. Alex Smith/McNabb/Bulger/Palmer = stopgap; Gabbert = future.

noot to take aything away from bradford because he did amazing even considering the talent but what they did was genius they let bradford runa spread offense in stl so he didnt have to learn a new system


and i dont think we have seen the best from alex he has improved every year and has had 48 td and 38 int since his rookie year despite the fact that we had nolan and singeltary as our Hc(know nothing about qbs) and has had different oc every year and unstable tem (till about 2 years ago)

again alex has been a disspointment but the orgnization set alex in a position to fail from the start they didnt even give him a chance to suceed

I'm not arguing the points about Alex, but he's also just not gotten it done and WON games. Most of his stats are courtesy of garbage time yardage when team are playing zone and we're spreading it out and throwing to catch up. Look at the games previous season vs. Houston and Green Bay (not 2010).

BTW - I thought that Shurmur did teach Sam Bradford the WCO last year and that is what they ran, it did feature some more shotgun than traditional WCO but so does Green Bay's.

I just think that Alex is gone and is fractured mentally beyond repair in SF. Talent wise I don't see him as an equal to Kolb and hope we don't fall for the banana in the tailpipe and trade for KK. If Gabbert is there and Peterson isn't, he's BPA/fit for our needs and should be the pick in my opinion. He has the ability to lead this team, for the future.

Bottom line, he's just too risky at 7. We need a solid, impact player at 7. The draft is a crapshoot, but we need to hedge our bets. We need secondary help BADLY from this year and there just happens to be two highly-rated, impeccable players available in this area of need. Peterson loves us (supposedly), but will likely be gone. Hence, Prince is the choice. Drafting a pass-rusher wouldn't be terrible, either. But, please God, no Gabbert or Newton...

Shanghai'D

Originally posted by DShanghai69er:
Bottom line, he's just too risky at 7. We need a solid, impact player at 7. The draft is a crapshoot, but we need to hedge our bets. We need secondary help BADLY from this year and there just happens to be two highly-rated, impeccable players available in this area of need. Peterson loves us (supposedly), but will likely be gone. Hence, Prince is the choice. Drafting a pass-rusher wouldn't be terrible, either. But, please God, no Gabbert or Newton...

Shanghai'D

Newton will be gone after the first pick so you won't have to worry about him. I'm with you on No Gabbert though. QB in the second or 3rd round is fine with me.

Missouri scored 28 rushing touchdowns(5 from Gabbert) in the redzone last year which accounts for Gabbert's low touchdown numbers.

Id rather take: Peterson, Prince or Quinn.. Heck even Aj Green if Availible.

Why draft a quarterback number 7 overall, who will not be ready to start until 1-2yrs!? We still would have to aquire a qb. If I was GM and we had the 7th pick, id draft a player with instant impact to win a division that is very winnable. Peterson may go number 5 to Arizona.... just alone with that Pick Arizona will win 1-2 more games. We need that kind of impact, can Gabbert get us to 8 wins this season? NOPE.

If Gabbert is there at 7: Id either get Quinn if there or trade back with Washington who will want to get Gabbert. Than at pick number 10 trade back with the Eagles for pick number 23 and an extra 2nd round pick(or draft Prince at 10). At 23 we take Jimmy Smith.. With our 2 2nd round picks we take Brooks Reed and Coln Kaepernick(or best qb availible)

[ Edited by DaFaro49ers on Apr 28, 2011 at 00:22:59 ]

Originally posted by DaFaro49ers:
Id rather take: Peterson, Prince or Quinn.. Heck even Aj Green if Availible.

Why draft a quarterback number 7 overall, who will not be ready to start until 1-2yrs!? We still would have to aquire a qb. If I was GM and we had the 7th pick, id draft a player with instant impact to win a division that is very winnable. Peterson may go number 5 to Arizona.... just alone with that Pick Arizona will win 1-2 more games. We need that kind of impact, can Gabber get us to 8 wins this season? NOPE.

Did you really need to make another thread about Gabbert.... When thier like 3 other threads you could of made your rant on?

Originally posted by fakers23:

Originally posted by DaFaro49ers:
Id rather take: Peterson, Prince or Quinn.. Heck even Aj Green if Availible.

Why draft a quarterback number 7 overall, who will not be ready to start until 1-2yrs!? We still would have to aquire a qb. If I was GM and we had the 7th pick, id draft a player with instant impact to win a division that is very winnable. Peterson may go number 5 to Arizona.... just alone with that Pick Arizona will win 1-2 more games. We need that kind of impact, can Gabber get us to 8 wins this season? NOPE.

Did you really need to make another thread about Gabbert.... When thier like 3 other threads you could of made your rant on?

those are bandwagon threads! It is becoming even more clear that this will occur, so I felt it was worthy of indepth discussion of him being selected at 7. Would you be happy?

Originally posted by DaFaro49ers:

Originally posted by fakers23:

Originally posted by DaFaro49ers:
Id rather take: Peterson, Prince or Quinn.. Heck even Aj Green if Availible.

Why draft a quarterback number 7 overall, who will not be ready to start until 1-2yrs!? We still would have to aquire a qb. If I was GM and we had the 7th pick, id draft a player with instant impact to win a division that is very winnable. Peterson may go number 5 to Arizona.... just alone with that Pick Arizona will win 1-2 more games. We need that kind of impact, can Gabber get us to 8 wins this season? NOPE.

Did you really need to make another thread about Gabbert.... When thier like 3 other threads you could of made your rant on?

those are bandwagon threads! It is becoming even more clear that this will occur, so I felt it was worthy of indepth discussion of him being selected at 7. Would you be happy?

HUH? I didn't know everyone in draft rumors and news is a Gabbert fans.. Did you go and check every member. lmao

[ Edited by fakers23 on Apr 28, 2011 at 00:27:36 ]

Originally posted by fakers23:

Originally posted by DaFaro49ers:

Originally posted by fakers23:

Originally posted by DaFaro49ers:
Id rather take: Peterson, Prince or Quinn.. Heck even Aj Green if Availible.

Why draft a quarterback number 7 overall, who will not be ready to start until 1-2yrs!? We still would have to aquire a qb. If I was GM and we had the 7th pick, id draft a player with instant impact to win a division that is very winnable. Peterson may go number 5 to Arizona.... just alone with that Pick Arizona will win 1-2 more games. We need that kind of impact, can Gabber get us to 8 wins this season? NOPE.

Did you really need to make another thread about Gabbert.... When thier like 3 other threads you could of made your rant on?

those are bandwagon threads! It is becoming even more clear that this will occur, so I felt it was worthy of indepth discussion of him being selected at 7. Would you be happy?

HUH? I didn't know everyone in draft rumors and news is a Gabbert fans.. Did you go and check every member. lmao

I never said they all were? did you read it correctly!? I said the thread is a "Blaine Gabbert Bandwagon" thread. Not an official BLAINE GABBERT AT PICK 7 thread

Originally posted by DaFaro49ers:

Originally posted by fakers23:

Originally posted by DaFaro49ers:

Originally posted by fakers23:

Originally posted by DaFaro49ers:
Id rather take: Peterson, Prince or Quinn.. Heck even Aj Green if Availible.

Why draft a quarterback number 7 overall, who will not be ready to start until 1-2yrs!? We still would have to aquire a qb. If I was GM and we had the 7th pick, id draft a player with instant impact to win a division that is very winnable. Peterson may go number 5 to Arizona.... just alone with that Pick Arizona will win 1-2 more games. We need that kind of impact, can Gabber get us to 8 wins this season? NOPE.

Did you really need to make another thread about Gabbert.... When thier like 3 other threads you could of made your rant on?

those are bandwagon threads! It is becoming even more clear that this will occur, so I felt it was worthy of indepth discussion of him being selected at 7. Would you be happy?

HUH? I didn't know everyone in draft rumors and news is a Gabbert fans.. Did you go and check every member. lmao

I never said they all were? did you read it correctly!? I said the thread is a "Blaine Gabbert Bandwagon" thread. Not an official BLAINE GABBERT AT PICK 7 thread

Dude not everyone in the Gabbert thread are Gabberrt fans.. You are labeling everyone just because you have disdain for the guy.. I don't like Gabbert myself,but you don't see me starting another thread.. When thier are like 2 to 3 other threads I can discuss this in..

P.S. You did label those threads as Bandwagon threads... Your excat words down below...

Originally posted by DaFaro49ers:

Originally posted by fakers23:

Originally posted by DaFaro49ers:
Id rather take: Peterson, Prince or Quinn.. Heck even Aj Green if Availible.

Why draft a quarterback number 7 overall, who will not be ready to start until 1-2yrs!? We still would have to aquire a qb. If I was GM and we had the 7th pick, id draft a player with instant impact to win a division that is very winnable. Peterson may go number 5 to Arizona.... just alone with that Pick Arizona will win 1-2 more games. We need that kind of impact, can Gabber get us to 8 wins this season? NOPE.

Did you really need to make another thread about Gabbert.... When thier like 3 other threads you could of made your rant on?

those are bandwagon threads! It is becoming even more clear that this will occur, so I felt it was worthy of indepth discussion of him being selected at 7. Would you be happy?

[ Edited by fakers23 on Apr 28, 2011 at 00:32:55 ]

Originally posted by fakers23:

Originally posted by DaFaro49ers:

Originally posted by fakers23:

Originally posted by DaFaro49ers:

Originally posted by fakers23:

Originally posted by DaFaro49ers:
Id rather take: Peterson, Prince or Quinn.. Heck even Aj Green if Availible.

Why draft a quarterback number 7 overall, who will not be ready to start until 1-2yrs!? We still would have to aquire a qb. If I was GM and we had the 7th pick, id draft a player with instant impact to win a division that is very winnable. Peterson may go number 5 to Arizona.... just alone with that Pick Arizona will win 1-2 more games. We need that kind of impact, can Gabber get us to 8 wins this season? NOPE.

Did you really need to make another thread about Gabbert.... When thier like 3 other threads you could of made your rant on?

those are bandwagon threads! It is becoming even more clear that this will occur, so I felt it was worthy of indepth discussion of him being selected at 7. Would you be happy?

HUH? I didn't know everyone in draft rumors and news is a Gabbert fans.. Did you go and check every member. lmao

I never said they all were? did you read it correctly!? I said the thread is a "Blaine Gabbert Bandwagon" thread. Not an official BLAINE GABBERT AT PICK 7 thread

Dude not everyone in the Gabbert thread are Gabberrt fans.. You are labeling everyone just because you have disdain for the guy.. I don't like Gabbert myself,but you don't see me starting another thread.. When thier are Like 2 to 3 other threads I can discuss this in..

Exactly! but that thread is discussing Whether people like or dislike gabbert...read my posts not one post did I call them all Gabbert fans. This post is strictly to point out what may occur and what we should do instead. Not solely talking about Gabbert.

Dont get me wrong I dont hate Gabbert, in 2-3 years he can be very good. But to me We need a impactful player NOWWW

What I like is that Gabbert has a lightning quick release.

its 12:30 in the morning and its already blowin up with silly threads